Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Nursing assignment

COMMON HEALTH CONDITIONS WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR WOMEN

Case studies provide the opportunity to simulate realistic scenarios involving patients presenting with various health problems or symptoms. Such case studies enable nurse learners to apply concepts, lessons, and critical thinking to interviewing, screening, and diagnostic approaches, as well as to the development of treatment plans.

For this Case Study Assignment, you will chose from four case studies to identify common health implications for women. You will then explore the chosen case study to determine the diagnosis, diagnostic tests, and treatment options for the patient.

RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES


Required Readings

· Schuiling, K. D., & Likis, F. E. (2022). Gynecologic health care (4th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning.

· Chapter 17, “Breast Conditions” (pp. 337-349)

· Chapter 32, “Anatomy and Physiologic Adaptations of Normal Pregnancy” (pp. 677–673)

· Chapter 19, “Pregnancy Diagnosis, Decision-Making support, and Resolution” (pp. 367-379

·
Document: 

Week 8 Case Studies

 Download Week 8 Case Studies(PDF)

·
Document: 

Week 8 Case Study Template

 Download Week 8 Case Study Template(Word document)

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR HEALTH SCREENINGS

· American Academy of Family Practice (AAFP). (2020). 

Browse AAFP clinical recommendationsLinks to an external site.
.

· American Cancer Society, Inc. (ACS). (2020). 

Cancer A-ZLinks to an external site.
.

Note: As you review this resource, select the “Cancer A-Z” topic in the navigation to review information and Resources about for Cancer: Breast, Colon, Lung, Prostate, Skin.

· American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2020). 

Clinical topicsLinks to an external site.
.

Note: As you review this source, make sure to navigate to the “Topics” section in the navigation to review the clinical topics.

· HealthyPeople 2030. (2020). 


Healthy People 2030 Framework

Links to an external site.
.  

· U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPTFS). (2017, September). 


Search and Filter All Recommendation Topics

Links to an external site.
.

FNP RESOURCES

· Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (CDC). (n.d.). 

Disease & conditionsLinks to an external site.
.

· The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP). (2020). 

AANP practice: Clinical Resources, Business, acumen and opportunities for professional recognitionLinks to an external site.
.

GERIATRIC RESOURCES

· Nicholas, J. A., & Hall, W. J. (2011). 

Screening and preventive services for older adultsLinks to an external site.

The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, New York, 78(4), 498–508.

·
Document: 

General Guidelines for Health Screenings Matrix Template

 Download General Guidelines for Health Screenings Matrix Template(Word document)


Required Media

· Common Health Conditions 
Dr. Anne Salomone reviews and discusses the topics found in Weeks 7 & 8 (40 mins).


Optional Resources

Note: In Weeks 1-10, these resources are optional for your review. In Week 11, you will be required to review each of the PowerPoint slides from the text Gynecologic Health Care (4th ed.).

· Chapter 17, “

Breast Conditions

 Download Breast Conditions

· Chapter 32, “

Anatomy and Physiologic Adaptations of Normal Pregnancy

 Download Anatomy and Physiologic Adaptations of Normal Pregnancy

· Chapter 19, “

Pregnancy Diagnosis, Decision-Making support, and Resolution

 Download Pregnancy Diagnosis, Decision-Making support, and Resolution

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. 
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

· Review the 4 case studies in this week’s Learning Resources. Select one of the cases to prepare your written assignment.

· Review the Learning Resources for this week.

Assignment:

· Use the Assignment Template from the Learning Resources to complete your assignment. The template must be filled out and incorporated into the body of your paper (not submitted separately), ensuring all required information is included.

· The assignment should be written in paragraph format, including a title page and a reference page, and must address all the criteria outlined in the rubric.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 8

Submit your case study assignment by 
Day 7 of Week 8.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
Wk8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week8_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week8_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyzes subjective and objective data and outlines applicable diagnostic tests related to case studies.

30 to >26.7 pts

Excellent

The response provides clear, complete, and comprehensive descriptions of subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining all diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

26.7 to >23.7 pts

Good

The response provides clear, complete partial descriptions of the components of the subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining most of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair

The response provides some components of the subjective and objective case data, but they are incomplete, vague or inaccurate, outlining some of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor

The response provides unclear or incomplete components of subjective and objective case data. The diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions are missing, incorrect, or inappropriately applied.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies differential diagnoses related to case studies.

30 to >26.76 pts

Excellent

The response contains at least 3 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case.

26.76 to >23.7 pts

Good

The response contains at least 2 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair

The response contains at least 1 differential diagnosis relevant and applicable to the case.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor

The response contains few or no differential diagnoses and/or diagnoses are not relevant and applicable to the case.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormulates a treatment plan related to case studies based on scientific rationale, evidence- based standards of care, and practice guidelines. Integrates ethical, psychological, physical, financial issues and Social Determinants of Health in plan.

30 to >26.76 pts

Excellent

Formulates a thorough treatment plan including explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Fully incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources, with no less than 75% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

26.76 to >23.7 pts

Good

Formulates a partially complete treatment plan including partial explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Somewhat incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources with no less than 50% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair

Formulates a minimally complete treatment plan including incomplete or vague explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Lacking in synthesis of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least 2 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor

Formulates a treatment plan that contains incomplete explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options and/ or explanations are missing. Lacks synthesis gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by 1 or no current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

image1.jpeg

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Week 7 assigm

Complete this assignment assuming the perspective of a member of a QI team in charge of reviewing facility policies and procedures related to Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers (HAPUs). Section 1: Identify Describe your assigned topic and why it is a concern in healthcare. Summarize a current policy or procedure at your

reflection

Required headings include: Relevant and Meaningful Service Enhanced Academic Learning Purposeful Civic Learning Purposeful Reflections Critical Thinking/Conclusion

Nursing week 3 assignment

Middle Range Theory Utilization and Application: Kolcaba’s Theory of Comfort Yairys Pereda St. Thomas University NUR 501: Philosophical & Theoretical Evidence-Based Research Professor: Dr. Eleni S. Miralles January 26, 2026 Abstract Middle range nursing theories provide practical frameworks that bridge abstract concepts and clinical application. Kolcaba’s Theory of Comfort is

Community Health

Please see attached. Research a selected local, national, or global nonprofit organization or government agency from the document provided. Determine how the organization or agency contributes to public health and safety improvements, promotes equal opportunity, and improves the quality of life within the community. Selected organization : National Alliance on

Discussion #6

Module 6 Discussion     Approaches to Disease Management: Hypertension  After studying Module 6: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following: Read Garzon, D. L., Driessnack, M., Dirks, M., Duderstadt, K. G., & Gaylord, N. M. (2024). · Chapter 32: Respiratory Disorders · Chapter 33: Cardiovascular Disorders · Chapter 34: Gastrointestinal

Nursing Assignment

Part 1: STAFF EDUCATION PLAN Data must be supported by evidence-based literature with APA reference list included – (25 points) ***Use of Artificial Intelligence or prohibited outside resources to complete this project is strictly prohibited.*** I. PART 1: THE PLAN A.  Determine a Learning Need: (10 points) – use template

Nursing week 6 assignment

Scholarly Writing For this assignment, you will write a paper on the pharmacological management of the disease. The paper should include a review of the: · Select a disease process that is of interest to you- Cystic fibrosis · Pathophysiology of the disease state. · Review of the pharmacological agents

Nursing homework

Topic-Rapid Response vs. code Blue: Knowing when to Act Part 1: STAFF EDUCATION PLAN Data must be supported by evidence-based literature with APA reference list included – (25 points) ***Use of Artificial Intelligence or prohibited outside resources to complete this project is strictly prohibited.*** I. PART 1: THE PLAN A. 

Policy Analysis

I need assistance in choosing a state health policy reform innovation

Nursing week 8_Assignment_DNP855

 Change theory –       What it is in YOUR project Nursing theory : Orem Self-Care Deficit Theory  = theoretical framework  Change theory PDSA cycle Intervention DSMP + SDSCA tool Outcome : Improved self-care behaviors

Treatments for Genitourinary Tract Disorders

please answer the following questions: Describe urinary tract infection, causes, symptoms and treatment Discuss treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia Describe overactive bladder, causes, symptoms and treatment  Treatment options and recommendations for different STIs (Chlamydia, Gonorrhea and Syphilis)

Personhood

Discuss the concept of personhood as used in the nursing as caring theory.

Nursing Homework

General Instructions   To implement evidence-based practice, advanced practice nurses must evaluate current research findings for application to practice. Create a PowerPoint Presentation and address the following requirements:   1. Download the  Week 7 Evidence-Based Practice Change template  Download Week 7 Evidence-Based Practice Change template Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader.

NUR 640

Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 3 Step 1: You will use the Graduate Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Template  Download Graduate Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Template to: 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychotherapy evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic. 2. Upload your completed comprehensive psychotherapy evaluation as a Word doc. Scanned PDFs will

nurse

Now that you have completed the priority aspects of 1.0 and 2.0 of the Hoshin-Kanri Model for strategic planning, the time has come to complete aspect 3.0. · Reflect back on the goals identified in your Part 1 and Part 2 assignments. · Create a PowerPoint presentation that outlines at

PowerPoint on Dementia, Alzheimer’s

Write a comprehensive 10–15 minute PowerPoint presentation on dementia. The presentation should clearly define dementia and provide an in-depth discussion of its classifications, major types, underlying causes, risk factors (both modifiable and non-modifiable), diagnostic approach, and current treatment options, including both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management strategies.  Use this book if