Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Nursing assignment

COMMON HEALTH CONDITIONS WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR WOMEN

Case studies provide the opportunity to simulate realistic scenarios involving patients presenting with various health problems or symptoms. Such case studies enable nurse learners to apply concepts, lessons, and critical thinking to interviewing, screening, and diagnostic approaches, as well as to the development of treatment plans.

For this Case Study Assignment, you will chose from four case studies to identify common health implications for women. You will then explore the chosen case study to determine the diagnosis, diagnostic tests, and treatment options for the patient.

RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES


Required Readings

· Schuiling, K. D., & Likis, F. E. (2022). Gynecologic health care (4th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning.

· Chapter 17, “Breast Conditions” (pp. 337-349)

· Chapter 32, “Anatomy and Physiologic Adaptations of Normal Pregnancy” (pp. 677–673)

· Chapter 19, “Pregnancy Diagnosis, Decision-Making support, and Resolution” (pp. 367-379

·
Document: 

Week 8 Case Studies

 Download Week 8 Case Studies(PDF)

·
Document: 

Week 8 Case Study Template

 Download Week 8 Case Study Template(Word document)

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR HEALTH SCREENINGS

· American Academy of Family Practice (AAFP). (2020). 

Browse AAFP clinical recommendationsLinks to an external site.
.

· American Cancer Society, Inc. (ACS). (2020). 

Cancer A-ZLinks to an external site.
.

Note: As you review this resource, select the “Cancer A-Z” topic in the navigation to review information and Resources about for Cancer: Breast, Colon, Lung, Prostate, Skin.

· American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2020). 

Clinical topicsLinks to an external site.
.

Note: As you review this source, make sure to navigate to the “Topics” section in the navigation to review the clinical topics.

· HealthyPeople 2030. (2020). 


Healthy People 2030 Framework

Links to an external site.
.  

· U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPTFS). (2017, September). 


Search and Filter All Recommendation Topics

Links to an external site.
.

FNP RESOURCES

· Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (CDC). (n.d.). 

Disease & conditionsLinks to an external site.
.

· The American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP). (2020). 

AANP practice: Clinical Resources, Business, acumen and opportunities for professional recognitionLinks to an external site.
.

GERIATRIC RESOURCES

· Nicholas, J. A., & Hall, W. J. (2011). 

Screening and preventive services for older adultsLinks to an external site.

The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, New York, 78(4), 498–508.

·
Document: 

General Guidelines for Health Screenings Matrix Template

 Download General Guidelines for Health Screenings Matrix Template(Word document)


Required Media

· Common Health Conditions 
Dr. Anne Salomone reviews and discusses the topics found in Weeks 7 & 8 (40 mins).


Optional Resources

Note: In Weeks 1-10, these resources are optional for your review. In Week 11, you will be required to review each of the PowerPoint slides from the text Gynecologic Health Care (4th ed.).

· Chapter 17, “

Breast Conditions

 Download Breast Conditions

· Chapter 32, “

Anatomy and Physiologic Adaptations of Normal Pregnancy

 Download Anatomy and Physiologic Adaptations of Normal Pregnancy

· Chapter 19, “

Pregnancy Diagnosis, Decision-Making support, and Resolution

 Download Pregnancy Diagnosis, Decision-Making support, and Resolution

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. 
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

· Review the 4 case studies in this week’s Learning Resources. Select one of the cases to prepare your written assignment.

· Review the Learning Resources for this week.

Assignment:

· Use the Assignment Template from the Learning Resources to complete your assignment. The template must be filled out and incorporated into the body of your paper (not submitted separately), ensuring all required information is included.

· The assignment should be written in paragraph format, including a title page and a reference page, and must address all the criteria outlined in the rubric.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 8

Submit your case study assignment by 
Day 7 of Week 8.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the 
Turnitin Drafts from the 
Start Here area. 

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as 
Wk8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on 
Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on 
Upload File and select 
Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week8_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week8_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyzes subjective and objective data and outlines applicable diagnostic tests related to case studies.

30 to >26.7 pts

Excellent

The response provides clear, complete, and comprehensive descriptions of subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining all diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

26.7 to >23.7 pts

Good

The response provides clear, complete partial descriptions of the components of the subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining most of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair

The response provides some components of the subjective and objective case data, but they are incomplete, vague or inaccurate, outlining some of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor

The response provides unclear or incomplete components of subjective and objective case data. The diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions are missing, incorrect, or inappropriately applied.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies differential diagnoses related to case studies.

30 to >26.76 pts

Excellent

The response contains at least 3 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case.

26.76 to >23.7 pts

Good

The response contains at least 2 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair

The response contains at least 1 differential diagnosis relevant and applicable to the case.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor

The response contains few or no differential diagnoses and/or diagnoses are not relevant and applicable to the case.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormulates a treatment plan related to case studies based on scientific rationale, evidence- based standards of care, and practice guidelines. Integrates ethical, psychological, physical, financial issues and Social Determinants of Health in plan.

30 to >26.76 pts

Excellent

Formulates a thorough treatment plan including explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Fully incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources, with no less than 75% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

26.76 to >23.7 pts

Good

Formulates a partially complete treatment plan including partial explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Somewhat incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources with no less than 50% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

23.7 to >20.7 pts

Fair

Formulates a minimally complete treatment plan including incomplete or vague explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Lacking in synthesis of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least 2 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

20.7 to >0 pts

Poor

Formulates a treatment plan that contains incomplete explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options and/ or explanations are missing. Lacks synthesis gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by 1 or no current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.45 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4.45 to >3.95 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.95 to >3.45 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3.45 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

image1.jpeg

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

ANACHIABU?

Help organizing  Using Primary Sources Article 1: Universal Precautions BACKGROUND OF THE PRIMARY SOURCE Primary Source: Creator: Date: Background of the source: ANALYZING THE PRIMARY SOURCE What powerful words or phrases were used? What purpose did the creator have? What makes you think this was the purpose? What was the

Nurs 6003

  Academic and Professional Network Complete Part 1 of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template . Be sure to address the following: Identify at least two academic and at least two professional individuals or teams to collaborate with to be successful in your MSN program and as a practicing nurse. Explain why you

Nursing Assignment

Part 2: STAFF EDUCATION PRESENTATION (35 points) ***The use of Artificial Intelligence to complete this project is strictly prohibited.** II. PART 2: THE PRESENTATION – you do NOT write a separate paper The Staff Education plan will be developed and evaluated in the Clinical III course. The plan may be

patient safety

  Discussion: Apply Knowledge Step 1: Watch the Patient Safety Movement videoLinks. Step 2: Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail. Paragraph one: Discuss one quality and safety issue you observed while watching the video and explain the impact of this issue. Paragraph two: Discuss how the role

holistic nursing

how is holistic care tied to pathophysiology, pharmacology and physical assessment 

Question

“This is My letter to the World.” 1. What is the significance of the title “This is my Letter to the World” in the context of the poem? 2. How does the speaker’s tone change throughout the poem? 3. What themes or emotions does the speaker convey through the imagery

Hospital case

 Read the attached case and answer the following questions: Should a hospital have the right to use whatever means necessary to collect for the services it provides? Why or why not?  What other means could the hospital have used to determine if patients were SSI eligible?  What do you think

home work

Competency 1. Identify the major concepts of selected nursing theories. 2. Differentiate the components of the research process. 3. Compare research methodologies. 4. Explain the relationship between research, theory, and evidence-based practice. 5. Propose an evidence-based solution aligned with an evidence-based practice question. Scenario As a BSN prepared Registered Nurse

Can you help by tomorrow?

Week 7 Assignment This week, all the hard work you have done in researching your topic and issue will come to fruition in your argumentative paper. Address the requirements below to complete your paper: 1. Follow the directions in the assigned textbook reading on how to write an argumentative essay

NUR 640

NUR 640 Weekly Discussion FYI Remember… I am a Black Haitian American Female live in USA, FL Submission Instructions: • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points. Week

Staff Education

My Topic is : Clinical Skills & Best Practices Pain management: pharmacologic & non-pharmacologic as a new nurse 

Nursing Bj edit assignment

bj edit assignment  Herzing University, 2025 Problem Statement Worksheet NU801 Project Development and Management Herzing University Beverly Jordan 02/08/2026 Professor Dr. Natasha Colvin Constructing a Problem Statement Questions Responses What is the problem? Many of the veterans who have been referred out of outpatient mental health clinics do not follow

2 soap notes rw

2 soap notes rw SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach

565 week 8 discussion

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the Collaboration Café. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.  Include the following sections:  Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail. Look back at your initial post and respond to peers and faculty that have commented.  Reflect on your learning

Nursing week 7 assignment instructions

Critical Research Appraisal Assignment Goal: You will critically appraise a research design Selected Qualitative Research Article (2023) Kivunja, S., Pryor, J., River, J., & Gullick, J. (2024). Conceptualizing personhood in nursing care for people with altered consciousness, cognition, and behaviors: A qualitative discussion paper. Nursing Philosophy, 25(3), e12490. Selected Quantitative

Week 7 assigm

Complete this assignment assuming the perspective of a member of a QI team in charge of reviewing facility policies and procedures related to Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers (HAPUs). Section 1: Identify Describe your assigned topic and why it is a concern in healthcare. Summarize a current policy or procedure at your