Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Nursing Assignment week 3

Week 3 Research Proposal Project: Literature Review

Literature Review

This week, you will receive feedback from your instructor on your rough draft assignment. You will edit, revise, and add any additional information to your literature review based on your instructor feedback and additional research and reading. This submission should be more polished than your previous version. As you continue to read about your chosen research topic, feel free to add to your literature review and make it even more meaningful for your research proposal.

The following requirements should be met in your literature review:

· Include a minimum of six scholarly sources

· Organize in logical sections

· Include an overview of the literature

· Be unbiased in your presentation of information

· Include sources and content relevant to your research questions and hypothesis; state the relevance in your literature review

· Include a critical assessment of the sources. Do not simply include a summary of what you have read

· A strong introduction and conclusion, including further questions for research

· Proper APA formatting, citations, and references

Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)

Points Possible: 60

Rubric

NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Literature Review

NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Literature Review

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources

3 to >2.46 pts

Accomplished

A minimum of 6 scholarly sources are included and are appropriate for the topic at hand

2.46 to >2.25 pts

Emerging

A minimum of 4 scholarly sources are included and are somewhat appropriate for the topic at hand.

2.25 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

0+ scholarly sources are included and are somewhat appropriate for the topic at hand.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction and Conclusion

6 to >4.92 pts

Accomplished

A strong introduction and conclusion are included that appropriately introduce the topic and conclude the literature review.

4.92 to >4.5 pts

Emerging

An introduction and conclusion are included that somewhat introduce the topic and somewhat conclude the literature review.

4.5 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

An introduction and conclusion may be absent or highly inappropriate.

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review

33 to >27.06 pts

Accomplished

A comprehensive analysis of the data (with in-text APA citations as needed) is presented. A complete, detailed review of the validity of the data and the findings is presented. A clear and thorough assessment of the relevance of the source in addressing your research area is presented. Your unique contribution is clearly identified. Ideas not addressed, gaps in the data or analysis, or new problems that emerge from your review of the literature are well identified.

27.06 to >24.75 pts

Emerging

A vague or incomplete analysis of the data (with in-text APA citations as needed) is presented. A general review of the validity of the data and the findings is presented. A general assessment of the relevance of the source in addressing your research area is presented. Your unique contribution is somewhat identified. Ideas not addressed, gaps in the data or analysis, or new problems that emerge from your review of the literature are somewhat identified.

24.75 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Literature review is missing or incomplete. The review does not provide enough information to attach to a problem statement.

33 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEdits

12 to >9.84 pts

Accomplished

Literature review includes edits recommended by the instructor and shows improvement from the rough draft version.

9.84 to >9.0 pts

Emerging

Literature review includes some edits recommended by the instructor and shows some improvement from the rough draft version.

9 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Literature review includes few or no edits recommended by the instructor and shows little or no improvement from the rough draft version.

12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA & Mechanics

6 to >4.92 pts

Accomplished

The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. There are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.

4.92 to >4.5 pts

Emerging

The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.

4.5 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.

6 pts

Total Points: 60


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

op ed

  Develop a substantial Op-ed on several thought-leaders’ viewpoints pertaining to the future of health care finance. Search credible sources for industry leaders talking about the future of healthcare financial management. Pick 2-3 sources that resonate with you most or, as an alternative, pick conflicting positions.   Now consider everything

Gerontology Clinicals Discussion 7

Weekly Clinical Experience 7 Describe your clinical experience for this week for a 72 year old male patient with flu-like symptoms, fever, cough, body aches, and chills · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs

Gerontology Discussion 7

Case 6 Mrs. P. is an 80-year-old woman recently discharged from a 24-hour observation stay at the hospital after being diagnosed with acute bronchitis. She has a history of heart failure, hypertension, osteoarthritis, GERD, and hyperlipidemia. She has no history of smoking. While in the hospital she was prescribed doxycycline,

Biostadistic

Module 6:  Assignment 1 Read the information below to write a conclusion based on a 95% Confidence Interval for the following randomized trial.   A randomized trial is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a newly developed pain reliever designed to reduce pain in patients following joint replacement surgery. The

Biostadistic

Module 5:  Assignment 1 Here’s an example where the Poisson distribution was used in a maternity hospital to work out how many births would be expected during the night. The hospital had 3000 deliveries each year, so if these happened randomly around the clock 1000 deliveries would be expected between

Biostadistic

Module 5: Assignment 2 in the following graphs, determine if the age and height would be considered normal or not normal distribution. 11/29/25, 1:22 PM Module 5: Assignment 2 1/5 11/29/25, 1:22 PM Module 5: Assignment 2 2/5 11/29/25, 1:22 PM Module 5: Assignment 2 3/5 11/29/25, 1:22 PM Module 5:

HOME WORK

NU 676 UNIT 7 Assignment Instructions  Assignment Details  Assignment topic: Childhood Trauma and Maltreatment Research childhood trauma and maltreatment as well as the mandated reporting of these disorders, and describe your findings. Your assignment should be minimum 2- to 3-page paper answering the following questions. Be sure to include a

assign1

Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Before embarking on any professional or academic activity, it is important to understand the background, knowledge, and experience you bring to it. You might ask yourself “What do I  already know? What do I  need to know? And what do I  want to know?” This critical self-reflection is

Nursing Assignment

Level 2: Clinical Performance Evaluation- ADNG 2100 Clinical II · Student will complete a self-evaluation of each student learning outcome below using the criteria on the left found under each outcome. Briefly summarize, either in bullet point or paragraph form, your own evaluation of performance in each. Be specific, give

nursing judjement outcome

Mental Health Experience and Data Collection Objectives 1) Develop a relationship with an individual diagnosed with a mental health condition/problem and utilize therapeutic communication and document review to obtain a psychosocial history. (Human Flourishing) 2) Begin to develop connections between a primary mental health diagnosis and the etiologic factors and

W5 RUA

  Hospital Acquired Infection:  n hospitalized adult patients, does increased nursing compliance with hand hygiene protocols compared to low compliance affect the rate of C. Diff infections over a six month period”? 

Practicum Objectives

Practicum Objectives This course includes a 160-hour practicum as part of the required clinical hours for the DNP credential. The practicum experience enables you to explore key issues related to your specialty practice and to refine your leadership skills as you work with others at your practicum site. To guide

Genetic

Answer all questions  BIOL-2416 Baggett – Unit 04 – Study Tips Study Suggestions for Exam #4 over Chapters 14-16 & 18 General Exam Format and Information What to bring: knowledge and understanding, your signed 4×6 notecard, at least 2 sharpened pencils and a calculator if you have one (can borrow

part two

The learning resources this week serve as salient illustrations of the need for the nursing professional to bring their ‘A’ game to the practice environment.  Our professional responsibility, be it through our direct care or indirect care practices, is to be vigilant in our surveillance of quality and safety in

Health Maintenance

The purpose of this assignment is to develop a health maintenance plan for a selected Disease, such as asthma, hepatitis, hypo and hyperthyroidism, and coronary artery disease, in a selected Population. 1. Assess, develop, and recommend health maintenance plans for clients in all developmental stages of life within the primary

RUA Group

The topic is   Hospital Acquired Infection.  PICOT is as follows: “In hospitalized adult patients, does increased nursing compliance with hand hygiene protocols compared to low compliance affect the rate of C. Diff infections over a six month period”?  -Correlates research findings to identified clinical issue.