Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Nursing Assignment week 3

Week 3 Research Proposal Project: Literature Review

Literature Review

This week, you will receive feedback from your instructor on your rough draft assignment. You will edit, revise, and add any additional information to your literature review based on your instructor feedback and additional research and reading. This submission should be more polished than your previous version. As you continue to read about your chosen research topic, feel free to add to your literature review and make it even more meaningful for your research proposal.

The following requirements should be met in your literature review:

· Include a minimum of six scholarly sources

· Organize in logical sections

· Include an overview of the literature

· Be unbiased in your presentation of information

· Include sources and content relevant to your research questions and hypothesis; state the relevance in your literature review

· Include a critical assessment of the sources. Do not simply include a summary of what you have read

· A strong introduction and conclusion, including further questions for research

· Proper APA formatting, citations, and references

Due Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)

Points Possible: 60

Rubric

NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Literature Review

NURS_540_DE – NURS540 Literature Review

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources

3 to >2.46 pts

Accomplished

A minimum of 6 scholarly sources are included and are appropriate for the topic at hand

2.46 to >2.25 pts

Emerging

A minimum of 4 scholarly sources are included and are somewhat appropriate for the topic at hand.

2.25 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

0+ scholarly sources are included and are somewhat appropriate for the topic at hand.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction and Conclusion

6 to >4.92 pts

Accomplished

A strong introduction and conclusion are included that appropriately introduce the topic and conclude the literature review.

4.92 to >4.5 pts

Emerging

An introduction and conclusion are included that somewhat introduce the topic and somewhat conclude the literature review.

4.5 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

An introduction and conclusion may be absent or highly inappropriate.

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review

33 to >27.06 pts

Accomplished

A comprehensive analysis of the data (with in-text APA citations as needed) is presented. A complete, detailed review of the validity of the data and the findings is presented. A clear and thorough assessment of the relevance of the source in addressing your research area is presented. Your unique contribution is clearly identified. Ideas not addressed, gaps in the data or analysis, or new problems that emerge from your review of the literature are well identified.

27.06 to >24.75 pts

Emerging

A vague or incomplete analysis of the data (with in-text APA citations as needed) is presented. A general review of the validity of the data and the findings is presented. A general assessment of the relevance of the source in addressing your research area is presented. Your unique contribution is somewhat identified. Ideas not addressed, gaps in the data or analysis, or new problems that emerge from your review of the literature are somewhat identified.

24.75 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Literature review is missing or incomplete. The review does not provide enough information to attach to a problem statement.

33 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEdits

12 to >9.84 pts

Accomplished

Literature review includes edits recommended by the instructor and shows improvement from the rough draft version.

9.84 to >9.0 pts

Emerging

Literature review includes some edits recommended by the instructor and shows some improvement from the rough draft version.

9 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Literature review includes few or no edits recommended by the instructor and shows little or no improvement from the rough draft version.

12 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA & Mechanics

6 to >4.92 pts

Accomplished

The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. There are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.

4.92 to >4.5 pts

Emerging

The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.

4.5 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

No attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper.

6 pts

Total Points: 60


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

JOURNAL ENTRY

Journal Entry   JOURNAL ENTRY Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you to identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills, while also recognizing your strengths and successes. Use this Journal to reflect on your clinical

Treatments for Respiratory Disorders

Describe causes of Upper respiratory infections and drug therapy  Discuss triggers of asthma and treatment options Discuss corticosteroids  Describe chronic bronchitis and treatment options

Mm PowerPoint week 5

Mm week 5 ppt Implementing a Nurse-Led Fall Risk Assessment and Prevention Program to Reduce Falls Among Older Adults in an Adult Day Care Setting Student Name Course Name Instructor Name Institution Date Problem Description Falls among older adults remain a leading cause of injury, hospitalization, and loss of independence

Mitz soap week 5

Mitz soap week 5 Initial Psychiatric Interview/SOAP Note Template There are different ways in which to complete a Psychiatric SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) Note. This is a template that is meant to guide you as you continue to develop your style of SOAP in the psychiatric practice setting.

Nursing

Post a response including the following: What are the characteristics of the research study (Tzeng & Yin, 2017), the quality improvement study (Khoja & Moosa, 2023), and the DNP project (Bangura, 2024) in terms of generalizability, sampling, and the nature of ethical protections?  Compare and contrast ethical considerations in research

MR soap week 5

Mr soap week 5 SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach

question

Reassessment of Strengths and Opportunities There is a saying that “people must look back in order to look forward.” As you transition out of this practicum, finish your program, and look forward to your career beyond the program, you must “look back” at all that you have accomplished, taking stock

Nursing

To Prepare Review the resources provided in the Nursing Informatics Competencies.  By Day 3 of Week 10 Post a cohesive response to the following: Consider all that you already knew and what you have learned in this class. What are the key informatics competencies that you feel every nurse should

home work

Competency Compare research methodologies. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane. Scenario You are enrolled in an undergraduate nursing research course while obtaining your BSN. In preparation

PHI-#5

Please see attached Complete the Case Study: Tonya Archer media activity, which is linked later in this assessment. Before you begin creating your submission for this assessment, make sure you have worked through the Tonya Archer case study. This will provide the foundational context for the assessment, for which you

Safety and Quality #4

Please see attached. Imagine you are a member of a Quality Improvement Council at any type of health care system, whether acute, ambulatory, home health, managed care, et cetera. Your Council has identified that newly hired nurses would benefit from comprehensive training on the importance of nursing-sensitive quality indicators. The

Duscussion help x2

   801 A Discussion Post # 1: Please provide practical advice and tools to help tackle the change leader’s challenge? 801 A Discussion Post # 2: What would you do if you were Odiotti and Seiberlich?

Speak over ppt

Case Study Introduction Please include a brief introduction Case Scenario: Patient Name: Diagnosis: Background: Mental Status Assessment Perception Thought Process Content of thought Judgment Insight Cognition Selected Therapy Please include a description and the goals of the therapy of your choice. Selected Therapy Why did you select this therapy for

NUR507W4

DISCUSSION: Discuss a dermatologic disorder (ECZEMA) and its treatment modalities. Submission Instructions: · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  · All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible. INSTRUCTIONS: · Your

Nursing Week 6_Assignment_DNP855

 Developing teams is essential for providing healthcare that is patient-centered, safe, timely, effective, efficient, and equitable. 

Journal Response Week 6

 Building a successful team is about finding the right mix of people and professional skills.   Overview In this module, you will examine the dynamics of group decision-making and how to build successful teams. Building a successful team is about finding the right mix of people and professional skills. This