Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Principle of Ethics

Introduction

In this session, you have been considering moral-ethical dilemmas you yourself faced or that you know of that you either resolved or failed to resolve, but hopefully learned from. You may never have given much thought to ethical theory nor what ethical premises/paradigms you have unconsciously held.

You will be focusing on this case for this assignment:

Jane Doe is a nursing student at University X. Jane is in week eight of a course entitled: “Introduction to Ethics”.

For the week one discussion, Jane copied work done by her friend John Doe in the same class two months ago (with a different professor). John told Jane it was okay to use his work as John’s professor never checked any work in the class using Turnitin.com. John claimed to have earned an A on the work also.

In week two, Jane went to StudentPapering.com and paid ten dollars for a week two essay done by a student (not John Doe) who took the same course four months ago. StudentPapering promises that all its archived work is of excellent quality and cannot be detected as copied. Jane then uploaded an exact copy of the work for the week two assignment.

In week three, Jane paid a worker at PaperingStudent.com ten dollars to write for Jane a brand new essay after Jane shared with the worker the essay assignment instructions.

In week four, Jane relied on her knowledge of Esperanto. She felt pressed for time and found an article by a professor from Esperanto on the week four topic. She translated Esperanto into English using Moogle Translate, and the translated text served as her week four paper.

In week five, Jane was running late again. Jane purposely uploaded a blank paper hoping that she would later claim it was an innocent mistake and not be assessed a late penalty. In a previous course on History, she had done the same (with an earlier paper from the History class rather than simply a blank) and had not seen any late penalty assessed.

In week six, Jane took work she did in a nursing course from a year ago and submitted that for her discussion posting in her current class. She simply copied and pasted the work she had labored intensively on a year ago (even though University X forbids this practice as ‘self-plagiarism’). Jane was confident her Nursing instructor never checked that work using Turnitin.com or another method.

In week seven, Jane copied work found at ChatGPT for the paper. Jane did not use any quotation marks or other documentation to show the text was from artificial intelligence and not by Jane.

Since Jane’s Ethics professor did not check papers and posting for any issues by using Turnitin.com or another method, the professor graded all of Jane’s work unaware of Jane’s actions throughout the weeks of the class. Jane feels her actions are morally justified both because her economic situation requires her to work too much to devote time to school (although other students are well-off enough to have such time) and her religion forbids cheating, but Jane ignores her religion’s teachings.

Instructions

Now that you have had an opportunity to explore ethics formally, create a reflective assessment of your learning experience and the collaborations you engaged in throughout this session. You will submit 
both of the following:

· A written reflection

· An oral presentation using a PowerPoint narrated slide show.

For the written reflection, address Jane Doe’s and respond to the following:

· Articulate again your moral theory from week eight discussion (You can revise it if you wish). What two ethical theories best apply to it? Why those two?

· Apply to Jane Doe’s case your personal moral philosophy as developed in week eight discussion and now. Use it to determine if what Jane Doe did was ethical or unethical per your own moral philosophy.

· Propose a course of social action and a solution by using the ethics of egoism, utilitarianism, the “veil of ignorance” method, deontological principles, and/or a theory of justice to deal with students like  Jane. Consider social values such as those concerning ways of life while appraising the interests of diverse populations (for instance, those of differing religions and economic status).

For the oral presentation, briefly summarize your feelings about taking a course in Ethics and explore your process of transformation in this course.

· Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings, and where you are now. Consider your interaction in discussions.

· Should health care workers be required to take a course in Ethics? Why or why not

· References page (minimum of 2 scholarly sources)

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Discussion board post

For this discussion, you will articulate your process for approaching a literature review that will help refine your annotated bibliography. 

Spring 2025

I am hoping to reconnect with Sheryl Hogan Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title Putting It All Together Directions: Read the directions carefully for each section and completely fill in the table for all 4 parts. Part 1: Source Review For Part I, review Adira, et al.’s (2022)

Excel

Communications Template Stakeholder Name Role Information Timeframe Media Responsible for Updates Responsible for Delivery

home work

Please follow instructions and No Ai . Please no copyright LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Funder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle (9th ed.). W. W. Norton. Chapter 9, “Basics of Psychoanalysis” Chapter 10, “Psychoanalysis After Freud: Neo-Freudians, Object Relations, and Current Research” Walden University Writing Center. (2021). Using quotations, part

Presentation

Powerpoint presentation instructions are listed below  Presentation Grading Rubric PSYC2430 Name: Course: Title: Quality of Visual Aids ___/4 Script/knowledge of Material ___/3 Title and Hypothesis ___/3 Variables and Reasoning ___/3 Previous Research Review ___/3 Participants and Material ___/3 Procedure ___/3 Creativity ___/3 TOTAL ________ / 25 · Make sure to

week 6 discussion

  Collapse Describe the variety of ways that one can assess the validity of an instrument in terms of our self-esteem measure. If we were creating a new measure of self-esteem, what is the process that we would use to validate this measure?

psychology 1

Skip to main content My Account Page path Home StraighterLine Moodle Username Password Remember username Log in Forgotten your username or password? Cookies must be enabled in your browser Some courses may allow guest access Log in as a guest © 2023 StraighterLine. All rights reserved

Psychology ADVERTISEMENT ASSIGNMENT

   Build upon the topic selected in the Psychoeducational Group Plan Assignment to focus on developing a psychotherapy group. The first step in this process is to create a recruitment flyer that effectively communicates the purpose and structure of the group while attracting suitable members.    Watch from 1:05:35 to 1:23:15.

Impact of Life Experiences on Development

How does life experiences impact development? The Impact of Life Experiences on Development Complete a 7- to 9-page (not including title page and references) paper with the following criteria: Choose four events from your life which you believe had a significant impact on your development. There must be at least

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Analysis of the Terms: Polarization and Groupthink After reading the module and the assigned references, students will complete a written assignment where they explain and analyze, in their own words, the terms  Polarization and  Groupthink. The task includes: · Providing a concrete example of how a group demonstrates each

Group Dynamics

see attachment    Effects of Groupthink After reading the module and the article by Smith (or the article selected by the course instructor), each student will critically analyze the material and critically address the following question and points for analysis: Article:  Smith, T. E. (2016). The road to high-quality decision-making:

Car & pow

ECED 6260: Career Development and Appraisal Spring 2025 Career Project Rubric Total Points: 100 You will create an individual presentation that includes a written portion, visual component, and class presentation/powerpoint submission. Each student will be required to write a paper and to create a powerpoint presentation. A very general guide

home work

Please follow instructions . No Ai LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Funder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle (9th ed.). W. W. Norton. Chapter 5, “Traits and Types: The Big Five and Beyond” Chapter 6, “Personality Stability, Development, and Change” Truity. ( (2021). Truity.com Locate the Personality Tests drop down menu

Identify Different Theories of Gender Development

Social learning theory and cognitive development theory have valid criticisms when applied to gender development. However, when viewed together, they do a fairly good job of describing how gender develops in children.  Studying and reviewing these two theories for your assignment this week will help you prepare for your signature

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Content Analysis After studying, analyzing, and reflecting on the module’s content and references, students will: · Write an analysis on how important they consider observation and analysis of group functioning to be for the effectiveness and achievement of the group’s goals. · Provide a supported response to the

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Use of Observation Keys After studying this module, students will: · Identify and select a type of group to describe and analyze its forms of communication. · To structure their writing, students will use the key questions for group observation presented in the module. · Once their contribution

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Reading Analysis Students must read the articles by Gervits et al. (2016) and Felps et al. (2006). Gervits, F., Eberhard, K., & Scheutz, M. (2016). Team communication as a collaborative process.  Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3(62), 1-14. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00062  to an external site. Felps, W., Mitchell, T.R.,