Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Problem Space and Problem Statement

All requirements in attachments

8/19/24, 10:28 PM

Page 1 of 3about:srcdoc

Problem Space and Problem Statement – Rubric Total 200 points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory
2. Less Than
Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent

Problem Emergence

Discussion of How

Recent Studies Illustrate

the Existence of the

Problem and the Need

for Additional Research

0 points

A discussion of how

recent studies illustrate

the existence of the

problem and the need

for additional research is

either missing or not

evident.

21.9 points

A discussion of how

recent studies illustrate

the existence of the

problem and the need

for additional research is

illogical or inaccurate.

The existing literature

does not illustrate the

existence of the problem

or the need for

additional research.

Argument lacks

consistent unity. There

are obvious flaws in the

logic.

24.6 points

A discussion of how

recent studies illustrate

the existence of the

problem and the need

for additional research is

cursory. The existing

literature distantly

illustrates the existence

of the problem or the

need for additional

research. Argument

logically, but not

thoroughly, supports the

purpose. Sources used

are credible.

Introduction and

conclusion bracket the

thesis.

27.3 points

A discussion of how

recent studies illustrate

the existence of the

problem and the need

for additional research is

thorough. The existing

literature loosely

illustrates the existence

of the problem or the

need for additional

research. Argument

shows logical

progressions.

Techniques of

argumentation are

evident. There is a

smooth progression of

claims from introduction

to conclusion.

30 points

A discussion of how

recent studies illustrate

the existence of the

problem and the need

for additional research is

thorough. The existing

literature clearly

illustrates the existence

of the problem or the

need for additional

research. The proposed

problem space directly

emerges from a

synthesis of the

limitations or future

study ideas from the

cited literature. Scholarly

research is used for

support and is current

or seminal. Argument is

clear and convincing,

presenting a persuasive

claim in a distinctive and

compelling manner.

Articulation of the
Problem

Articulation of the

Problem and Its Size and

Scope

0 points

An articulation of the

problem and its size and

scope is missing or not

evident to the reader.

29.2 points

An articulation of the

problem and its size and

scope is present but

illogical or inaccurate.

32.8 points

An articulation of the

problem and its size and

scope is present but

remains vague. A clear

understanding of the

problem has not yet

been formed.

36.4 points

An articulation of the

problem and its size and

scope is present. An

understanding of the

problem is relatively

evident.

40 points

An articulation of the

problem and its size and

scope is present. A clear

understanding of the

problem is evident.

Significance of the
Study

Argument for the

Significance and

Relevance of the

Potential Study

0 points

An argument for the

significance and

relevance of the

potential study is

missing or not evident to

the reader.

29.2 points

An argument for the

significance and

relevance of the

potential study is

present but inaccurate

or unintelligible. There is

no mention of

contributions of the

study to existing

literature or to the

informing of practice.

32.8 points

An argument for the

significance and

relevance of the

potential study is

present but remains

cursory. There is only a

veiled mention of

contributions of the

study to existing

literature or to the

informing of practice.

Argument logically, but

not thoroughly, supports

the purpose. Sources

used are credible.

Introduction and

36.4 points

An argument for the

significance and

relevance of the

potential study is

present and relatively

well-conceived. There is

reasonable mention of

contributions of the

study to existing

literature or to the

informing of practice.

Argument shows logical

progressions.

Techniques of

argumentation are

evident. There is a

40 points

A clearly articulated

argument for the

significance and

relevance of the

potential study is

presented and well-

conceived. There is a

clear statement of

contributions of the

study to existing

literature or to the

informing of practice.

Argument is clear and

convincing, presenting a

persuasive claim in a

distinctive and

8/19/24, 10:28 PM

Page 2 of 3about:srcdoc

conclusion bracket the

thesis.

smooth progression of

claims from introduction

to conclusion.

compelling manner.

Proposed Variables
(Quantitative Studies)
or Phenomena
(Qualitative Studies)

Proposed Variables

(Quantitative Studies) or

Phenomena (Qualitative

Studies)

0 points

An identification and

definition of the

proposed variables or

phenomena is either

missing or not evident to

the reader.

21.9 points

An identification and

definition of the

proposed variables or

phenomena is illogical or

inaccurate. The

proposed variables or

phenomena are not

supported via the

identified problem

space. Argument lacks

consistent unity. There

are obvious flaws in the

logic.

24.6 points

An identification and

definition of the

proposed variables or

phenomena is cursory.

There is loose support

for the proposed

variables or phenomena

via the identified

problem space. The

research used for

support is outdated.

Argument logically, but

not thoroughly, supports

the purpose. Sources

used are credible.

Introduction and

conclusion bracket the

thesis.

27.3 points

An identification and

definition of the

proposed variables or

phenomena is thorough.

There is reasonable

support for the

proposed variables or

phenomena via the

problem space. The

research used for

support is current.

Argument shows logical

progressions.

Techniques of

argumentation are

evident. There is a

smooth progression of

claims from introduction

to conclusion.

30 points

An identification and

definition of the

proposed variables or

phenomena is thorough.

There is clearly

articulated and relevant

support for the

proposed variables or

phenomena via the

problem space. Scholarly

research is used for

support and is current

or seminal. Argument is

clear and convincing,

presenting a persuasive

claim in a distinctive and

compelling manner.

Proposed Problem
Statement and
Defense

Proposed Problem

Statement and Defense

0 points

A problem statement

and defense of the

proposed problem

statement is either

missing or not evident.

29.2 points

A problem statement

defense of the proposed

problem statement is

illogical or inaccurate.

The proposed research

problem does not

emerge from a synthesis

of the limitations or

future study ideas from

the cited literature.

Argument lacks

consistent unity. There

are obvious flaws in the

logic.

32.8 points

A problem statement

defense of the proposed

problem statement is

cursory. The research

used for support is

outdated. There is a

vague connection to the

limitations or future

study ideas from the

cited literature.

Argument logically, but

not thoroughly, supports

the purpose. Sources

used are credible.

Introduction and

conclusion bracket the

thesis.

36.4 points

A problem statement

defense of the proposed

problem statement is

thorough. The research

used for support is

current. There is a

connection to the

limitations or future

study ideas from the

cited literature.

Argument shows logical

progressions.

Techniques of

argumentation are

evident. There is a

smooth progression of

claims from introduction

to conclusion.

40 points

A problem statement

defense of the proposed

problem statement is

thorough. Scholarly

research is used for

support and is current

or seminal. The

proposed research

problem directly

emerges from a

synthesis of the

limitations or future

study ideas from the

cited literature.

Argument is clear and

convincing, presenting a

persuasive claim in a

distinctive and

compelling manner.

Mechanics of Writing

Mechanics of Writing

0 points

Mechanical errors are

pervasive enough that

they impede

communication of

meaning. Inappropriate

word choice and/or

sentence construction

are used.

7.3 points

Frequent and repetitive

mechanical errors

distract the reader.

Inconsistencies in

language choice

(register), sentence

structure, and/or word

choice are present.

8.2 points

Some mechanical errors

or typos are present, but

are not overly distracting

to the reader. Correct

sentence structure and

audience-appropriate

language are used.

9.1 points

Prose is largely free of

mechanical errors,

although a few may be

present. A variety of

sentence structures and

effective figures of

speech are used.

10 points

Writer is clearly in

command of standard,

written, academic

English.

APA Format

APA Format

0 points

Required format is rarely

followed correctly. No

reference page is

included. No in-text

7.3 points

Required format

elements are missing or

incorrect. A lack of

control with formatting

8.2 points

Required format is

generally correct.

Reference page is

included and lists

9.1 points

Required format is used,

but minor errors are

present. Reference page

is present and includes

10 points

In-text citations and a

reference page are

complete and correct.

The documentation of

8/19/24, 10:28 PM

Page 3 of 3about:srcdoc

citations are used. is apparent. Reference

page is present.

However, in-text

citations are

inconsistently used.

sources used in the

paper. Sources are

appropriately

documented though

some errors are present.

all cited sources.

Documentation is

appropriate and citation

style is usually correct.

cited sources is free of

error.

© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

ICL 7059: WORKSHOP LESSON

 Activity: Workshop Model for 8th grade math Create a lesson cycle using the Workshop Model for one or more of your learning objectives that you created in Module 1. Lesson Plan must include: Content Area and Grade Level – 8th grade math Learning Objective(s) Instructional Strategy(ies) Answer: How was culturally

Health Care and Wellness Provider and Faith Diversity First Draft

PLEASE NO CHAT GPT OR AI In 1,250-1,500 words, provide a comparative analysis of the two different faiths, reinforcing major themes with insights gained from your research. 1. Answer the following basic worldview questions for Christianity  and the faith you selected. 1. What is prime reality? 2. What is the nature

Spanish

In six sentences, in Spanish, summarize what Luis has shared about his family. Do not use a translator. Your sentences will be short and simple. You should use the vocabulary and structures modeled. Your summary should contain the most important pieces of what Luis shared. 

Race and Ethnic Inequality

 Race and Ethnic Inequality  This week, you should write a reflection responding to the topic: “Race and Ethnic Inequality.” You should demonstrate what you have learned about racial inequality from this chapter, discuss your response to the reading, and pose any questions or critiques. You should draw from all the

Early Intervention of Developmental Disabilities

  Students will select a vignette about a family with a child who is eligible to receive early intervention services. Students will complete a blank IFSP form will all relevant information based on the case of Kim. You can add in any information that may not be addressed in the

Early Intervention of Developmental Disabilities

  Students will select a vignette about a family with a child who is eligible to receive early intervention services. Students will complete a blank IFSP form will all relevant information based on the case of Kim. You can add in any information that may not be addressed in the

brumsey

  Students will identify the cultures and societies (plural) of the United States. Students will evaluate the place of the United States within a larger global context.

neva

  1.  When it came to building empires in the Americas, the Europeans had  some advantages.  Explain what they were, and how they served as  advantages. 2. What was the Columbian exchange, and how was it global in nature? 3.  How did the Spanish transform the land once controlled by

neva

  1. How did the Russian Empire change the lives of its conquered peoples and the land itself? 2.  What were some of the distinct features of the empire established by the Qing Dynasty? 3. What were some of the distinct features of the Mughal Empire? 4.  What was the

des

Q1 topics.  Asia After World War II                The Korean War, A History.  With Bruce Cumings  Q2 Topics  American Expeditionary Forces in Siberia, Russia | 1918-1920 | US Army Documentary                1917: Lenin, Wilson, and the Birth of the New World Disorder                  

c mitchell

  . How did the Russian Empire change the lives of its conquered peoples and the land itself? 2.  What were some of the distinct features of the empire established by the Qing Dynasty? 3. What were some of the distinct features of the Mughal Empire? 4.  What was the

Plan Management

Draft Project Management Plan: Applying Contemporary Models to Develop a Change Embracing Culture Using your previous formative assessment titled “Paper: Applying Organizational Models to an Organizational Context” and insights from your recent Learning Activities, you will develop a Draft Project Management Plan. For this deliverable, you will continue with the

Discussion 4 AM

Assignment 4 – Differentiated Lesson (25 points) Due Week 8 After reviewing the SIOP and sample lesson plans for the grade levels of your choice, develop a differentiated lesson plan in any of the following content areas: mathematics, science, social studies, arts, language arts, health education or physical education. The

Education Assignment 3 AM

Assignment 3 – Additional language learning through apps (25 points) Due Week 7 An essential part of learning to work with English language learners is to understand some of the processes in learning a new language. Therefore, you will be learning a new language of your choice on at least

question assigment

Module 5: The Teacher as Part of the Learning Environment- Task (Select ONE from Choice A or B) · Collect ECERS-3 Data and record scores by clicking this link:  ECERS-3 REPORTING FORMLinks to an external site. · Create and submit a  PowerPoint Presentation (PPT) that summarizes the findings from your observations

research

research Locating educational research from scholarly sources allows you access to knowledge based on empirical data. After studying the course content in this module, you are equipped to identify educational research and locate scholarly sources. You can locate and read scholarly sources in your professional positions to answer questions and

article review

article review Choose one: Student Motivation  OR  Teacher Expectations Search for and summarize an article that explores the role of student motivation in student achievement  or  the role of teacher expectations in student learning.  When typing an Article Review, follow this format and include the bolded headings: 1. List the

ENV 4303

Please view attachment In these last units, we covered a number of important concepts related to environmental technology. For this assignment, you are asked to create a PowerPoint Presentation that presents an overview of these main concepts to present at a webinar for a fictitious not-for-profit organization. The organization promotes