Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

psych 421

Chapter 5 – Artificially Modeling the mind (200 words)

Hello; for this week, please, read chapter 5 and answer the following questions:

1.
How do artificial neural network models work alongside neuroscientific techniques to help us study the brain? What do they add to our understanding?

2.
Why do you think training is such a key part of neural network modeling? How does it shape the way these models work?

3.
How similar do you think artificial neural networks are to the real brain? Are there aspects where they feel biologically realistic or where they fall short?

4.
What are the main features of artificial neural networks? How would you compare them to the physical symbol system model of information processing?

Chapter 6 – The Dynamical Mind (200 words)

During this week, please, read Chapter 6 and answer the following questions:

1.
What’s the main idea behind the dynamical systems hypothesis? Do you find it convincing, and why or why not?

2.
How does the example of the Watt governor help Van Gelder make his point? Can you think of other examples that might support his argument?

3.
Dynamical models seem great for studying how skills like walking develop. Do you think they could also be useful for exploring other cognitive processes? Why or why not?

4.
The A-not-B error is a fascinating phenomenon. Do you think there might be other plausible cognitive explanations for why it happens?

Resources for Chapter 6, others are attached

Chapter 7 – Bayesian Systems in the mind (200 words)

For this week you will read Chapter 7. After that, answer the following questions:

1.
Do you think the Bayesian idea that beliefs can have degrees of certainty makes sense? Why or why not?

2.
Can you explain how Bayes’s Rule works in simple terms? Why do you think it’s so widely used?

3.
What’s the connection between Bayesian thinking and Gestalt approaches to perception? How do they help us understand how we make sense of what we see?

4.
What’s the challenge posed by the St. Petersburg game? Do you think distinguishing between monetary value and utility helps solve it?

Chapter 8 – Modules to Build a Mind (200 words)

For this week, please, read Chapter 8 and answer the following questions.

1.
What are the main differences between the three agent architectures described in the text? How would you explain these differences to someone new to the topic?

2.
What are the key features of modular processing, according to Fodor? Why do you think these characteristics are important?

3.
How does the massive modularity thesis differ from Fodor’s ideas about modularity? Which approach do you find more convincing, and why?

4.
Why do Cosmides and Tooby argue that a module for detecting cheaters evolved? How convincing do you find their reasoning?

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Discussion board post

For this discussion, you will articulate your process for approaching a literature review that will help refine your annotated bibliography. 

Spring 2025

I am hoping to reconnect with Sheryl Hogan Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title Putting It All Together Directions: Read the directions carefully for each section and completely fill in the table for all 4 parts. Part 1: Source Review For Part I, review Adira, et al.’s (2022)

Excel

Communications Template Stakeholder Name Role Information Timeframe Media Responsible for Updates Responsible for Delivery

home work

Please follow instructions and No Ai . Please no copyright LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Funder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle (9th ed.). W. W. Norton. Chapter 9, “Basics of Psychoanalysis” Chapter 10, “Psychoanalysis After Freud: Neo-Freudians, Object Relations, and Current Research” Walden University Writing Center. (2021). Using quotations, part

Presentation

Powerpoint presentation instructions are listed below  Presentation Grading Rubric PSYC2430 Name: Course: Title: Quality of Visual Aids ___/4 Script/knowledge of Material ___/3 Title and Hypothesis ___/3 Variables and Reasoning ___/3 Previous Research Review ___/3 Participants and Material ___/3 Procedure ___/3 Creativity ___/3 TOTAL ________ / 25 · Make sure to

week 6 discussion

  Collapse Describe the variety of ways that one can assess the validity of an instrument in terms of our self-esteem measure. If we were creating a new measure of self-esteem, what is the process that we would use to validate this measure?

psychology 1

Skip to main content My Account Page path Home StraighterLine Moodle Username Password Remember username Log in Forgotten your username or password? Cookies must be enabled in your browser Some courses may allow guest access Log in as a guest © 2023 StraighterLine. All rights reserved

Psychology ADVERTISEMENT ASSIGNMENT

   Build upon the topic selected in the Psychoeducational Group Plan Assignment to focus on developing a psychotherapy group. The first step in this process is to create a recruitment flyer that effectively communicates the purpose and structure of the group while attracting suitable members.    Watch from 1:05:35 to 1:23:15.

Impact of Life Experiences on Development

How does life experiences impact development? The Impact of Life Experiences on Development Complete a 7- to 9-page (not including title page and references) paper with the following criteria: Choose four events from your life which you believe had a significant impact on your development. There must be at least

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Analysis of the Terms: Polarization and Groupthink After reading the module and the assigned references, students will complete a written assignment where they explain and analyze, in their own words, the terms  Polarization and  Groupthink. The task includes: · Providing a concrete example of how a group demonstrates each

Group Dynamics

see attachment    Effects of Groupthink After reading the module and the article by Smith (or the article selected by the course instructor), each student will critically analyze the material and critically address the following question and points for analysis: Article:  Smith, T. E. (2016). The road to high-quality decision-making:

Car & pow

ECED 6260: Career Development and Appraisal Spring 2025 Career Project Rubric Total Points: 100 You will create an individual presentation that includes a written portion, visual component, and class presentation/powerpoint submission. Each student will be required to write a paper and to create a powerpoint presentation. A very general guide

home work

Please follow instructions . No Ai LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Funder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle (9th ed.). W. W. Norton. Chapter 5, “Traits and Types: The Big Five and Beyond” Chapter 6, “Personality Stability, Development, and Change” Truity. ( (2021). Truity.com Locate the Personality Tests drop down menu

Identify Different Theories of Gender Development

Social learning theory and cognitive development theory have valid criticisms when applied to gender development. However, when viewed together, they do a fairly good job of describing how gender develops in children.  Studying and reviewing these two theories for your assignment this week will help you prepare for your signature

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Content Analysis After studying, analyzing, and reflecting on the module’s content and references, students will: · Write an analysis on how important they consider observation and analysis of group functioning to be for the effectiveness and achievement of the group’s goals. · Provide a supported response to the

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Use of Observation Keys After studying this module, students will: · Identify and select a type of group to describe and analyze its forms of communication. · To structure their writing, students will use the key questions for group observation presented in the module. · Once their contribution

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Reading Analysis Students must read the articles by Gervits et al. (2016) and Felps et al. (2006). Gervits, F., Eberhard, K., & Scheutz, M. (2016). Team communication as a collaborative process.  Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3(62), 1-14. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00062  to an external site. Felps, W., Mitchell, T.R.,