Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

psych 422

Diagnostic Evaluation Draft Report 

NOTE! If you do a great job on this draft and would like to make no changes and keep the same grade for your final report, that’s fine with me.  If you earn 100, I’ll do that for you automatically.  If you don’t submit a final diagnostic evaluation, I’ll use the score from your draft as your final evaluation score. It would help if you add the comment “please use my midterm evaluation grade for my final evaluation grade” just so we’re clear. 

Diagnostic Evaluation Draft Report Template – you must use this document
Download Diagnostic Evaluation Draft Report Template – you must use this document


Diagnostic Evaluation Draft Report
: You will create a diagnostic evaluation draft report using the template above.  Please assess and diagnose 
a fictional character from a well-known movie, book, or television program that has a diagnosis covered in the class.  IMAGINE THAT THE CHARACTER HAS LEFT THE MOVIE/BOOK/SHOW AND WALKED INTO YOUR THERAPY OFFICE.  How would that character respond to your questions?

Submission Guidelines: Reports must be submitted through Canvas.  Plagiarism or other forms of academic dishonesty will not be tolerated and will result in at least an automatic “F” for the assignment (also see FSU regulations).  

Please include the following statement on every assignment: “I hereby declare that I have not utilized any generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools or technologies in the creation of this work.”

Diagnostic Evaluation Guidelines

· Please use the provided report template. 

· Please address all of the components for each section.

· If the book, movie, or TV show does not provide you with much information about your character, it may be wise to select a character from another source that provides more detail.

· It is also permissible to take some creative license and fill in the blanks with made-up information if you feel it will bring your character to life.

· For this reason, I ask that you only choose fictional (not real) characters. Please do not choose a book/show/movie that portrays the life of a real person, alive or deceased.   

· While it is helpful to report some information about the client’s family and friends, please avoid the mistake of over-analyzing a family member. Keep the focus on the client. 

· I DO NOT need a plot summary. Only share what is relevant to the client’s diagnosis and DO NOT start detailing what happened in the movie.  I should feel like I am reading about a real person that you met, not about a movie or show.  

· Please follow APA format where necessary. Cite sources.  Provide a references page which includes the full citation for the move/book/show. 

Need help finding a movie? Here are some resources…

to an external site.

to an external site.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Discussion board post

For this discussion, you will articulate your process for approaching a literature review that will help refine your annotated bibliography. 

Spring 2025

I am hoping to reconnect with Sheryl Hogan Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title Putting It All Together Directions: Read the directions carefully for each section and completely fill in the table for all 4 parts. Part 1: Source Review For Part I, review Adira, et al.’s (2022)

Excel

Communications Template Stakeholder Name Role Information Timeframe Media Responsible for Updates Responsible for Delivery

home work

Please follow instructions and No Ai . Please no copyright LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Funder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle (9th ed.). W. W. Norton. Chapter 9, “Basics of Psychoanalysis” Chapter 10, “Psychoanalysis After Freud: Neo-Freudians, Object Relations, and Current Research” Walden University Writing Center. (2021). Using quotations, part

Presentation

Powerpoint presentation instructions are listed below  Presentation Grading Rubric PSYC2430 Name: Course: Title: Quality of Visual Aids ___/4 Script/knowledge of Material ___/3 Title and Hypothesis ___/3 Variables and Reasoning ___/3 Previous Research Review ___/3 Participants and Material ___/3 Procedure ___/3 Creativity ___/3 TOTAL ________ / 25 · Make sure to

week 6 discussion

  Collapse Describe the variety of ways that one can assess the validity of an instrument in terms of our self-esteem measure. If we were creating a new measure of self-esteem, what is the process that we would use to validate this measure?

psychology 1

Skip to main content My Account Page path Home StraighterLine Moodle Username Password Remember username Log in Forgotten your username or password? Cookies must be enabled in your browser Some courses may allow guest access Log in as a guest © 2023 StraighterLine. All rights reserved

Psychology ADVERTISEMENT ASSIGNMENT

   Build upon the topic selected in the Psychoeducational Group Plan Assignment to focus on developing a psychotherapy group. The first step in this process is to create a recruitment flyer that effectively communicates the purpose and structure of the group while attracting suitable members.    Watch from 1:05:35 to 1:23:15.

Impact of Life Experiences on Development

How does life experiences impact development? The Impact of Life Experiences on Development Complete a 7- to 9-page (not including title page and references) paper with the following criteria: Choose four events from your life which you believe had a significant impact on your development. There must be at least

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Analysis of the Terms: Polarization and Groupthink After reading the module and the assigned references, students will complete a written assignment where they explain and analyze, in their own words, the terms  Polarization and  Groupthink. The task includes: · Providing a concrete example of how a group demonstrates each

Group Dynamics

see attachment    Effects of Groupthink After reading the module and the article by Smith (or the article selected by the course instructor), each student will critically analyze the material and critically address the following question and points for analysis: Article:  Smith, T. E. (2016). The road to high-quality decision-making:

Car & pow

ECED 6260: Career Development and Appraisal Spring 2025 Career Project Rubric Total Points: 100 You will create an individual presentation that includes a written portion, visual component, and class presentation/powerpoint submission. Each student will be required to write a paper and to create a powerpoint presentation. A very general guide

home work

Please follow instructions . No Ai LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Funder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle (9th ed.). W. W. Norton. Chapter 5, “Traits and Types: The Big Five and Beyond” Chapter 6, “Personality Stability, Development, and Change” Truity. ( (2021). Truity.com Locate the Personality Tests drop down menu

Identify Different Theories of Gender Development

Social learning theory and cognitive development theory have valid criticisms when applied to gender development. However, when viewed together, they do a fairly good job of describing how gender develops in children.  Studying and reviewing these two theories for your assignment this week will help you prepare for your signature

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Content Analysis After studying, analyzing, and reflecting on the module’s content and references, students will: · Write an analysis on how important they consider observation and analysis of group functioning to be for the effectiveness and achievement of the group’s goals. · Provide a supported response to the

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Use of Observation Keys After studying this module, students will: · Identify and select a type of group to describe and analyze its forms of communication. · To structure their writing, students will use the key questions for group observation presented in the module. · Once their contribution

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Reading Analysis Students must read the articles by Gervits et al. (2016) and Felps et al. (2006). Gervits, F., Eberhard, K., & Scheutz, M. (2016). Team communication as a collaborative process.  Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3(62), 1-14. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00062  to an external site. Felps, W., Mitchell, T.R.,