GRADING RUBRIC FOR PAPER II (35 points total)
|
|
|
|
|
1. Demographics:
|
reports percentages of demographic characteristics, including gender, age, and ethnicity/race, and reports descriptive statistics (means, SD, frequencies) for all including the |
reports percentages of most demographic characteristics, & reports most descriptive statistics (means, SD, frequencies, |
omits many demographic characteristics as noted in first column, & reports few descriptive statistics (means, SD, frequencies). leaves out the |
section is either missing or contains many errors and omissions and is clear that it does not follow the instructions provided. |
2. Materials & Procedure:
|
mentions informed consent & debriefing. thoroughly describes dependent & independent variables, including scales used. |
mentions informed consent & debriefing. mostly describes dependent & independent variables. may omit scales used. |
does not mention informed consent &/or debriefing. superficially describes dependent & independent variables. omits scales used. |
section is not present or contains many omissions as described in the first columns |
3. Results:
|
reports at least two different analyses, including one chi-square and at least one ANOVA. appropriately reports the manipulation check. includes means and SDs for each level of IV. italicizes |
reports at least two different analyses, including one chi-square and at least one ANOVA. appropriately reports the manipulation check & ANOVA. includes most means and SDs. italicizes most |
Reports only one analysis, &/or omits ANOVAs. inappropriately reports the manipulation check &/or ANOVA. excludes means and SDs for some levels of IV. does not italicize |
section is either missing or contains many egregious errors, signaling that instructions provided were not closely followed. |
4. Discussion:
|
reminds reader of hypothesis. mentions whether findings supported hypothesis. offers interpretation of results. very well written. |
reminds reader of hypothesis. may not mention whether findings supported hypothesis. offers superficial interpretation of results. mostly well written. |
does not remind reader of hypothesis &/or does not mention whether findings supported or did not support hypothesis. does not offer interpretation of results. poorly written. |
section is either missing or does not fulfill criteria as noted on left columns. |
5. Tables:
|
paper has tables for gender, ethnicity, & age. has crosstabs table (with %) plus chi square test. has descriptives table, the ANOVA table, and the post hoc table for ANOVA(s) and t-tests, as appropriate. |
is missing no more than one of the tables indicated in the first column. |
is missing two or more tables, as indicated in the first column. |
section is missing or is missing most tables, as indicated in the first column. |
|
|
|
|
|
6. General Paper Format:
|
paper (including headers, the main body, page numbers, and references) is consistent font, double spaced, with 1” margins, paragraphs ½”, and aligned left. |
formatting is very good, but has some minor mistakes in the font type or size, spacing, margin, margin size, or alignment. |
formatting has many errors in font type and/or size, spacing, margin, margin size, and/or alignment. |
formatting is consistently incorrect in many respects including errors in font type and/or size, spacing, margin, margin size, and/or alignment. |
7. Paper II Format:
|
the word “Methods”, “Participants”, “Results,” and “Discussion” are formatted according to checklist. |
the word “Methods”, “Participants”, “Results,” and “Discussion” are formatted according to checklist with only minor errors. |
the word “Methods”, “Participants”, “Results,” and “Discussion” are not formatted according to checklist and have major errors. |
the formatting for the subheadings does not follow the formatting instructions provided in checklist. |