Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Psychology Assignment

please follow up with the instruction . No AI

Due Jul 20 by 10:59pm
Points 90
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 1
Allowed Attempts 2

New Attempt

Back to Week at a Glance
(

To understand those around you and society as a whole, it is important to understand yourself—that
is, to have self-knowledge. Conversely, your understanding of self is informed by your social world.
Development of self-knowledge is influenced by family and those around you, culture, and the
countless experiences in one’s life.

For this Assignment, you examine different facets of your self-knowledge.

SELF-KNOWLEDGE
(

media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

RESOURCES

Resources

 

Open-Source Psychometrics Project. (n.d.). Self-monitoring scale
( [Interactive].

Time Estimate: 10 min
High5 Content and Review Team. (2024, October 17). What is self-monitoring?
Examples & how to do it ( . High5 Test.

Time Estimate: 10 min
Garcia, S. & Halldorsson, A. (2025). Social comparison ( .
In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook series: Psychology. DEF
publishers.

Read from the beginning through “Direction of Comparison”.
Time Estimate: 7 min

Copyright © 2025 by R. R. Biswas-Diener and E. Diener is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except
where otherwise noted.

LibreText Social Sciences. (n.d.). Principles of social psychology.

Chapter 1.2, Affect, Behavior, and Cognition (Summary) (PDF)
(
(
download_frd=1)

Time Estimate: 1 min
Walden University, LLC. (2023). Cognitive dissonance (
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html) [Interactive]. Walden
University Canvas.

Time Estimate: 15 min
Luttrell, A. (2016, July 7). Cognitive dissonance theory – A crash course
( [Video]. YouTube.

Time Estimate: 7 min

PSYC_2005_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

Submit a 300- to 500-word paper, in which you:

Based on Open-Source Psychometrics Project (2019)
( and Self-monitoring scale (2024)
( , define self-monitoring in your own words, and
provide an example in which you exhibited high or low self-monitoring.
Based on Garcia and Halldorsson (2025) ( , define upward or
downward comparison, and provide an example in which you engaged in that type of social
comparison.

Identify who you compared yourself to.
Describe a positive or negative effect of that social comparison on yourself.

Based on LibreText Social Sciences. (n.d.)
(
(download_frd=1) ,
the learning activity on cognitive dissonance (
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html) , and Luttrell’s (2016) video

( , briefly describe a time you
experienced cognitive dissonance. Explain the source of your cognitive dissonance.

To demonstrate what you learned this week, be sure to support your work with information from
the Learning Resources.

Be sure to review the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to understand the specific grading criteria
your Instructor will use to evaluate your work.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for originality. To check your
draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment.

1. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
2. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

BY DAY 7

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Criteria Ratings Pts

Definition of
self-
monitoring
and example
in which
student
exhibited high
or low self-
monitoring

20 pts

Definition of
upward or
downward
social
comparison
and example
in which
student
engaged in
upward or
downward
comparison,
including who
student
compared
self to and a
positive or
negative
effect of the
social
comparison

25 pts

Description of
an
experience of
cognitive
dissonance
and the

25 pts

20 to >17.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.

17 to >13.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
This component is
addressed. Further
development would
strengthen this
component.

13 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.

25 to >21.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.

21 to >17.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
This component is
addressed. Further
development would
strengthen this
component.

17 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.

25 to >21.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.

21 to >17.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
This component is
addressed. Further
development would

17 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.

Criteria Ratings Pts

source of
cognitive
dissonance

Format and
writing

10 pts

Timeliness

10 pts

Total Points: 90

strengthen this
component.

10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)

Any spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
deviations from Standard
Academic English are
minor and do not affect
clear communication.   
Work includes more than
one explicit mention of
concepts or ideas from the
required sources, and an
effort to cite the original
source was made if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions.

8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)

The submission contains
few spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
deviations from Standard
Academic English, OR
these deviations do not
affect clear
communication.     Work
includes at least one
explicit mention of a
concept or idea from the
required sources if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions and a clear
attempt at citing the source
has been made.

6 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)

Multiple spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
deviations from Standard
Academic English affect
clear communication.    
Work does not include any
explicit mention of
concepts or ideas from the
required sources, OR it
contains one or more
explicit mentions of a
concept or idea from the
required sources, if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions, but without
attempting to cite the
source.

10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)

The assignment is
submitted according to
posted due dates and
times or late with prior
consent from the
instructor.

8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)

The assignment is
submitted within the
allowed time.

6 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)

The assignment is not
submitted on time.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Topic 1 DQ 2 Response

Topic 1 DQ 2 Response to Josiah Mastriano Humanity has a diverse set of worldviews: from atheistic, to polytheistic, to monotheistic. These differences in perspectives narrow even further into cultural diversity, which is something that should be celebrated as a clinical mental health counselor (GCU, 2025a). However, a student needs

DQ1 Response

DQ1 Response to peer Katie Mayorga  My selected video was over navigating. I found this video provided a decent amount of overview into properly navigating the LMS, including class calendar, discussion boards, the syllabus, just to name a few. I found it particularly useful to learn that I can view

Topic 1 DQ 3

Assessment Description Throughout the counseling program, you will be using Zoom to demonstrate counseling skills and attend synchronous components. Please review the two Class Resources “GCU Zoom Resources: Counseling and Social Work” and “Zoom Access” to answer this discussion question. What concerns do you have using Zoom in your counseling

DE Week 4 Discussion

As our homes, cities, and vehicles become more digitally connected, they generate vast amounts of data that can serve as digital evidence. The evolution of smart technology impacts digital forensics and investigations. For this discussion consider how automated systems in our living spaces, urban environments, and transportation networks create digital

Psychology Homework

Week 7 Assignment: Decision Making Analysis Paper 1. Create a one-paragraph hypothetical scenario that illustrates one of the following types of dilemmas or challenges. ● A moral dilemma (e.g., deciding whether to report a coworker for unethical behavior) ● A practical problem (e.g., choosing between job offers with different benefits)

Psychology

Write as a freshman in college Week 7 Assignment: Decision-Making Analysis Paper Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Available 1. Create a one-paragraph hypothetical scenario that illustrates one of the following types of dilemmas or challenges. ● A moral dilemma (e.g., deciding whether to report

Psychology Research

Need help on understanding research methods  Your Name Here Capella University PSYC4600: Research Methods in Psychology Research Project Part 3: Final Research Report Instructor Month, Year Literature Review [Enter your revised literature review here. Incorporate feedback given from previous assignments.]  Method  [Enter your revised method section here. Incorporate feedback given

Psychology

Write as a freshman in college Week 6 Assignment: Mental Health Disorder Paper Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Available Dec 1 at 12am – Dec 10 at 11:59pm Compose a 2- to 3-page paper that reviews a mental health disorder

APPLIED PROJECT

1 Applied Project General Project Guidelines: 1. Papers must be written using the current APA Publication Manual. Papers must be five to seven typed double-spaced pages. 2. Papers must include a minimum of five relevant resources, appropriately cited. Project: Stress Management for Salespeople Frank Taylor’s automobile dealership has a number

Drug Addiction

Adr Assignment description:  (Total 36 points) Please select one chapter (e.g., psychological health, drug abuse, nutrition, etc.) covered during this course to create a PSA video using Adobe Creative Rush. Your presentation must be between 60-90 seconds in length and include both audio and video. It should cover important facts and

assig 2

attached Assignment #2 (See due date in the schedule file in Modules or Course Calendar)  In this assignment you will identify 3 effective practices or  interventions that have been proven in the professional literature to be effective with children with special needs and 3 ineffective practices used with this population.

Psychology Week 1 home assignment

Help with homework Assignment see instructions attached  Week 1 This module’s Doctoral Degree Coach™ tasks and the Learning Resources introduced important skills, such as evaluating resources you find online, using database search skills to find the resources you need in the library, evaluating the reliability and credibility of authors and

psych L. Blue

This assignment three parts, answer each question in full or you will not get full credit. Part A 600 words (country: United States) Refer to the conformity and social norms section starting on p. 533 in your textbook. Then review the following two articles in Psychology Today: How Cultures Make

Mod 8 Self-Reflection

see attached Assignment Overview: This self-assessment paper invites you to reflect deeply on how your personal ethics, background, and values intersect with the ethical standards of the social work or human services profession. Ethical dilemmas are a natural part of the field, and understanding how your own identity and experiences

Report and powerpoint

ECED 6270-HYB- Counseling Diverse Populations Cultural Learning Experience- Powerpoint Presentation Student: Class Presentation-PowerPoint- (40 Points) Date of Presentation: Submitted on time: (10 pts) Powerpoint organized and free from errors: (10 pts) Presentation Delivery: (10 pts.) Provides thoughtful reflection and demonstrates learning of the target person/culture: (10 pts.) Total (40 pts):

College Algebra I-DBX-DL05

  Objective: To recognize search tools appropriate for specific purposes.                    To perform a search given an author, a journal, and a topic.