Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Psychology Assignment

please follow up with the instruction . No AI

Due Jul 20 by 10:59pm
Points 90
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 1
Allowed Attempts 2

New Attempt

Back to Week at a Glance
(

To understand those around you and society as a whole, it is important to understand yourself—that
is, to have self-knowledge. Conversely, your understanding of self is informed by your social world.
Development of self-knowledge is influenced by family and those around you, culture, and the
countless experiences in one’s life.

For this Assignment, you examine different facets of your self-knowledge.

SELF-KNOWLEDGE
(

media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)

RESOURCES

Resources

 

Open-Source Psychometrics Project. (n.d.). Self-monitoring scale
( [Interactive].

Time Estimate: 10 min
High5 Content and Review Team. (2024, October 17). What is self-monitoring?
Examples & how to do it ( . High5 Test.

Time Estimate: 10 min
Garcia, S. & Halldorsson, A. (2025). Social comparison ( .
In R. Biswas-Diener & E. Diener (Eds), Noba textbook series: Psychology. DEF
publishers.

Read from the beginning through “Direction of Comparison”.
Time Estimate: 7 min

Copyright © 2025 by R. R. Biswas-Diener and E. Diener is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except
where otherwise noted.

LibreText Social Sciences. (n.d.). Principles of social psychology.

Chapter 1.2, Affect, Behavior, and Cognition (Summary) (PDF)
(
(
download_frd=1)

Time Estimate: 1 min
Walden University, LLC. (2023). Cognitive dissonance (
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html) [Interactive]. Walden
University Canvas.

Time Estimate: 15 min
Luttrell, A. (2016, July 7). Cognitive dissonance theory – A crash course
( [Video]. YouTube.

Time Estimate: 7 min

PSYC_2005_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

Submit a 300- to 500-word paper, in which you:

Based on Open-Source Psychometrics Project (2019)
( and Self-monitoring scale (2024)
( , define self-monitoring in your own words, and
provide an example in which you exhibited high or low self-monitoring.
Based on Garcia and Halldorsson (2025) ( , define upward or
downward comparison, and provide an example in which you engaged in that type of social
comparison.

Identify who you compared yourself to.
Describe a positive or negative effect of that social comparison on yourself.

Based on LibreText Social Sciences. (n.d.)
(
(download_frd=1) ,
the learning activity on cognitive dissonance (
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/2005/CD/index.html) , and Luttrell’s (2016) video

( , briefly describe a time you
experienced cognitive dissonance. Explain the source of your cognitive dissonance.

To demonstrate what you learned this week, be sure to support your work with information from
the Learning Resources.

Be sure to review the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to understand the specific grading criteria
your Instructor will use to evaluate your work.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for originality. To check your
draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment.

1. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
2. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

BY DAY 7

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Criteria Ratings Pts

Definition of
self-
monitoring
and example
in which
student
exhibited high
or low self-
monitoring

20 pts

Definition of
upward or
downward
social
comparison
and example
in which
student
engaged in
upward or
downward
comparison,
including who
student
compared
self to and a
positive or
negative
effect of the
social
comparison

25 pts

Description of
an
experience of
cognitive
dissonance
and the

25 pts

20 to >17.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.

17 to >13.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
This component is
addressed. Further
development would
strengthen this
component.

13 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.

25 to >21.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.

21 to >17.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
This component is
addressed. Further
development would
strengthen this
component.

17 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.

25 to >21.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.

21 to >17.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
This component is
addressed. Further
development would

17 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.

Criteria Ratings Pts

source of
cognitive
dissonance

Format and
writing

10 pts

Timeliness

10 pts

Total Points: 90

strengthen this
component.

10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)

Any spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
deviations from Standard
Academic English are
minor and do not affect
clear communication.   
Work includes more than
one explicit mention of
concepts or ideas from the
required sources, and an
effort to cite the original
source was made if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions.

8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)

The submission contains
few spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
deviations from Standard
Academic English, OR
these deviations do not
affect clear
communication.     Work
includes at least one
explicit mention of a
concept or idea from the
required sources if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions and a clear
attempt at citing the source
has been made.

6 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)

Multiple spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
deviations from Standard
Academic English affect
clear communication.    
Work does not include any
explicit mention of
concepts or ideas from the
required sources, OR it
contains one or more
explicit mentions of a
concept or idea from the
required sources, if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions, but without
attempting to cite the
source.

10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)

The assignment is
submitted according to
posted due dates and
times or late with prior
consent from the
instructor.

8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)

The assignment is
submitted within the
allowed time.

6 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)

The assignment is not
submitted on time.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Discussion Response

 I need a response to two discussion questions.   Discussion Post Guidelines: · Acknowledge your classmates’ posts. · Build upon these posts by providing additional details, statistics, ideas, perspectives, or links to interesting, relevant articles. Conclude with a question or new idea to further stimulate the discussion 1. The interaction of

6530-7a1

  Submit your completed Intervention Plan in which you: Identify one issue you want to work on with your client. Write a goal statement in SMART goal format. Identify and describe an evidence-based intervention/treatment model or approach that you want to implement.

Human Sexuality

see attachment  Instructions Make a short learning reflection by answering the following questions with 3 to 5 sentences: 1. What is the most important thing you have learned from the information presented in modules 6 and 7? 2. What relevance do you see for your future career? 3. Briefly share

Article Review

How to write an article review on Professionalism, Ethics, and Value-Based Conflicts in Counseling?

Prof Double R

COMPLETE THE TEMPLATE THAT IS UPLOADED BELOW PSY 328 Module Two Journal Template First, you may want to revisit your submission for the Module One Journal assignment. Next, complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information. Describe what a psychoanalyst like Freud or Jung would be

Psychology Assignment

Please no AI . Do the work right and follow directions Due Jul 16 75 points View Split Screen All Search entries or author… Newest First Back to Week at a Glance ( For decades, social psychologists have studied the many ways people form, maintain, and change their attitudes. Attitude

AQR&A Week 7 Journal

For this week’s Journal entry, respond to the following two prompts: Regarding the research plan, address the following: What are the best sources for finding participants who fit your criteria for inclusion in the sample? Who do you need to contact to get permission to distribute your announcement? How do

AQR&A Week 7 Journal

In this week’s Workshop, visit your unique thread and post a response to the following: Outline your proposed interview procedures, providing justification of each procedure included in your list. Be sure to consider and share your plan for the following: Who you are considering interviewing Incorporation of the exact verbiage

AQR&A Week 7 Assignnment 1

Revise your interview instrument based on the feedback you receive from your classmates and Instructor. Prepare a document that includes the following components: A brief description of how you will recruit two participants A protocol that includes the invitation, informed consent (using the verbatim document from the Walden IRB), interview

Psychology Assignment

Please no AI follow the instructions.. Due Sunday by 10:59pm Points 90 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Attempts 0 Allowed Attempts 2 Start Assignment Back to Week at a Glance ( Everyone has preconceptions and biases that may escape personal awareness. Cognitive biases can lead to

Psychology Week 6 Assignment

Select a critical incident (Palisades Fire) that has occurred within the last year that you can use to respond to the questions.  Review crisis intervention theories and the categories of crisis. Consider why some individuals may be more resilient when experiencing a crisis than others. Answer the following questions: “Can

assessment

Literature Review Revision – Rubric Summary of existing literature 72 points Criteria Description Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study. Minimum of 1250 words. Peer-reviewed sources were cited. 5. Target 72 points Summary of existing literature pertaining to the topic of the proposed study is

home work

please no Ai. follow the instructions Due Jul 9 75 points View Split Screen All Search entries or author… Newest First Back to Week at a Glance ( For this Discussion, you examine why some individuals are aggressive toward others and how social psychologists might explain various types of aggressive

7.5

Part 1: In your view can coercive treatment be effective? Why or why not? Discuss its pros and cons. Post your answers and respond to 2 other classmates’ postings. Student 1 response: Yes, I think coercive treatment can work in some situations, especially when someone is a danger to themselves

Family and Marriage Therapy

I need assistance with a reflection · Weekly “Reflection” Papers – The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on the material in the readings by sharing your interpretation of a primary topic. You may relate it to a case that you have either worked with or a family experience

Family and Marriage Therapy

I need assistance with a discussion question In today’s society, there is an incredibly complex combination of cultural/ethnic influences for our families. Traditionally, we used to think about multiculturalism as it affects a blended family unit from different cultural or ethnic backgrounds. While this is still an important part of

Family and Marriage Therapy

I need assistance with some research · Final Research Paper- This assignment should be 8-10 double spaced pages, APA style. You will need to utilize 3 scholarly sources. You may select the MFT theory of your choice to expand on. Discussion will need to include theoretical core ideas, assessment tools,

Week 7

Week 7. Discussion. Systems Theory In 1968, biologist Ludwig von Bertalanffy developed General Systems Theory (GST). Simply put, GST suggests that complex issues are best understood by examining how interdependences and interrelationships among their component parts account for the whole. Prior to the development of systems theory, professionals from many