please follow up with the instructions and no AI
Due Aug 3 by 10:59pm
Points 90
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0
Allowed Attempts 2
Start Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance
(
When you meet someone new, your brain processes various sources of information including the
context in which you meet them, who they are associated with, and how they present themselves.
This processing of social information is called social cognition.
In this Assignment, you consider two people you have encountered and examine how you formed
your impressions of them.
SOCIAL COGNITION
(
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)
RESOURCES
Submit a 300- to 500-word paper, in which you:
Select one person in each category below:
A person you do not know and whom you probably will not see again (e.g., a cashier at
the grocery store)
A person you have known for some time and for whom you can remember your first
impressions (e.g., a coworker or boss, friend, partner). Do not select someone you have
known since your birth or since their birth.
Briefly describe the context of your first interaction with each person.
Based on your reading of 5.1 Key Takeaways in Jhangiani and Tarry (2022)
( , explain how
Readings
Jhangiani, R. & Tarry, H. (2022). Principles of social psychology (1st international H5P
ed.). BCcampus.
Chapter 5.1, “Initial Impression Formation”
(
Read the section titled: “Key Takeaways” only.
Time Estimate: 1 min
Copyright © 2022 by Dr. Rajiv Jhangiani and Dr. Hammond Tarry is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License,
except where otherwise noted.Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted., except where otherwise noted.
Spielman, R. M., Jenkins, W. J., & Lovett, M. D. (2020), Psychology 2e. Openstax.
Chapter 12.1, “What is Social Psychology?”
(
Time Estimate: 13 min
Copyright © 2020 by OpenStax is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution
License v4.0
Reynolds, A. (2021, February 7). Social psychology: Chapter 3 (Social cognition)
Part 1 (
v=qSOdesMyqkUv=qSOdesMyqkU) [Video]. YouTube.
v=qSOdesMyqkU
v=qSOdesMyqkU
Time Estimate: 14 min
BY DAY 7
PSYC_2005_Week4_Assignment_Rubric
you used nonverbal behaviors to form initial perceptions of each person.
Based on your reading of Spielman et al. (2020) (
2e/pages/12-1-what-is-social-psychology) , explain how you made internal and/or external
attributions for each person’s behavior. Provide details and explain the implications of
making those internal and/or external attributions.
Based on the Reynolds (2021) video (v=qSOdesMyqkU)
about social cognition, explain how you engaged in automatic thinking or controlled thinking
when forming your first impression of each person. Describe what it means to engage in
that type of thinking and why you engaged in that type of thinking.
To demonstrate what you learned this week, be sure to support your work with information
from the Learning Resources.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for originality. To check your
draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment.
1. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
2. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Criteria Ratings Pts
Description of
context of first
interaction
with each
person and
explanation of
how
nonverbal
behaviors
were used to
form initial
perceptions of
each person.
20 pts
Explanation of
internal
and/or
external
attributions
made for
each person’s
behavior,
including
details and
explanation of
implications of
making those
internal
and/or
external
attributions.
25 pts
Explanation of
engagement
in automatic
thinking or
controlled
thinking when
25 pts
20 to >17.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.
17 to >13.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
This component is
addressed. Further
development would
strengthen this
component.
13 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.
25 to >21.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.
21 to >17.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
This component is
addressed. Further
development would
strengthen this
component.
17 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.
25 to >21.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.
21 to >17.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
This component is
addressed. Further
development would
17 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.
Criteria Ratings Pts
forming first
impressions
of each
person,
description of
what it means
to engage in
that type of
thinking, and
why student
engaged in
that type of
thinking
Format and
writing
10 pts
Timeliness 10 pts
strengthen this
component.
10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
Any spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
deviations from Standard
Academic English are
minor and do not affect
clear communication.
Work includes more than
one explicit mention of
concepts or ideas from the
required sources, and an
effort to cite the original
source was made if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
The submission contains
few spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
deviations from Standard
Academic English, OR
these deviations do not
affect clear
communication. Work
includes at least one
explicit mention of a
concept or idea from the
required sources if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions and a clear
attempt at citing the source
has been made.
6 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
Multiple spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
deviations from Standard
Academic English affect
clear communication.
Work does not include any
explicit mention of
concepts or ideas from the
required sources, OR it
contains one or more
explicit mentions of a
concept or idea from the
required sources, if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions, but without
attempting to cite the
source.
10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
The assignment is
submitted according to
posted due dates and
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
The assignment is
submitted within the
allowed time.
6 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
The assignment is not
submitted on time.
Criteria Ratings Pts
Total Points: 90
times or late with prior
consent from the
instructor.
