please follow instructions and do a good job. No AI
Due Aug 10 by 10:59pm
Points 90
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0
Allowed Attempts 2
Start Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance
(
Love and attraction have been enduring topics of interest and conversation. Much of our media,
literature, and entertainment deal with topics of love and attraction; however, these popular sources
may or may not have any basis in reality. Social psychology, on the other hand, examines love and
attraction from a theoretical and scientific basis. Attraction and relationships are complex and
influenced by numerous factors, including but not limited to age, gender, stage of the relationship,
social norms, expectations, and culture.
For this Assignment, you examine a personal romantic or platonic relationship according to the
social psychology concepts you have explored this week. You also have the opportunity to apply
previous concepts you learned about in this course by considering how prosocial behavior might be
reflected in this relationship.
RELATIONSHIP ANALYSIS
(
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/Canvas/Classroom/graphics/Assignment.png)
RESOURCES
Submit a 300- to 500-word paper, in which you:
Resources
CrashCourse. (2014, June 16). Monkeys and morality: Crash course psychology
#19 (
v=YcQg1EshfIE&list=PL8dPuuaLjXtOPRKzVLY0jJY-uHOH9KVU6&index=21) [Video].
YouTube.
v=YcQg1EshfIE&list=PL8dPuuaLjXtOPRKzVLY0jJY-uHOH9KVU6&index=21
Note: Please only review the first seven minutes of this video.
Time Estimate: 7 min
Jhangiani, R. & Tarry, H. (2022). Principles of social psychology (1st international
H5P ed.). BCcampus.
Chapter 7, “Liking and Loving”
(part/liking-and-loving/)
Time Estimate: 6 min
Chapter 7.1, “Close Relationships: Liking and Loving Over the Long Term”
(chapter/initial-attraction/)
Time Estimate: 40 min
Chapter 7.3, “Thinking Like a Social Psychologist About Liking and Loving
(chapter/thinking-like-a-social-
psychologist-about-liking-and-loving/)
Time Estimate: 2 min
Chapter 7.4, “Chapter Summary”
(chapter/chapter-summary-7/)
Time Estimate: 4 min
Note: Read All of Chapter 7 except for section 7.2.
Copyright © 2022 by Dr. Rajiv Jhangiani and Dr. Hammond Tarry is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License,
except where otherwise noted.
BY DAY 7
PSYC_2005_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
Select a friendship or romantic relationship you have or have had as an adult (or a
friendship or romantic relationship that someone you know personally has or has had as an
adult).
Briefly describe the relationship, including who the two individuals are, the type of
relationship, and its length. You may use pseudonyms.
Describe and provide behavioral evidence of each person’s adult attachment style in this
relationship and each person’s likely childhood attachment style.
Based on the CrashCourse (2014) video (
v=YcQg1EshfIE&list=PL8dPuuaLjXtOPRKzVLY0jJY-uHOH9KVU6&index=21) , identify and
describe behavioral evidence of each person’s adult attachment style in this relationship
and each person’s likely childhood attachment style.
Based on Jhangiani and Tarry (2022), Chapter 7
(part/liking-and-loving/) , 7.1
(chapter/initial-attraction/) , 7.3
(chapter/thinking-like-a-social-psychologist-about-
liking-and-loving/) , and 7.4 (chapter/chapter-
summary-7/) , select two additional concepts or theories from the course readings, other
than attachment, to describe the relationship in more depth. Specifically, how do these
concepts or theories explain how this relationship developed, was maintained, or
ended?
To demonstrate what you learned this week, be sure to support your work with information from
the Learning Resources.
Be sure to review the Week 5 Assignment Rubric to understand the specific grading criteria
your Instructor will use to evaluate your work.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for originality. To check your
draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment.
1. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
2. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Criteria Ratings Pts
Brief
description of
relationship,
including who
the two
individuals
are, the type
of
relationship,
and its length;
and
identification
and
behavioral
evidence of
each person’s
adult
attachment
style in this
relationship
and each
person’s likely
childhood
attachment
style
35 pts
Description of
how two
additional
concepts or
theories, other
than
attachment,
can be used
to explain
relationship in
more depth;
specifically,
35 pts
35 to >30.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.
30 to >24.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
This component is
addressed. Further
development would
strengthen this
component.
24 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.
35 to >30.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.
30 to >24.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
This component is
addressed. Further
development would
strengthen this
component.
24 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.
Criteria Ratings Pts
how this
relationship
developed,
was
maintained, or
ended.
Format and
writing
10 pts
Timeliness
10 pts
Total Points: 90
10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
Any spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
deviations from Standard
Academic English are
minor and do not affect
clear communication.
Work includes more than
one explicit mention of
concepts or ideas from the
required sources, and an
effort to cite the original
source was made if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
The submission contains
few spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
deviations from Standard
Academic English, OR
these deviations do not
affect clear
communication. Work
includes at least one
explicit mention of a
concept or idea from the
required sources if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions and a clear
attempt at citing the
source has been made.
6 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
Multiple spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
deviations from Standard
Academic English affect
clear communication.
Work does not include any
explicit mention of
concepts or ideas from the
required sources, OR it
contains one or more
explicit mentions of a
concept or idea from the
required sources, if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions, but without
attempting to cite the
source.
10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
The assignment is
submitted according to
posted due dates and
times or late with prior
consent from the
instructor.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient (Meets
expectations)
The assignment is
submitted within the
allowed time.
6 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
The assignment is not
submitted on time.
