Please follow instructions, No AI Or ChatGPT’s. Please do a good job. Let me what is needed.
Due Sunday by 10:59pm
Points 90
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0
Allowed Attempts 2
Start Assignment
Back to Week at a Glance
(
REVIEWING CODES OF ETHICS
An ethical code is only as good as its application by practitioners. There are variations among different
organizations’ codes, but they often have a great deal in common. Understanding the ethical practice of
public relations and developing clear ways to think about ethics are both essential to success.
Review the code of ethics from the PRSA and from one other public institution provided in the learning
resources. Submit a 2–3-page paper that addresses the following points:
Briefly compare the two codes, highlighting the differences between them.
Describe a situation that might violate one code but not the other.
If there are provisions of either code that you believe should be revised or strengthened, identify
them and explain your rationale and suggestion.
If you don’t believe either code could be improved upon, explain why not.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
(
BY DAY 7
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
PREL_3001_Week1_Assignment_Rubric
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
WK1Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Criteria Ratings Pts
The
assignment
compares and
contrasts two
institution’s
codes of
ethics.
25 pts
The
assignment
provides an
example of a
situation
where one
code was
violated but
not the other.
25 pts
The
assignment
provides
suggestions
for
improvement
of the codes
or an
explanation
as to why
neither code
needs
improvement.
20 pts
Format and
Writing
10 pts
25 to >21.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.
21 to >17.0 pts
Proficient Criteria
This component is
addressed. Further
development would
strengthen this
component.
17 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.
25 to >21.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.
21 to >17.0 pts
Proficient Criteria
This component is
addressed. Further
development would
strengthen this
component.
17 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.
20 to >18.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
This component is fully
addressed and logically
presented.
18 to >13.0 pts
Proficient Criteria
This component is
addressed. Further
development would
strengthen this
component.
13 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
This component is not
present or not clearly
addressed.
10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
Any spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
deviations from Standard
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient Criteria
Submission contains few
spelling, grammar, and/or
punctuation deviations
from Standard Academic
6 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
Submission contains
multiple spelling, grammar,
and/or punctuation
Criteria Ratings Pts
Timeliness
10 pts
Total Points: 90
Academic English are
minor and do not affect
clear communication.
Communication
demonstrates discipline-
specific conventions, such
as stylistic choices
appropriate to an
academic audience. Work
includes multiple explicit
mentions of concepts or
ideas from the required
sources correctly cited and
formatted if specified by
the
assignment/discussion. A
reference page is included
and properly formatted.
English, OR these
deviations do not affect
clear communication.
Work includes one or more
explicit mentions of a
concept or idea from the
required sources if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions, and an attempt
at citing the source has
been made. A reference
page is included.
deviations from Standard
Academic English,
affecting clear
communication. Work
does not include any
explicit mention of
concepts or ideas from the
required sources, OR it
contains one or more
explicit mention of a
concept or idea from the
required sources, if
specified by the
assignment/discussion’s
directions, but without any
attempt at citing the
source. A reference page
is not included.
10 to >8.0 pts
Exemplary (Exceeds
expectations)
The assignment is
submitted according to
posted due dates and
times or late with prior
consent from the
instructor.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient Criteria
The assignment is
submitted within the
allowed time.
6 to >0 pts
Developing (Does not
fully meet expectations)
The assignment is not
submitted on time.