Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Psychology Unit 7 Assignment/Final Project: Literature Review

PSY341 – Research Methods in the
Social Sciences

Unit 7 Final Assignment: The Literature Review

Due Date:
Points: 100

Overview:

For this assignment, you will write a literature review based on your approved topic from Unit 2.
You should incorporate into your literature review information from the peer-reviewed journal
articles you found in Units 3, 4, 5, and 6.

Instructions:

This includes:

• a summary of the findings from each peer-reviewed article,

• a conclusion about what is known on your topic based on the totality of this information,

• a discussion of the practical real-world implications and applications of this knowledge,

• discussion of gaps in the literature on your topic. These gaps should lead to one rational
null and one alternative hypothesis, which you should state at the end of your literature
review.

Requirements:

• Your literature review should be at least five (5) pages, double-spaced, not including a
title and references page.

• Your paper should be typed in a Word file and using size 12 Times New Roman font.

• You should cite and reference the four (4) peer-reviewed journal articles you found in
Units 3, 4, 5, and 6 in APA format.

Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before
you write and again after you write.

PSY341–Research Methods in theSocial Sciences

Evaluation Rubric for Literature Review Assignment

CRITERIA Deficient Needs

Improvement
Proficient Exemplary

0 points 1-5 points 6-9 points 10 points
Number of
Scholarly
Sources

Sources do not
meet scholarly
criteria.

The required
number of sources
is included, but
less than four of
these sources are
peer-reviewed
journal scholarly
articles.

The required
number of peer-
reviewed scholarly
research articles is
met (4).

The required
number of peer-
reviewed scholarly
research articles is
met (4) or
exceeded.

0 points 1 point 2-4 points 5 points
Relevance of
Sources to
Literature
Review Topic

None of the
articles are
relevant to
literature review
topic.

Only 1 article is
relevant to
literature review
topic.

Only 2-3 articles
are relevant to
literature review
topic.

All 4 articles are
highly relevant to
literature review
topic.

0 – 8 points 9 – 11 points 12 – 14 points 15 points
Sources
Summarized

Content in each
source is
discussed but it
significantly lacks
thematic focus and
detail.

Content in each
source is
discussed in some
detail. Some
attempt is made to
organize the
discussion
thematically.

Content in each
scholarly source is
discussed.
Discussion is
organized
thematically with
sufficient detail.

Content in each
scholarly source is
discussed in detail.
Discussion is well-
organized.

0 – 8 points 9 – 11 points 12 – 14 points 15 points
Conclusions
Regarding
Current State
of Knowledge
of the
Literature
Review Topic

A conclusion
about what is
currently known
about the literature
review topic is
either not provided
or a conclusion is
given but there is
no attempt to
synthesize the
information from
each scholarly
source.

A conclusion
about what is
known about the
literature review
topic is provided.
Conclusion is
somewhat
detailed.

A conclusion about
what is currently
known about the
literature review
topic is provided.
Conclusion
contains sufficient
detail.

A conclusion about
what is currently
known about the
literature review
topic is provided.
Information
obtained from each
article is
synthesized into a
well elaborated
conclusion.

0 – 8 points 9 – 11 points 12 – 14 points 15 points
Real-world
Implications
and
Application of
Source
Content

The real-world
implications and
applications of the
information in
some sources are
discussed or are

The real-world
implications and
application of the
information in
each scholarly
source is

The real-world
implications and
applications of the
information in each
scholarly source is

The real-world
implications of the
information in each
scholarly source is
discussed in detail.

CRITERIA Deficient Needs
Improvement

Proficient Exemplary

not discussed at
all.

discussed in some
detail.

discussed in
sufficient detail.

0 points 1-5 points 6-9 points 10 points
Gaps in the
Literature

Gaps in the
literature are not
identified.

Gaps in the
literature are not
sufficiently
identified or do not
lead to rationale
hypotheses.

Gaps in the
literature are
sufficiently
identified and it is
somewhat clear
how these gaps
have led to
hypotheses.

Gaps in the
literature are
identified and lead
to rationale
hypotheses.

0 points 1-5 points 6-9 points 10 points
Hypotheses
and Variables,
and
Operationaliza
tion

Unclear null and
alternative
hypotheses that
lack appropriate
independent and
dependent
variables.

Unclear null and
alternative
hypothesis that
are missing an
independent or
dependent
variable. Variables
are vague and not
well
operationalized.

Clearly written null
and alternative
hypotheses with
both independent
and dependent
variables, but
variables are not
sufficiently
operationalized.

Clearly written,
insightful null and
alternative
hypotheses and
independent and
dependent
variables are
correctly
operationalized.

0 – 9 points 10 – 15 points 16 – 19 points 20 points
Clear and
Professional
Writing and
APA Format

Errors impede
professional
presentation;
guidelines not
followed.

Significant
errors that do not
impede
professional
presentation.

Few errors that do
not impede
professional
presentation.

Writing and format
are clear,
professional, APA
compliant, and
error free.

  • Overview:
  • Instructions:
  • Requirements:
  • Evaluation Rubric for Literature Review Assignment

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

feed back lien

  Nice work presenting the four scales of measurement. Why is it that despite ratio scale being at the highest level of information, is not commonly achieved in research? According to Kline et al. (2005), research aims for interval scale but achieves ordinal level. If I am interested in measuring

Discussion Board

 There are both supporters of and critics of managed care, and the research has been mixed. Discuss at least two pros and cons of managed care. 

discussion board

 Contact a child welfare social worker and interview them about their experiences in their field of practice.  Include these areas in your interview: cultural factors in assessment; legal and policy implications and challenges in practice; and ethical considerations in practice.  Your initial posting should summarize the key points from your

6070-4d

  Post a potential solution to the ethical scenario that draws on ethical leadership and the NASW Code of Ethics. Provide justification for your choices using a specific NASW ethical standard. Additionally, explain the type of power you would utilize in achieving the solution.  (scenario) You have been told that the

Detailed

See attachment Assignment Questions: “What do individuals need to do to be prepared economically for their older years?” · Identify the age that you are starting from and how long this individual will be able to plan for retirement, etc. · Be specific in your responses. Utilize information available on-line,

psych 421

Chapter 5 – Artificially Modeling the mind (200 words) Hello; for this week, please, read chapter 5 and answer the following questions: 1. How do artificial neural network models work alongside neuroscientific techniques to help us study the brain? What do they add to our understanding? 2. Why do you think

feed back prof

 his is a good start but there are some areas that need more detail. I’m going to focus on self-esteem. You mention how others define self-esteem but I’d like you to discuss difficulties in defining self-esteem. Also, how would you define self-esteem after looking at Rosenberg’s scale and others? Do

Discussion

· Discussion 1 · · · Should Russ Saffold intervene to help his team handle this crisis? If so, what type of leadership action should he take, and why? · What leadership actions, if any, should team members take? · What should Russ Saffold do, if anything, to mitigate the

Psychology Can someone help me with my critical thinking homework?

Open Quick Links Quick Links Page Landmarks Content Outline Keyboard Shortcuts Current Location SP25MI Critical Thinking (PHI-300-B) Course Content Week 9 – Conflict Resolution Menu Management Options Course Menu: SP25MI Critical Thinking (PHI-300-B) Getting Started Home Start Here Course Information My Course Annoucements Course Content My Grades Email Collaborate Technical

Psychology Can someone help me with my critical thinking homework?

Open Quick Links Quick Links Page Landmarks Content Outline Keyboard Shortcuts Current Location SP25MI Critical Thinking (PHI-300-B) Course Content Week 9 – Conflict Resolution Menu Management Options Course Menu: SP25MI Critical Thinking (PHI-300-B) Getting Started Home Start Here Course Information My Course Annoucements Course Content My Grades Email Collaborate Technical

world cultures

see attachment  Introduction After the death of Alexander in 323 B.C.E, his empire was divided among his generals. For the next few hundred years the Greek culture settled in the customs of the people it had invaded through Alexander. However, while this was happening the Roman people were starting to

world cultures

see attachment  I nstructions: 1. Look up the consequences of Julius Caesar’s assassination. 2. Come up with a scenario in which Caesar wouldn’t have been assassinated. 3. Think three possibilities of your own and explain why you think those. 4. Submit your assignment in Word and in the space provided

english

see attachment  CRAAP Test: Is Your Source Worthy of Inclusion in Your Essay Research? If you want to succeed at your assignments or research, you should only use quality information. Use the following criteria, also known as the  CRAAP Test, to evaluate any information source critically. Video: Evaluating SourcesLinks to

english

see attachment  CRAAP Test: Is Your Source Worthy of Inclusion in Your Essay Research? If you want to succeed at your assignments or research, you should only use quality information. Use the following criteria, also known as the  CRAAP Test, to evaluate any information source critically. Video: Evaluating SourcesLinks to

english

see attachment  Discussion Etiquette Guidelines: 1. Think and edit before you post. 2. DON’T SHOUT: TYPING IN ALL CAPS IS AGGRESSIVE.  3. Participate, but don’t dominate. 4. Cite your sources. · Imagine sending as a text message one of these guidelines to the main character in a movie who reacted

Psychology

EAB4764 Assessment and Intervention Lecture Engagement: Written Lecture Summary Student Name: Date Completed: Student ID: (41) zoom 0 – YouTube On minute 21:22. After watching the video students must complete. Please answer the questions below in a narrative form. Each answer should be a complete paragraph. 1. What was the main

Psychology

I need help with formatting a disorder fact sheet.  Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title Neurodiversity Fact Sheet (Include name of the diagnosis in title.) Description of neurodiverse condition: The impact on individuals with the condition: Technique 1 for enhancing learning for (Name the condition and remove this

Discussion Board

 There are both supporters of and critics of managed care, and the research has been mixed. Discuss at least two pros and cons of managed care.