Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Q1 R1

Post 1 Response 1

100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation

Due 1/31/2025

William

The admissibility of polygraph evidence in legal proceedings is complex, influenced by legal standards and scientific critique. In the United States, polygraph results are not universally accepted due to questions about their reliability and potential for prejudice. The decision often hinges on the presiding judge’s discretion, who must weigh the evidence’s probative value against its potential to mislead or confuse the jury. The Daubert standard, established by the Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., requires scientific evidence to be relevant and reliable, considering factors like testability, peer review, error rates, and general acceptance in the scientific community. Polygraph evidence frequently struggles to meet these criteria due to ongoing debate about its scientific validity. In some instances, polygraph results may be admitted under specific conditions agreed upon by both parties involved in a case. For example, in certain jurisdictions, polygraph evidence can be considered if both the prosecution and defense consent to its use before the test is administered. Even with such agreements, courts remain cautious, often instructing juries to consider the evidence with skepticism due to its controversial nature. The federal landscape concerning polygraph tests is marked by a cautious approach to their admissibility in court. Federal courts typically adhere to stringent standards for scientific evidence, guided by the Federal Rules of Evidence. Rule 702 emphasizes the necessity for expert testimony to be grounded in reliable principles and methods, a criterion that polygraph evidence often struggles to fulfill due to its contentious scientific foundations. The landmark case of United States v. Scheffer underscored the judiciary’s reluctance to accept polygraph evidence. The Supreme Court upheld a military rule that excluded polygraph results, citing their questionable reliability and potential to undermine the jury’s role in determining credibility. This decision reflects a broader federal hesitance to embrace polygraph tests without clear validation of their accuracy. Federal agencies occasionally utilize polygraphs outside the courtroom, particularly in employment screenings for sensitive positions. Agencies like the FBI and CIA may deploy polygraph examinations as part of their security protocols, although these results are not typically disclosed or used as direct evidence in legal proceedings. This duality highlights a nuanced federal stance, where polygraphs serve as tools for internal assessments rather than courtroom evidence. The admissibility of polygraph evidence varies significantly across states, reflecting a patchwork of legal standards and judicial interpretations. Some states, such as California, have taken a firm stance against admitting polygraph results, citing their dubious reliability and potential to mislead juries. This exclusion is often rooted in state-specific evidentiary rules that prioritize objective and scientifically validated methods. Conversely, states like New Mexico have adopted a more permissive approach, allowing polygraph results to be introduced as evidence, provided they meet specific standards of reliability and relevance. In these states, admissibility often hinges on the examiner’s qualifications and the test’s adherence to established protocols, which aim to enhance the overall credibility of the results. In states where polygraph evidence is conditionally accepted, its admission is often contingent upon a pre-trial hearing where the judge evaluates its potential impact on the proceedings. These hearings serve as a gatekeeping mechanism, ensuring that only evidence with substantial probative value is presented to the jury. Despite these variations, a common thread among states is the cautious treatment of polygraph evidence, reflecting broader concerns about its scientific underpinnings. The criteria for admitting polygraph evidence are influenced by varying legal standards that aim to ensure only reliable and relevant evidence is considered in judicial proceedings. The Frye test, originating from Frye v. United States, requires that scientific evidence be “generally accepted” by a significant portion of the relevant scientific community. This standard place a substantial burden on proponents of polygraph evidence, as the scientific community remains divided on its reliability. In courts applying the Daubert standard, judges act as gatekeepers, assessing the scientific validity of polygraph evidence through a multi-factor analysis. This includes examining whether the polygraph technique has been subjected to peer review, whether there are known rates of error, and whether the principles have been generally accepted by experts. The subjective nature of polygraph analysis often complicates its ability to meet these criteria, creating a challenging landscape for its proponents.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

question, week 2 dp

Under what circumstances do officers act “under the color of law,” and why is it important to understand this? Will community policing increase or decrease the number of civil liability claims? Policing in minority communities is often challenging. Please explain why and what can be done to establish confidence in

week 3

Week 3 – Can you identify at least two obstacles to the initial crime analysis movement and how these obstacles impeded the evolution and advancement of crime analysis to date? Identification, prevention, and the proactive reduction of community crime are contingent upon access to timely accurate information. Data driven management

DB Response

Please see attached.  CJUS 350 Discussion Assignment Instructions The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post at least 2 replies of at

Module One Practice Activity- CJ 305 Technology in Criminal Justice

Please see attachment below for assignment details. Module One Practice Activity Guidelines and Rubric.html CJ 305 Module One Practice Activity Guidelines and Rubric Overview In this assignment, you will explore technological tools and police goals. You will examine the different ways to classify law enforcement technology and the police goals

Topic

See attached Topic Assignment for instructions Assignment Topic: Egoism Each ethical system uniquely defines morality according to its own philosophies. Argue why the ethical framework of “Egoism” should be considered the premier ethical system, Egoisms significance in the world, and how egoism explains socially beneficial and criminal or socially destructive

Disc.One

Please see instructions in Assistance One attachment Use the articles attached to answer the questions below thoroughly. Each question must be one paragraph with APA citation: 1. Regarding the reports depicted in the Campbell journal article, answer the following questions: · Question 1: Were the reports written objectively, fairly, and

WK3 DB

Please see attached.  CJUS 350 Discussion Assignment Instructions The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post at least 2 replies of at

Criminal Justice

250 words 1. (Restorative Justice): What advantage would society gain if restorative justice were the only method of punishment? In your answer, consider all the advantages and disadvantages offered by a restorative justice approach to punishment. 250 words 2. (Damages): In 1997, a jury awarded a $25 million settlement of

Week 6

Please read attachments for details Literature Review Assignment – Week 6 Instructions The literature review focuses on how other researchers have addressed similar questions. It places the study in context and discusses how it will differentiate itself from what is already in the field. You are attempting to establish what

Posc D5

The CQ Researcher reading and course resources for this week provide important information on this issue. Describe government surveillance programs that have developed since 9/11. Do you think these programs violate citizens’ constitutional rights or are they necessary measures to track terrorists? Justify and explain your answer.

CJ (T)

Part A Discussion Board #1 Bureau of Justice Statistics Exercise Instructions: You will use the  Bureau of Justice Crime Statistics toolLinks to an external site. to help you recognize trends in crime data of areas of interest. For this assignment, you will complete two tasks:   1. Examine your current state 

i need help crj 435 wk6

  In this activity, you’ll read a scenario involving a potential gang recruit and a long-time gang member, followed by a text message conversation between the two. In this conversation, you’ll witness the subtle ways gangs recruit new members and lure in those who are vulnerable. Afterward, you’ll have the

discussion

    As a lawyer what questions would you ask potential jurors to ensure competency? 

DB Response WK2

See Attached. CJUS 350 Discussion Assignment Instructions The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post at least 2 replies of at least

d

Week 2 – What are your questions about how and why crime distributes disproportionately across space and time. What factors might contribute to these distributions? There is a large knowledge base out there that discusses the temporal and spatial distribution of crime. This literature base also explores the myriad of

serial killers

Criminal Minds: Serial Killers · Due Saturday by 11:59pm   · Points 100   · Submitting a file upload   · Available Aug 24 at 12am – Aug 30 at 11:59pm The term ‘serial killings’ means a series of three or more killings , not less than one of which was committed within the United States,

Criminal Justice

Article review must be: 1. At least two pages not including reference page. 2. Very clear and understandable summary 3. All scholarly (peer reviewed articles or law reviews) that clearly support or refutes the conclusion. APA 4. Must have two-three references

Week 8 Discussion – VPN Management Techniques

VPNs are available both commercially and as open source. Research the VPN solution of two IT solutions vendors. Be prepared to discuss both types. Discuss which solution you would recommend for a small business, and why. Explain each of the following VPN implementations: DMZ-based, bypass deployment, and internally connected deployment.