Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Q1 R1

Post 1 Response 1

100-word response/ 1 reference/intext citation

Due 1/31/2025

William

The admissibility of polygraph evidence in legal proceedings is complex, influenced by legal standards and scientific critique. In the United States, polygraph results are not universally accepted due to questions about their reliability and potential for prejudice. The decision often hinges on the presiding judge’s discretion, who must weigh the evidence’s probative value against its potential to mislead or confuse the jury. The Daubert standard, established by the Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., requires scientific evidence to be relevant and reliable, considering factors like testability, peer review, error rates, and general acceptance in the scientific community. Polygraph evidence frequently struggles to meet these criteria due to ongoing debate about its scientific validity. In some instances, polygraph results may be admitted under specific conditions agreed upon by both parties involved in a case. For example, in certain jurisdictions, polygraph evidence can be considered if both the prosecution and defense consent to its use before the test is administered. Even with such agreements, courts remain cautious, often instructing juries to consider the evidence with skepticism due to its controversial nature. The federal landscape concerning polygraph tests is marked by a cautious approach to their admissibility in court. Federal courts typically adhere to stringent standards for scientific evidence, guided by the Federal Rules of Evidence. Rule 702 emphasizes the necessity for expert testimony to be grounded in reliable principles and methods, a criterion that polygraph evidence often struggles to fulfill due to its contentious scientific foundations. The landmark case of United States v. Scheffer underscored the judiciary’s reluctance to accept polygraph evidence. The Supreme Court upheld a military rule that excluded polygraph results, citing their questionable reliability and potential to undermine the jury’s role in determining credibility. This decision reflects a broader federal hesitance to embrace polygraph tests without clear validation of their accuracy. Federal agencies occasionally utilize polygraphs outside the courtroom, particularly in employment screenings for sensitive positions. Agencies like the FBI and CIA may deploy polygraph examinations as part of their security protocols, although these results are not typically disclosed or used as direct evidence in legal proceedings. This duality highlights a nuanced federal stance, where polygraphs serve as tools for internal assessments rather than courtroom evidence. The admissibility of polygraph evidence varies significantly across states, reflecting a patchwork of legal standards and judicial interpretations. Some states, such as California, have taken a firm stance against admitting polygraph results, citing their dubious reliability and potential to mislead juries. This exclusion is often rooted in state-specific evidentiary rules that prioritize objective and scientifically validated methods. Conversely, states like New Mexico have adopted a more permissive approach, allowing polygraph results to be introduced as evidence, provided they meet specific standards of reliability and relevance. In these states, admissibility often hinges on the examiner’s qualifications and the test’s adherence to established protocols, which aim to enhance the overall credibility of the results. In states where polygraph evidence is conditionally accepted, its admission is often contingent upon a pre-trial hearing where the judge evaluates its potential impact on the proceedings. These hearings serve as a gatekeeping mechanism, ensuring that only evidence with substantial probative value is presented to the jury. Despite these variations, a common thread among states is the cautious treatment of polygraph evidence, reflecting broader concerns about its scientific underpinnings. The criteria for admitting polygraph evidence are influenced by varying legal standards that aim to ensure only reliable and relevant evidence is considered in judicial proceedings. The Frye test, originating from Frye v. United States, requires that scientific evidence be “generally accepted” by a significant portion of the relevant scientific community. This standard place a substantial burden on proponents of polygraph evidence, as the scientific community remains divided on its reliability. In courts applying the Daubert standard, judges act as gatekeepers, assessing the scientific validity of polygraph evidence through a multi-factor analysis. This includes examining whether the polygraph technique has been subjected to peer review, whether there are known rates of error, and whether the principles have been generally accepted by experts. The subjective nature of polygraph analysis often complicates its ability to meet these criteria, creating a challenging landscape for its proponents.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Criminal Justice

Article review must be: 1. At least two pages not including reference page. 2. Very clear and understandable summary 3. All scholarly (peer reviewed articles or law reviews) that clearly support or refutes the conclusion. APA Must have at least 3 references.

Discussion

Relative significance of the following lab errors:  Wrong date or name on the report, but correct Agency Number and referring Officer is on the report. Explore the significance and quality of the effort. How would you improve the performance? 2. The analysis for drugs was correct, but the secretary mistyped

Criminal Justice

Discussion instructions Each discussion must be 250 words. Each discussion question must have two references. Outside references are all scholarly (peer reviewed journal article, law review) in APA format. Question 1 (Judge): You are a Judge presiding over the trial of an alleged bank robber, who you know is innocent.

WAL

INSTRUCTIONS Don’t freak out when you see the length of the assignment document! It is over 30 pages, but the reason it is so long is because all of the informa?on you will need to complete the assignment is included (including full, unedited court opinions). You will no?ce that the

III

See both attachments Instructions: Answer the 5 discussion questions corresponding to exercise 2.1, and the three application exercise questions corresponding to exercise 2.2, in the uploaded Ireland et al., pdf (Ireland et al., Chapter 2 & application exercises). Students are simply asked to offer a complete answer to each question.

D9 posc

Why have third parties never really taken off in America? Would you like to see a third party alternative to the Democrats and Republicans? If yes, what would you look for in such a party? Do you think the Democrats and Republicans will ever face a viable third party challenge?

crj 435 wk8 i need help

CRJ435 – Drugs, Gangs, and Organized Crime Week 8 Activity – Local and Global Gangs Worksheet Local and Global Gangs 1. Describe a gang operating in your area, including its name, location, and 3 facts about the gang. Note : These facts could relate to the gang’s: · History ·

crj 331 i need help wk1

CRJ331: Common Disorders in the Criminal Justice System Overview: The goal of this activity is to reinforce the facts around some of the more common disorders seen in the criminal justice system by forensic psychologists. Each disorder has a flashcard with a brief definition from the American Psychiatric Association and

Write a reflection

Write a reflection on the following uploaded material. In the reflection include a summary of the key points and answer these questions What are the key takeaways from this week’s materials? How do the materials connect to your experiences, current events, or previous course content?What aspects did you agree or

DB Response

Please see attached.  CJUS 350 Discussion Assignment Instructions The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post at least 2 replies of at

Political S

1. Educational System and Infrastructure One of the most immediate challenges African countries would face in rejecting European languages is the existing educational infrastructure. For decades, African nations have built their educational systems around European languages, and a significant portion of scholarly research, textbooks, and educational resources are in these

2-2 Journal: Juvenile Versus Adult: Integrity, Authority, and Discretionary Power

Please review the attachment below for assignment details. Module Two Journal Assignment Guidelines and Rubric.html CJ 230 Module Two Journal Assignment Guidelines and Rubric Overview In this assignment, you will explore the roles integrity, authority, and discretionary power play when addressing an adult defendant and a juvenile defendant. Prompt Now

Excel 1G Regional Sales

Sheet1 The Easy Pantry Regional Sales to Specialty Stores Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Total % of Total Sales Trend Northeast 325465.5 410758.22 452877.24 485326.27 Southeast 295784.87 301875.43 320983.47 335752.43 West 489624.81 466233.87 469987.54 522874.66 Total Sales

Criminal Justice

Article review must be: 1. At least two pages not including reference page. 2. Very clear and understandable summary 3. All scholarly (peer reviewed articles or law reviews) that clearly support or refutes the conclusion. APA Must have at least 3 references.

WK 4 DB

Please see attached. CJUS 350 Discussion Assignment Instructions The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post at least 2 replies of at

Criminal Justice

Discussion instructions Each discussion must be 250 words. Each discussion question must have two references. Outside references are all scholarly (peer reviewed journal article, law review) in APA format.

Disc 9

Is it ethical to call domestic and international terrorist enemy combatants rather than criminals?  What are some of the issues that may arise?