Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Question

Journal Assignment:

If you’re a member of the Prosecution, you will write 300 words or more for your journal,
laying out the best evidence to convict William Bradfield. If you are Defense, write 300 more
words laying out the best evidence to find him innocent. If you are on team Jury, you will do
300 words on each (600 total). Present your case as an extended argument, convincing
yourself (and your classmates) why whatever you believe is the objective truth.

Below is an optional set of instructions/prompts to help you build and organize your cases
for the journal and best practices, such as Prosecution offering discovery to the Defense.
Also attached is guides for Opening Statements and How to handle Objections. Email me if
you have any questions.

Pre-Trial Journal Prompt for the Prosecution:

1. Evidence Analysis (Pages 154-183):

o Read the relevant pages of the text and identify the following:

o What key pieces of evidence/witnesses from these pages are most crucial to
your case? List and explain why they are important to proving the defendant’s
guilt.

o Are there any potential weaknesses/counterarguments related to the
evidence that you need to address preemptively?

o Identify any connections between pieces of evidence/witnesses that could
strengthen your argument or create a narrative thread for the jury.

o You must email a copy of this called “discovery” to the defense attorneys a
week before the trial.

2. Building Your Argument:

o How will you introduce the case and engage the jury’s attention? Think about
how to establish the facts clearly and persuasively from the outset.

o What points do you intend to make to convince the jury of the defendant’s
guilt? Outline them in a logical sequence.

o Ensure each point logically leads to the next. How can you make sure your
argument is cohesive and flows naturally as you walk the jury through the
evidence.

o For example, you should establish that a crime was committed before
arguing there was a conspiracy and only after that what part the accused
played in that conspiracy.

3. Rhetorical Strategy:

o What rhetorical devices will you use to persuade the jury? Consider ethos,
pathos, and logos, and how each can strengthen your argument. Ethos
focuses on the speaker’s credibility, pathos appeals to emotions, and logos
relies on logic and reason.

o Consider how you will respond to any potential rebuttals or defenses raised
by the opposing side.

4. Required Writing:

o Write your opening statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

o Determine who will be called and what questions you’ll ask each witness.

o Write your closing statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

Pre-Trial Journal Prompt for the Defense:

1. Evidence Analysis (Pages 154-183):

o Read the relevant pages of the text and identify the following:

o What traces make good evidence in the case? What evidence/witnesses
might support your argument that the defendant is innocent, or what can you
use to cast doubt on the prosecution’s case?

o Receive and read the prosecution’s discovery. Review the prosecution’s case
as detailed in their discovery. Are there any pieces of evidence you can
discredit or reinterpret? How will you challenge the reliability or credibility of
the evidence presented?

o What inconsistencies or gaps in the evidence can you highlight to weaken the
prosecution’s argument?

2. Building Your Argument:

o How will you open your defense to the jury? Think about how to introduce the
idea that reasonable doubt exists.

o What are the primary points you need to make to show the defendant’s
innocence or cast doubt on their guilt? Structure these points logically.

o How will you ensure your argument flows clearly, with each point supporting
the next and culminating in a strong conclusion?

3. Rhetorical Strategy:

o How will you use rhetoric to create empathy for the defendant and engage
the jury emotionally? What tone will you adopt to convey sincerity and
credibility?

o How can you use ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade the jury of your
argument’s merit? Ethos focuses on the speaker’s credibility, pathos appeals
to emotions, and logos relies on logic and reason.

o What preemptive counterarguments can you anticipate from the
prosecution, and how will you respond to them?

4. Required Writing:

o Write your opening statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

o Determine who will be called and what questions you’ll ask each witness.

o Write your closing statement, you’ll read this aloud at the Mock Trial.

Yuzu Reader: Critical Thinking: Consider the Verdict

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Lorem, Ipsum

JBI Appraisal Tool Utilization For each article you are required to utilize the appropriate JBI Critical Appraisal Tool. After you have determined which of the Tools is appropriate for the article, you will download the Word file of the Tool and fill it out. Once you have completed the 4

NUR 630

Reply from Leeann Chang Module 7 Discussion Minors discovering their gender identity is an immense provision towards psychological health, self-awareness and emotional level being stabilized. The Adolescence stage is a crucial one in the identity-making stage of development. The deprivation of the rights of minors to explore their gender can

springfield, Oasha

  Module 09 Lippincott Advisor for Education: Problem Based Care Plan Lippincott Advisor for Education: Problem Based Care Plan Lippincott Advisor for Education: Problem Based Care Plan Generator is located in the CoursePoint Dashboard folder. Develop a care plan for one of the following patient concerns (see grading rubric below):

learners assesment

Learner’s Need Assignment [Student Name] [Course Number]: [Course Name] [Professor’s Name] West Coast University Los Angeles Campus [Due Date] Learners Needs Assignment Learning Style Assessment [What does the client (patient/family) say about their learning style?] Teaching Approach [How will you teach a client with this learning style?] Readiness Evaluation [How

NUR 514 discussion #7

Module 7 Discussion   Female Patient Cases 5 For this Discussion, your instructor will assign you three case  numbers. Case 4  Cases The Diagnosis criteria for Pre-eclampsia based on the ACOG guidelines and the maternal and fetal complications related. Questions for the case · Discuss the Diagnosis criteria for Pre-eclampsia based

IV

Instructions Read the scenario below and respond using clear, concise clinical reasoning. Your response must be a paragraph long. This assignment assesses your foundational knowledge of IV insertion, complication recognition, and appropriate nursing interventions. Scenario You begin your shift and take over care for a patient receiving IV fluids at

Unit V DB Health

see attached DB V •  Your initial post should be at least 200 words in length. Post 3: Response post to a second classmate or the instructor’s follow-up question is due by the end of day on Tuesday. You recently helped your patient review a denied insurance claim for a routine

Biostadistic

Data Set Code – InDist 1 7532 1 7532 1 7532 1 5380 1 7532 1 5300 1 4193 1 9534 1 5152 1 4354 1 5652 1 6335 1 5792 1 5792 1 5792 1 5674 1 5792 1 5718 1 5652 1 5268 1 5306 1 4193 1

Biostadistic

 Module 7: Assignment 1 Using the below dataset calculate in Excel; R and p-value to determine the power of association and if your calculations are statistically significant. V1 (Input Y Range) (Dependent Variable) V2 (Input X Range) (Independent Variable) 12 45 15 54 17 61 13 51 18 70 20 73

Biostadistic

Module 7: Assignment 2 The Mann-Whitney U Test is a nonparametric version of the independent samples t-test. The test primarily deals with two independent samples that contain ordinal data. The following example explained the comparison between the nonparametric versus parametric tests. 1. Select the best choice for the analysis and explain

Biostadistic

Module 6: Assignment 2 In a prior example we evaluated data from a survey of university graduates which assessed, among other things, how frequently they exercised. The survey was completed by 470 graduates. In the prior example we used the χ goodness-of-fit test to assess whether there was a shift in

Help with reseach

See attachment before bid.  Assignment 7 Final This week you will complete and submit your final paper. Include the table of content (outline) and abstract you wrote last week and the complete reference list in your final submission.  As a reminder, in your final paper, be sure to also include:

nurse interview

Am a nursing student and i attended my leadership clinicals at mercy hospital. on day one, i followed my preceptor for 12hours from 6am to 6pm on all of the 7 clinical day rotation she is an RN BSN nurse and the i was doing a leadership in nursing clinicals

home work

Competency This deliverable will allow you to apply deductive and inductive reasoning to analyze and create valid arguments. Instructions Part I: Consider the following definition: 1. A  fruit is the product of a tree or other plant that contains seeds and can be eaten as food. 2. A  fruit is the reproductive

NUR514W7

DISCUSSION: Once you received your case number; answer the specific question on the table above. Then, continue to discuss the 3 topics listed below for your case: 1. An effective health assessment incorporates not only physiological parameters; please suggest other parameters that should be considered and included on health assessments to reach

home work

Write a professional nursing article on a leadership topics Nurse Staffing. In the Interactive Discussion, you will be posting a link to the article or a PDF from a professional journal or other reputable health care source along with three insights that you gained from the article regarding the topic

CS65

Case Study Week 2 Patient Profile • Name: Sarah L., 32-year-old female • Occupation: Teacher • Chief Complaint: “My skin rash keeps getting worse and is really itchy.” • Onset: 2 weeks • Past Medical History: Mild seasonal allergies, no chronic illnesses • Medications: None • Social History: Lives with