Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

respond to discussion 1MR

Response to discussion 1

Rachael

In the medical field, I see more people over-cite than under-cite or plagiarize for fear of professional repercussions.  As a society, we advance by building on one’s ideas, specifically healthcare, in the sense that we grow on the successes and failures of others to advance our clinical practice guidelines and standards of care.  It is ingrained in us as medical professionals to give credit where credit is due.  In many cases, the author’s intent is not to cheat or steal someone’s ideas, but perhaps the fault lies in the institutional lack of adequate training and education on proper citing techniques.  In high school, my English teacher spent days teaching the MLA format. In nursing school, I was expected to utilize APA formatting by reading a book.  Luckily, I was afforded multiple opportunities before graduation to correct my deficiencies, and I did not intend to appear to be plagiarizing.  Perhaps the lack of hands-on educational instruction and societal understanding could be why we fail at properly citing our references. 

After reviewing all of the materials for Module 1, I wondered which ideas I had fully developed as opposed to being products of my experiences or that I had “stolen” from papers and videos in my many years in my profession and life.  If someone blatantly cheats off a test or copies a paper, then yes, that is wrong.  One is left to ponder our experiences, research, and exposure to information throughout life. At what point are our thoughts considered original?  Is there such a thing as an original idea? 

D’yani

Have you ever witnessed someone copying work? Did you hear about it from a family member or friend? Share a scenario that affected you and how you felt about the unethical behavior you witnessed (or heard about).

As a previous college student living on campus, I have witnessed other students copying work. In this particular situation, it had to do with one student having to complete an essay as an assignment and another student offering “services” to write other people’s essays or even do their homework altogether. There would be relatively large study groups, and I had overheard students talking about the deal. “I can write your essay for you or do your homework for you at this set price. I’m an amazing writer.” This is a perfect example of global plagiarism.
This situation may have not affected me directly but at the time it was a disappointing feeling for not just me but fellow students in the study group as well. For all of us to not only work hard to get into the college of our choice but working hard to maintain the work ethic to stay in school. To both of the students, not all deals/opportunities are worth making/paying money for, especially in this scenario. They aren’t learning anything. After witnessing the unethical behavior, it really just reminded me why I wanted to get my degree in the first place. I wasn’t being forced to be there, it’s a privilege/amazing opportunity to be able to attend a university. Not everyone gets to experience it. It motivated me to remain honest, authentic, have integrity, and not give into the social norm of cheating to cut corners out of convenience. It also motivated me to not surround myself with people who are okay with that behavior. The way someone does one thing is how they do everything.


Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

critical thinking 3

Module 3: Critical Thinking/Application Prompts  · Due Sunday by 11:59pm   · Points 50   · Submitting a text entry box Instructions Each week, you will be presented with a series of critical thinking prompts and application prompts. Please copy/paste the prompts into an offline document (Word, for example) and compose your responses offline (be

case4

Module 4 – Case HR Program Effectiveness; Employee Performance Management (Best Practices); Future of Talent Management Case Assignment (Signature Assignment: Critical thinking, Reinforced Level) After reading required materials in Module 4, review the following case (which is the same case read for SLP 4): Wirtz, J., & Heracleous, L. (2012). 

SLP4

Module 4 – SLP HR Program Effectiveness; Employee Performance Management (Best Practices); Future of Talent Management Assignment Overview After reading required materials in Module 4, review the following case (which is the same case read for Case 4): Wirtz, J., & Heracleous, L. (2012).  Singapore Airlines: Managing human resources for

Reflection 4

In the Module 4 Reflective Discussion, please reflect on everything you have learned in this course, by addressing the following:  Paragraphs 1-3:  Given the readings and assignments in the course, identify and discuss three important concepts applicable to your work experience, profession, and/or career plans for the future. Describe how

Benchmark 4

Benchmark #4: Project Report and/or Project Deliverable – Rough Draft(s)  I will send you the prior assignments that go along with this rough draft that you did for me prior to this draft. · Due Sunday by 11:59pm   · Points 200   · Submitting a file upload Please submit here a Rough Draft of

Human Resource Management 3 Assignment

Difference in Performance Review Imagine that you have an employee that rates themself very highly on their self-appraisal, but you know that their actual performance is very poor, and a have evaluated them accordingly in your managerial evaluation. How do you either bridge the gap or communicate the bad news?  

Human Resource Management

Purpose From your first assignment, you have a job description that details the important tasks and duties and KSAOs for the job you analyzed.  You will use that job title and job description for this assignment. For Assignment 2, you will demonstrate your understanding of job evaluation and pricing jobs

Individual Report Submission

Please see attached.  Example Individual Submission: Showcasing the Accessible Workplace Program LinkedIn Post Proud to share my work on the Accessible Workplace Program, a capstone project aimed at creating inclusive and supportive environments for employees with physical disabilities. I focused on redesigning job descriptions and developing onboarding strategies to ensure

Discussion 4 MR

On your TLC Home page, click on “Additional Library Resources” to access the IBISWorld Industry Research tool. · Click on “IBISWorld.” · Search “Business Coaching in the U.S.” · Click individually on the topics across the tan-colored ribbon above the “IBISWORLD Industry Report 61143” headline · Respond to the following:

Human Resource Management Assignment #6

The new benefit you propose must be something new and innovative. (The benefit should not be something already commonly offered as a benefit , e.g.: medical, dental, tuition reimbursement, etc.) Imagine that you are delivering this presentation to c-suite executives that are the decision-makers on the matter. Your objective is

Nov 4 Post about Long-term executive incentive

Please see attached.  List and describe five Long -Term Executive Incentives – Refer to Chapter 14 Compensation Of Special Groups The first part of Chapter 14 identifies and describes the unique characteristics that apply to special groups: · Supervisors · Corporate directors · Executives · Scientists and engineers (professionals) ·

benchmark 3

I have added benchmark 1 for your review.  There is no benchmark 2, so proceed with #3 Benchmark #3: Literature Review and Methodology  · Due Sunday by 11:59pm   · Points 150   · Submitting a file upload For Benchmark #3, please include the  most current, updated drafts of the following: 1. Your methodology section if

ogl 570 wk 2

OGL 570 Instructions In each module, you will have the opportunity to participate in an online discussion forum.  This week, you have a  choice of which prompt to respond to. Hot Tip:   It might be helpful to copy-paste the discussion prompts into an offline document (Word, for example), compose your responses

Module 3 Case

Module 3 – Case Metrics & Analytics; 360-Degree Feedback; Internships/Apprenticeships Assignment Overview Signature Assignment: Quantitative Reasoning, Reinforced Level In this assignment, your quantitative reasoning skills will be assessed at the “reinforced” level. The Quantitative Reasoning rubric will be useful for this purpose. In MGT511, quantitative reasoning skills were assessed at

module 3 SLP

Module 3 – SLP Metrics & Analytics; 360-Degree Feedback; Internships/Apprenticeships 360-Degree Appraisal The 360-degree appraisal approach entails collecting performance information from several workers who interact with the employee being evaluated. For example, information can be collected from supervisors, subordinates, customers, and peers. In some situations, employees also evaluate their own

Module 2 ogl 551

Module 1: Learning Materials IMPORTANT NOTE :   Anything in the  “Learning Materials” content area  (excluding “Supplemental Learning Materials”)  is “fair game” for the quizzes(as is any other content presented in the module).  You’ll also be doing some analysis and synthesis types of writing in this graduate-level course, so be sure to read