Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

respond to discussion 4.1

Respond to each one

Racheal

In June 2023, Ocean Gate’s submersible, the Titan, imploded on its journey to the Titanic’s wreckage in the Atlantic Ocean.  The Coast Guard initiated an investigation into the incident that left 5 individuals dead, including the co-founder of Ocean Gate, Stockton Rush.  The New Yorker (2023) alludes to Whistleblowers who were silenced as Ocean Gate pushed forward with unethical business decisions and infrastructure design when building the submersible. Engineers and submarine pilots warned against the structural materials and designs of the Cyclops II (renamed to Titan). Rush decided not to work with Det Norske Veritas (DNV) to classify the vehicle as it would hinder the project’s innovation (Taub, 2023).   Following an inspection of the carbon fiber reinforced plastic hull, a retired Irish Royal Navy submarine pilot and engineer, David Lochridge, submitted reports to Rush and his leadership team, reporting the multiple safety concerns that consequently ended with his firing.  After Lochridge filed his safety report with OSHA, Ocean Gates filed a summons to ruin Lochridge’s career for him to withdraw his safety concerns with the Department of Labor. (Taub, 2023)

As the investigation of the Titan unfolds, the choices made by OceanGate show a clear disrespect for ethical duty and safety and a startling lack of transparency. The corporation disregarded basic ethical standards necessary to preserve human life by prioritizing profit instead of thorough testing and safety precautions. Five people’s untimely deaths serve as a reminder of the terrible results of moral neglect and irresponsible corporate behavior. Companies in high-risk sectors must follow rigorous ethical guidelines and keep them open to guarantee all engaged parties’ welfare and safety.

 Trevor

Marketing, advertising, and ethics can merge in digital media. In early 2023, Bud Light’s engagement with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney was controversial. Conservative groups slammed the agreement as political pandering. Critics said Bud Light alienated its conventional customers by presenting a transgender person, resulting in boycotts and sales drops (Caruso, 2023). 
This incident highlights sensitive advertising ethics considerations about diversity and audience expectations. Bud Light’s inclusion of a diverse voice follows the trend of businesses addressing social concerns and promoting inclusivity. However, it illustrates the hazards of contentious message and the delicate balance organizations must strike when contemplating long-term customer alienation. The issue also highlighted political and cultural boundaries and showed how socially conscious brands can spark public debate (Liaukonyte, Tuchman, & Zhu, 2024). 
The case underscores the importance of responsible communication that coincides with a company’s values and considers its audience from a business ethics standpoint. Marketing ethical leadership requires recognizing these relationships and taking an open and courteous strategy that maintains brand integrity without compromising ethics or social responsibility. When interacting with sensitive social topics, corporations must consider the long-term sales decline and consumer polarization that followed this incident (Caruso, 2023; Liaukonyte et al., 2024). 

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

critical thinking 3

Module 3: Critical Thinking/Application Prompts  · Due Sunday by 11:59pm   · Points 50   · Submitting a text entry box Instructions Each week, you will be presented with a series of critical thinking prompts and application prompts. Please copy/paste the prompts into an offline document (Word, for example) and compose your responses offline (be

case4

Module 4 – Case HR Program Effectiveness; Employee Performance Management (Best Practices); Future of Talent Management Case Assignment (Signature Assignment: Critical thinking, Reinforced Level) After reading required materials in Module 4, review the following case (which is the same case read for SLP 4): Wirtz, J., & Heracleous, L. (2012). 

SLP4

Module 4 – SLP HR Program Effectiveness; Employee Performance Management (Best Practices); Future of Talent Management Assignment Overview After reading required materials in Module 4, review the following case (which is the same case read for Case 4): Wirtz, J., & Heracleous, L. (2012).  Singapore Airlines: Managing human resources for

Reflection 4

In the Module 4 Reflective Discussion, please reflect on everything you have learned in this course, by addressing the following:  Paragraphs 1-3:  Given the readings and assignments in the course, identify and discuss three important concepts applicable to your work experience, profession, and/or career plans for the future. Describe how

Benchmark 4

Benchmark #4: Project Report and/or Project Deliverable – Rough Draft(s)  I will send you the prior assignments that go along with this rough draft that you did for me prior to this draft. · Due Sunday by 11:59pm   · Points 200   · Submitting a file upload Please submit here a Rough Draft of

Human Resource Management 3 Assignment

Difference in Performance Review Imagine that you have an employee that rates themself very highly on their self-appraisal, but you know that their actual performance is very poor, and a have evaluated them accordingly in your managerial evaluation. How do you either bridge the gap or communicate the bad news?  

Human Resource Management

Purpose From your first assignment, you have a job description that details the important tasks and duties and KSAOs for the job you analyzed.  You will use that job title and job description for this assignment. For Assignment 2, you will demonstrate your understanding of job evaluation and pricing jobs

Individual Report Submission

Please see attached.  Example Individual Submission: Showcasing the Accessible Workplace Program LinkedIn Post Proud to share my work on the Accessible Workplace Program, a capstone project aimed at creating inclusive and supportive environments for employees with physical disabilities. I focused on redesigning job descriptions and developing onboarding strategies to ensure

Discussion 4 MR

On your TLC Home page, click on “Additional Library Resources” to access the IBISWorld Industry Research tool. · Click on “IBISWorld.” · Search “Business Coaching in the U.S.” · Click individually on the topics across the tan-colored ribbon above the “IBISWORLD Industry Report 61143” headline · Respond to the following:

Human Resource Management Assignment #6

The new benefit you propose must be something new and innovative. (The benefit should not be something already commonly offered as a benefit , e.g.: medical, dental, tuition reimbursement, etc.) Imagine that you are delivering this presentation to c-suite executives that are the decision-makers on the matter. Your objective is

Nov 4 Post about Long-term executive incentive

Please see attached.  List and describe five Long -Term Executive Incentives – Refer to Chapter 14 Compensation Of Special Groups The first part of Chapter 14 identifies and describes the unique characteristics that apply to special groups: · Supervisors · Corporate directors · Executives · Scientists and engineers (professionals) ·

benchmark 3

I have added benchmark 1 for your review.  There is no benchmark 2, so proceed with #3 Benchmark #3: Literature Review and Methodology  · Due Sunday by 11:59pm   · Points 150   · Submitting a file upload For Benchmark #3, please include the  most current, updated drafts of the following: 1. Your methodology section if

ogl 570 wk 2

OGL 570 Instructions In each module, you will have the opportunity to participate in an online discussion forum.  This week, you have a  choice of which prompt to respond to. Hot Tip:   It might be helpful to copy-paste the discussion prompts into an offline document (Word, for example), compose your responses

Module 3 Case

Module 3 – Case Metrics & Analytics; 360-Degree Feedback; Internships/Apprenticeships Assignment Overview Signature Assignment: Quantitative Reasoning, Reinforced Level In this assignment, your quantitative reasoning skills will be assessed at the “reinforced” level. The Quantitative Reasoning rubric will be useful for this purpose. In MGT511, quantitative reasoning skills were assessed at

module 3 SLP

Module 3 – SLP Metrics & Analytics; 360-Degree Feedback; Internships/Apprenticeships 360-Degree Appraisal The 360-degree appraisal approach entails collecting performance information from several workers who interact with the employee being evaluated. For example, information can be collected from supervisors, subordinates, customers, and peers. In some situations, employees also evaluate their own

Module 2 ogl 551

Module 1: Learning Materials IMPORTANT NOTE :   Anything in the  “Learning Materials” content area  (excluding “Supplemental Learning Materials”)  is “fair game” for the quizzes(as is any other content presented in the module).  You’ll also be doing some analysis and synthesis types of writing in this graduate-level course, so be sure to read