Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Response 1

200 word response 1 reference/intext citation

Due 2/14/2025

Etienne

 State if you agree or disagree with the first part of their response as to their thoughts about “Schedule F” workforce restructuring; and 2) review their answer to the 
second question and then explain how your ethics theory works differently then theirs and if your ethical theory would result in a different conclusion if the administrative agency is acting ethical or not in passing such a new agency rule for restructuring the agency workforce (ie. making many of the agency workers at-will political appointees)

Schedule F Executive Order and Ethical Relativism

            The Schedule F executive order instituted by President Trump in 2020 established a system that converted federal civil servants into political appointees who lacked previous job security. While President Biden rescinded the executive order, it was reinstated in January 2025. This discussion explores the ethical implications of Schedule F through the lens of moral relativism.

Pros and Cons of Schedule F

            Proponents advocate for Schedule F because they believe it creates better accountability and operational effectiveness among federal workers. Under this order, agency heads gain the authority to remove workers more efficiently, which helps maintain policy-aligned personnel across positions of influence (Ingle, 2025). According to supporters, this approach prevents bureaucratic resistance from interfering with policies from elected officials and streamlines government operations. However, critics argue that implementing Schedule F weakens the fundamental principles of impartial civil service administration for career employees. Removing job protection through this order establishes a framework where employers base hiring and dismissal decisions primarily on political affinity instead of professional skills (WBAL-TV 11 Baltimore, 2025). The lack of job protection under Schedule F threatens to diminish established expertise while introducing instability by lowering public confidence in federal agencies. Federal career professionals may avoid working for the federal government because extensive restructuring would create unstable job conditions.

Whether Schedule F Executive Order Is A Good Idea

            The Schedule F executive order is flawed because it violates the fundamental principles of an impartial civil service system with its nonpartisan framework. The Schedule F executive order provides better accountability by removing workers who support opposing policies but increases political interference to a degree that destabilizes federal agencies (WUSA9, 2024). The protective measures surrounding civil service protect public servants by ensuring they deliver service based on qualifications instead of political allegiance. Eliminating protections for civil servants allows political leaders to hire and fire employees based on personal allegiances instead of qualifications, thus creating a situation that could undermine the effectiveness and integrity of public institutions.

Ethical Relativism and Schedule F

            Under ethical relativism, people’s ethical standards emerge from their cultural backgrounds, societal guidelines, and personal beliefs. Within this ethical framework, no absolute standard of right or wrong exists since ethical principles differ from group to group and from context to context (Ingle, 2025). The reasons behind reclassifying federal employees through Schedule F depend entirely on how one aligns with cultural or political opinions under ethical relativism.

            From one standpoint, swiftly dismissing workers could benefit governmental efficiency according to a specific administrative view. A government focusing on both fast policy execution and employee loyalty will find ethical alignment with Schedule F. Within this perspective, implementing political goal-focused agency restructuring is required to enable elected leaders to deliver their policies successfully (WBAL-TV 11 Baltimore, 2025). Conversely, others may argue that civil service protections maintain democratic standards, according to some scholars, because they restrict politicized control of public agencies. People who value expert-driven nonpartisan bureaucracy consider the removal of job protections as unethical. An independent federal workforce ensures that federal operations rely on expertise instead of political alignments (WUSA9, 2024). Under the ethical relativist framework, Schedule F’s ethics depend on what core values each specific society or administration upholds. From an ethical relativist perspective, Schedule F status depends on how each administration interprets its public meaning.

Conclusion

            Schedule F remains a highly controversial executive order that provides both positive aspects and negative consequences. The scheduling system generates stronger governmental accountability while simplifying administrative processes but threatens to eliminate essential civil service safeguards and grant administration to direct political intervention. The moral assessment of this policy depends on how different observers interpret and value actions under ethical relativism concepts. Schedule F remains at the center of a public discussion that depicts it as vital administrative reform or endangerment to democratic systems.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Discussion

1. re emails effective means of communication?  Why or why not in the business setting.  Are there situations they should not be used? 2. day, instant messaging whether emails or texts is the norm. How should managers communicate with their staff?

Sab disc 3

review on video  Would you like to witness an execution? Why or why not?

SCS 285 Module One Project Prep

See the attachment below for assignment details. Module One Project Prep Guidelines and Rubric.html SCS 285 Module One Project Prep Guidelines and Rubric Overview In this assignment, you will submit research articles that uses each type of research (qualitative, quantitative) from the Shapiro Library social science database of your choice

510 replies

reply 1 5 100 words each reply *** In your responses, pick a different school of thought and provide another modern example, not previously discussed in your original post or your peer’s post. Challenge your peers’ perspectives and issues and provide your own insights and challenges. how would you consider

week 2 replies

discussions 1 5 100 words each reply Do you agree with your peer’s explanation of how fixed costs can turn into variable costs? Share your stance and bring in an example to add depth to the discussion. How might this concept impact budgeting decisions in different contexts? Discussion 2 reply

Write a reflection

[Provide a concise summary of key points from all assigned materials.] Critical Thinking [Analyze and connect the materials using these guiding questions: What are the key takeaways from this week’s materials? How do the materials connect to your experiences, current events, or previous course content? What aspects did you agree

DB Response

Please see attached. CJUS 410 Discussion Assignment Instructions You will complete 4 Discussions in this course. You will post one thread of at least 300 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday day of the assigned Module: Week. You must then post 2 replies of at least 150 words by

Case brief

I need you to write me a case brief of the international vs the state of washing case. below i attached the text of the case and i also attached the sample on how you should write the case brief.

criminal law wk 2

Criminal Law Exercise #1: Case Briefing   · Submitting a text entry box or a file upload  · Available after Oct 19 at 12am Using the Keeler Case brief format as a reference on pages 1.6.5, 1.6.6 & 1.6.8, provide a case briefing for  Texas v. JohnsonLinks to an external site., 491.

8-1 Project Three Submission

Please see attached below for assignment details. CJ 230 Project Three Template Domestic Violence Presentation Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information. Discretionary Decision Laws and Discretion Agency’s Culture Amount of Discretion Internal and External Discretion Situation 1 [Identify the discretionary decision.] [Explain how laws

Discussion

Review of a case for which poor lab management / quality had a negative impact. What areas of the materials are relevant to this incident? What was interesting about the case? How could the situation have been handled better?

Wk1 DB

Please see attached. CJUS 410 Discussion Assignment Instructions You will complete 4 Discussions in this course. You will post one thread of at least 300 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday day of the assigned Module: Week. You must then post 2 replies of at least 150 words by

Criminal Justice

“12 Angry Men” Explain how this movie can change public understanding of capital punishment. You need to use scholarly materials to support your statements. The film reflection notes are expected to be between 500 to 800 words that will include the following: 1. General introduction of film and explaining important

510 reply

510 replies In your responses focus on the Edwin Meese syndrome that is discussed in the chapter and offer insightful reflections, pose thought-provoking questions, and respectfully challenge the perspectives shared by your peers. 510 discussion 1 reply The conduct of PC Bob and the mayor can be analyzed under the

7-2 Project Two

Please see the attached below for assignment details. CJ 230 Project Two Template Memo to the Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information. To: Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee From: [Your Name] Date: [Date] Subject: Discretionary Actions of Judge I am the

CJ 305 Project Three

Please see the attached below for assignment details. Project Three Guidelines and Rubric.html CJ 305 Project Three Guidelines and Rubric Competency In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency: Analyze the criminalization of technology Scenario Someone has come into your station to file a police report.

week 3 discussions 535

discussions  2 discussions 250 word minimum Discussion 1 Why is the concept of the time value of money important for making long-term project decisions? Discussion 2 250 word minimum In a line item budget, you begin with initial inflationary adjustments only in an effort to explain how much is required

week 3 discussions 510

Discussion  2 discussions 250 word minimum Discussion 1 In Chapter 6, the authors provide two scenarios relating to lying within the criminal justice system. Box 6.1 focuses on police interrogations based on the case of  Miller v. Fenton . Box 6.2 is focused on the ethics of plea bargaining with