200 word response 1 reference/intext citation Due 3/27/2024
Vassel
“The validity of latent fingerprinting identification as a science has been receiving growing scholarly attention. The courts, however, have almost uniformly not only held that fingerprint identification withstands scrutiny under Daubert, but have largely ignored or sidestepped the scholarly arguments on the other side” (Mnookin, 2007). The validity of latent print identification is generally high, as fingerprints are unique to each individual and remain consistent throughout their lifetime. This uniqueness and stability make fingerprint analysis a widely accepted method for identifying suspects and linking them to crime scenes.
However, the validity of latent print identification can be affected by various factors, including the quality of the latent print, the expertise of the examiner, and the presence of partial or distorted prints. These issues can lead to false positives or inconclusive results, raising concerns about the reliability of fingerprint analysis in some cases.
These challenges in latent print identification can also impact the validity of other types of impression evidence, such as shoe prints, tire tracks, and tool marks. Like fingerprints, these types of evidence are often used to link suspects to crime scenes or objects, but they are also subject to similar limitations and potential errors. Factors such as the quality of the impression, the expertise of the examiner, and the presence of distortions can all affect the accuracy and reliability of impression evidence.
In cases where latent print identification is being questioned, the validity of other impression evidence may also be scrutinized, as these types of evidence share similar challenges and vulnerabilities. It is important for forensic examiners to be aware of these issues and to exercise caution when analyzing and interpreting impression evidence to ensure accurate results.
Overall, while latent print identification is generally considered a valid and effective method for identifying individuals, it is essential to acknowledge and address the challenges associated with this type of evidence. By understanding these issues and taking steps to mitigate potential errors, forensic examiners can enhance the validity and reliability of both latent print identification and other types of impression evidence in criminal investigations.
