Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Responsible management

BCOBM124 RESPONSIBLE MANAGEMENT FINAL EXAM with Rubrics

There are two tasks for the course grade.

Task 1 (MIDTERM EXAM) 40%: A group report of three students and a Team Presentation

Task 2 (FINAL EXAM) 60%: An Individual Written Informational Research Assignment

· This task is to be completed individually.

· You will be writing an Informational Research Essay in Harvard Style on one of the topics below. (your topic must be well supported by outside

sources)

· Your Informational Research Essay must include a clear thesis statement. This is the last sentence of the Introduction paragraph which clearly

states the three ideas you will write about in your essay.

Informational writing, also known as informative writing, is a form of non-fiction writing that aims to educate or inform the reader
about a specific topic or event. Here are some key features of informational writing:

1. Purpose: The primary goal of informational writing is to provide factual information. Unlike fiction or other types of nonfiction
texts, it doesn’t involve fictional characters or narratives.

2. Forms: Informative essays come in various forms:

o Explaining a process: These essays walk the reader through a step-by-step process (e.g., how a system works, how to
complete a task).

o Analyzing data: Informative essays can present data and analyze it to draw conclusions.

o Summarizing events: They summarize events, historical occurrences, or significant happenings.

o Comparing subjects: Essays that compare two or more subjects fall under this category.

3. Objective and Objective Tone: Informative essays are purely objective. When reading them, the reader should not encounter the
author’s opinion or perspective. Instead, they learn something factual.

4. Structure:

o Introduction: The essay starts with an introduction paragraph containing a thesis statement. Unlike persuasive essays,
where the thesis reflects the author’s position, in informative essays, it concisely states what the essay will cover. The

introduction also includes points to be discussed in the body paragraphs and an engaging hook to capture the reader’s
interest.

o Body: The body paragraphs make up the bulk of the content. Each paragraph focuses on a specific topic related to the
thesis statement. For process essays, the body explains the steps involved. For essays comparing events, each paragraph
summarizes one event.

o Conclusion: The conclusion recaps the points made in the body paragraphs and reiterates the thesis statement.

In summary, informational writing provides valuable knowledge without personal bias, allowing readers to learn and understand vari-
ous topics1

· You must upload your document via TurnitIn in Moodle.

Topics: Select one topic from this list.

• The impact of sustainable development on modern businesses.

• The impact of corporate social responsibility on a company.

• The impact of managing the triple bottom line on the company’s performance.

• The effects of a company’s environmental practices on consumer trust.

• The ways a company can create a healthy and more balanced work environment.

• The impact of ethics on a company.

Formalities:

Word Count: 1500 to 1800 words.

· Cover page, Index page, References and Appendix are excluded from the total wordcount.

• Prepare an Appendix page to follow the Reference page, for your summaries, paraphrases, graphs, charts, images, etc.

· Font: Arial 12.5 pts.

· Text alignment: Justified.

· The in-text References and the Bibliography in Harvard referencing style.

Submission: Week 13 – Via Moodle (Turnitin). Sunday, 12 May 2024 before 23.59 CET

Weight: This task is a 60% of your total grade for this subject.

It assesses the following learning outcomes:

• Identify and analysis principle of Responsible Management
• Identify and analysis a issue related to one of the key topics in the course.
• Develop, research and develop and Informational Research Essay.

Rubric Case Rubric for
Written Report and
Research Writing

l Exceptional 90-100 Good 80-89 Fair 70-79 Marginal fail 60-69

Knowledge &
Understanding (25%)

Student demonstrates
excellent understanding of key
concepts and uses vocabulary
in an entirely appropriate
manner.

Student demonstrates good
understanding of the task and
mentions some relevant
concepts and demonstrates
use of the relevant vocabulary.

Student understands the task
and provides minimum theory
and/or some use of
vocabulary.

Student understands the task and attempts
to answer the question but does not
mention key concepts or uses minimum
amount of relevant vocabulary.

Application
(25%)

Student applies fully relevant
knowledge from the topics
delivered in class.

Student applies mostly
relevant knowledge from the
topics delivered in class.

Student applies some relevant
knowledge from the topics
delivered in class.
Misunderstanding may be
evident.

Student applies little relevant knowledge
from the topics delivered in class.
Misunderstands are evident.

Critical Thinking (20%) Student critically assesses in
excellent ways, drawing
outstanding conclusions from
relevant authors.

Student critically assesses in
good ways, drawing
conclusions from relevant
authors and references.

Student provides some
insights but stays on the
surface of the topic.
References may not be
relevant.

Student makes little or no critical thinking
insights, does not quote appropriate authors,
and does not provide valid sources.

Communication (30%) The student shows exceptional
understanding of paraphrasing
and summarizing skills.
The student quotes
exceptionally well to support
his/her ideas.
Flawless use of Harvard
referencing conventions.
Flawless grammar, spelling
and correct wordcount.
Correctly created and
attached an appendix

The student shows
good understanding of
paraphrasing and summarizing
skills. The student quotes well
to support his/her ideas.
Makes correct use
of Harvard referencing
conventions.
Good grammar, spelling and
close to correct wordcount.
Created and attached an
appendix.

The student shows
marginally inadequate
understanding of
paraphrasing and
summarizing skills.
The student uses quotes
that are sometimes
irrelevant to his/her ideas.
Makes use of Harvard
referencing conventions
sometimes or with many
Mistakes/omissions. Some
clarity and concision. It may be
slightly over or under the
wordcount limit. Some
misspelling errors may be
evident. Attached an appendix

Student communicates their ideas in a
somewhat unclear and unconcise way. Does
not reach or does exceed wordcount
excessively and misspelling errors are
evident.
The student does not show
understanding of paraphrasing and
summarizing skills.
The student uses quotes that
are irrelevant or does not
quote at all.
Incorrect use of Harvard with multiple errors
or fails to use said conventions. Did not
attach an appendix

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

1.2.24 5.14.24

Think about your personal growth expectations and insights from the StrengthsFinder  Share how you plan to overcome obstacles and navigate challenges using your strengths in the PBL approach. Consider how your evolving definition of success aligned with your identified strengths shared in the assessment and how they will shape and

2 year plan

2 year plan INTRODUCTION In this class, one of the major sub-themes we’ve been exploring is personal development. We’ve been constantly thinking about how we can apply course concepts not just to our careers, but also to our lives, as well. Given that most of us are currently upperclassmen, our

SJC

What are the decisions you made? Completing the assignment with the stimulation I carefully reviewed looking into the information that was provided to me by my staff. I decided to go with $2 million toward training the physicians and pamphlets. I also decided to ship replacement devices to all users

CS

The  Case Study: Keeping Suzanne Chalmers is located in the  Additional Cases section in the back of the textbook. CASE 3: KEEPING SUZANNE CHALMERS By Steven L. McShane, University of Newcastle (Australia) Thomas Chan hung up the telephone and sighed. The vice president of software engineering at Advanced Photonics Inc. (API) had

W1 c

Instructions: Due  wed 05/16   . Case Information: For this case study assignment you will be using the WestLaw database find court cases that involve an area of fraud that interests you (financial statement fraud, Medicare fraud, etc. The first case you find needs to be settled in a civil court

week4

Instructions The Allied Group intends to expand the company’s operation by making significant investments in several opportunities available to the group. Accordingly, the group has identified a need for additional financing in preferred and new common stock and new bond issues. The (Krf) risk-free rate for the company is 7%,

W2 t2

Instructions: Due  wed 05/15   At least 3 paragraphs long with 3 peer-reviewed references. Topic 2 You are the fraud investigator on a case and you are certain the VP of Marketing has embezzled funds. The VP of Marketing has been under suspicion twice before on similar schemes but these suspicions were never

W2t2

Instructions: Due  wed 05/15   At least 3 paragraphs long with 3 peer-reviewed references. Topic 1 Employees have certain rights during a fraud investigation. These rights involve constitutional laws as well as other laws. Do you think these constitutional rights impede a fraud investigation and favor the employee or do you think these

Project Managemnt

Problem Set #2 Attached Files:  Business Case Exercise.docx  Business Case/Elevator Pitch ExerciseSee attached template for instructions.

Competency Discussion 44

Competency Discussion, respond to the following prompts within the Discussion area to engage with our faculty and prepare to begin the Competency.   Take a moment to reflect on leaders you admire. Select two people who you regard as exemplary leaders—one well known and one less well known. Describe the traits

UNV-103-O103

UNV-103 Week 2 DQ 2  University Success –  HOW I KNOW I AM LEARNING  Grand Canyon University   After reading the Topic 2 lecture in the online classroom, explain the following: •The relationship between the topic objectives, the assignment, and the rubric. •How is each component important to completing an

Costing Systems and Analysis

Option 1 Discuss the usage and creation of standard costs by your operation. How are these costs developed? How can they be used in the creation of a forecast? How can these be used in an individual or organizational measurement system? – OR – Option 2 Discuss a current business

research project – Ideas

Research Paper Part 1 Post ideas of fraud for approval PART 2 1. Imagine your intent is to make as much money as you can by committing fraud. Give a detailed description of how you would commit this fraud e.g.  individuals, companies and departments involved and impacted by your fraud

research project

Research Paper PART 1 1. Imagine your intent is to make as much money as you can by committing fraud. Give a detailed description of how you would commit this fraud e.g.  individuals, companies and departments involved and impacted by your fraud scheme, any other pertinent information to give a

Discussion Healthcare Finance

  What is an audit (in the context of financial accounting)? Can an audit ensure that fraud and theft are not present in the accounting system? Why or why not? What are some ways in which accounting for health care organizations (HCOs), especially not-for-profit (NFP) ones, tends to differ from

Business Finance – Accounting Assignment 1 675

see attached  BUSI 675 Application Assignment Instructions Overview Each application assignment is a comprehensive experiential learning experience and is directly related to business analysis and decision-making. The student will complete four application assignments (4). Instructions Each assignment must be a minimum of 3-5 pages of original discussion and analysis, not