Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

ROMCOM

Week 2: Content Application Assessment

  Levels of Achievement

Criteria A=93% to 100% Distinguished B=84% to 92% Proficient C = 75% to 83% Basic
D/F= 74% or below Non-
Performance

Criterion 1: (55 Points/55%) Uses the Community
Assessment Guide to collect
community/neighborhood level data for the
assigned categories; Community People
(Demographics and Health), Physical Environment,
Health, and Human Services. Uses comparative
data from county and state where indicated. Data
is accurately represented and complete.
Assessment includes an introduction and a
conclusion.

51 to 55 points

Uses the Community Assessment
Guide to collect data for the 3
assigned categories; Community
People, Physical Environment,
Health, and Human Services. Uses
comparative data from county and
state where indicated. Data is
accurately represented.
Assessment includes an
introduction and a conclusion.

46 to 50 points

Community assessment guide
includes all required data and
comparative data but may need
more detail/explanation.
Assessment includes an
introduction and a conclusion.

41 to 45 points

Community assessment guide is utilized
but some data and comparative data are
incomplete or county, state and federal
data are used too frequently for primary
data. May be missing an introduction or a
conclusion.

0 to 40 points

Uses the CAG to display data but a
significant amount of data is in the
wrong category or too broad, OR CAG
is not used and data is not accurate,
relevant /connected to the community.
May be missing both an introduction
and conclusion.

Criterion 2: (25 Points/25%) Displays all data
required in the Community Assessment Guide
(CAG) in a clear, concise, and organized manner.
Integrates and applies information/ uses skills
gained from assigned readings, course content, and
discussions. Uses the comment section in the CAG
to provide context or to make clarifications where
needed.

23.25 to 25 points

Displays all data required in the
Community Assessment Guide
(CAG) in a clear, concise, and
organized manner. Integrates and
applies information/ uses skills
gained from assigned readings,
course content, and discussions.
Uses the comment section in the
CAG to provide context or to make
clarifications where needed.

21 to 23 points

Displays most data in a clear,
concise, and organized manner.
Integrates and applies information/
uses skills gained from assigned
readings, course content, and
discussions. Uses the comment
section in the CAG to provide
context or to make clarifications
where needed.

18 to 20 points

Some data is confusing/disorganized,
incomplete or lacks clarity. Stronger
evidence of integration of course content
and outside resources needed. May not
use the comment section to provide
context or make clarifications when
required.

0 to 17 points

Data is mostly disorganized, or
unformatted, lacks clarity and/or
multiple categories are incomplete
throughout. Majority of categories are
incomplete and explanations are not
utilized when needed.

Criterion 3: (10 Points/13%) Includes at least one
reference from this week’s learning and one new,
current (within 3 years), peer-reviewed scholarly
source from the UIC library that is not listed in the
course material. (This is the minimum; other
references can be utilized to provide more
support.) References are related to content.

9.3 to 10 points

Includes at least one reference
from this week’s learning and one
new, current (within 3 years), peer-
reviewed scholarly source from
the UIC library that is not listed in
the course material. (This is the
minimum; other references can be
utilized to provide more support.)
References are related to content.

8.4 to 9.2 points

Includes at least one resource from
the Learning Resources and one
current resource from the UIC
Library on the topic that is peer
reviewed and < 3 years old.
Resource is somewhat appropriate
to the topic. Content included is
synthesized from the resources (not
simply copied and pasted.)

7.5 to 8.3 points

Includes at least one resource from the
Learning Resources and one current
resource from the UIC Library on the topic
that is peer reviewed and < 3 years old.
Content included is mostly synthesized
from the resources but some content lacks
connection and/or some statements in the
paper do not match references.

0 to 7.4 points

Includes only 1 required resource
and/or some statements or data in the
paper do not match references.
Content is not synthesized and/or is
simply copied and pasted with
minimal evidence of connection to
resource or assigned resources are not
utilized as required or references are
not included.

Criterion 4: (10 Points/13 %) Writing is clear, with
appropriate spelling, sentence structure and
punctuation. Data is cited. In-text citations have a
corresponding reference listing. Complete and
error-free APA formatting is utilized for both
reference (s) and in-text citations. Direct
quotations are not used.

9.3 to 10 points

Writing is clear, with appropriate
spelling, sentence structure and
punctuation. Data is cited
appropriately. In-text citations
have a corresponding reference
listing. Complete and error-free
APA formatting is utilized for both
reference (s) and in-text citations.
Direct quotations are not used.

8.4 to 9.2 points

No more than 2-4 formatting/APA
errors. Writing is clear, with
appropriate spelling, sentence
structure and punctuation. In- text
citations are used with a
corresponding reference listings
Most data is cited. Direct quotations
are not used.

7.5 to 8.3 points

4-5 formatting, writing, grammar, or APA
errors and/or in-text citations may not be
present or match reference (s). Some data
points not cited. Direct Quotations are not
used

0 to 7.4 points

More than 5 grammar, spelling,
writing, or APA errors and paper is
very difficult to follow due to
structure/formatting issues and/or
direct quotations are used frequently.
In text citations are used
inappropriately, infrequently or
completely omitted where required.
Data is rarely cited or not cited at all.

Name

Description

Rubric Detail

6/1/25, 4:10 PM Working Master Template NURS 362

1/2

View Associated Items

Print Close Window

6/1/25, 4:10 PM Working Master Template NURS 362

2/2

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

PPT

Assigment The term “knowledge worker” was first coined by management consultant and author Peter Drucker in his book,  The Landmarks of Tomorrow  (1959). Drucker defined knowledge workers as high-level workers who apply theoretical and analytical knowledge, acquired through formal training, to develop products and services. Does this sound familiar? Nurses are

Mental Health PTSD

Mental Illness Creative Paper Assignment “A Day Living With My Mental Illness” Each student will write a one-page paper in first person as if you are living with your assigned mental illness. Be creative but realistic. The goal is to demonstrate understanding of what daily life might feel like for

discussion question

discussion question  Topic: healthcare providers shortages 1. Access the Policy Map Blog and view the blog listings (There are many pages of entries). 2. Briefly summarize (2-3 sentences) policy map blog and address the socio-political, ethical, and or nursing workforce implications of the topic. 3. APA format for references

Peer response

  The development of advanced practice nursing roles globally shows how important quality and safety competencies are in guiding practice. When looking at the variability in education, regulation, and scope of practice across countries, it becomes clear that standardized competencies are essential to ensure safe and consistent care (Wheeler et

nursing

see file In this two-part deliverable assessment, first, create a 5–7 slide elevator-speech style presentation that you will present to stakeholders that provides an overview of policy implementation, including rationale and data that reflect the need for the new policy. Second, create a detailed, annotated training agenda for the pilot

nursing

see file Propose an organizational policy and practice guidelines that you believe will lead to an improvement in quality and performance associated with the benchmark underperformance you advocated for improving in Assessment 1. Be precise, professional, and persuasive in demonstrating the merit of your proposed actions. The policy proposal requirements

case study

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

casestudy

Nursing Skills & Reasoning © 2023 KeithRN LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this case study may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of KeithRN Blood Transfusion 1. Which

CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

PLEASE READ ALL ATTACHED Week 2 Case Study Prompt  A 28-year-old African American woman presents with 4 months of worsening fatigue, joint  pain, and intermittent low-grade fevers. She reports: • Symmetrical pain and stiffness in hands and wrists (morning stiffness ~1 hour) • Photosensitivity • Facial rash that worsens with

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF SECONDARY DATA SOURCES

find attached n use the rubrics In this information age, where data are readily accessible and there is both a great demand for accelerated research projects and strict limitations on research funding, using existing data makes sense. Data used in this way are called secondary data; they come in many

Evaluation and Management

Evaluation and Management (E/M) Insurance coding and billing is complex, but it boils down to how to accurately apply a code, or CPT (current procedural terminology), to the service that you provided. The payer then reimburses the service at a certain rate. As a provider, you will have to understand

EBP

Module 7:  Research Project As a DNP, you have been asked to identify why the patients that are undergoing surgery are complaining that pain experienced after a surgical procedure has not been managed adequately. The patients’ need of narcotics is around the clock until the pain subsides. The lack of

Home work

Determine the linear correlation and regression equation between two variables to make predictions for the dependent variable. Project Deliverable tie to Competency  In this assignment, you will demonstrate your understanding of how relationships between two variables can be analyzed and used to make informed predictions. By interpreting scatter plots, conducting

DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY: DATA SOURCES AND DATA COLLECTION

Diabetes is a significant public health challenge in the United States, with Table 3.2 identifying Hemoglobin A1C levels, incidence of skin infections, obesity, peripheral neuropathy, and renal insufficiency as key measurable outcomes (Curley, 2024). The population selected for this discussion is Hispanic/Latino adults in the United States, a group disproportionately

Community Health

Please see attached. Create a slide presentation of the health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1. Complete the following: · Prepare a 12–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with detailed speaker notes that reflects your presentation. This presentation is the implementation of the plan you created in Assessment 1. The speaker

Scholarship For Nursing practice

It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. . All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format.

Week 1 clinic skills

Rate yourself according to your confidence level performing the procedures identified on the Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form.   Based on your ratings, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement.    Based on your self-assessment and theory of nursing practice, develop three to four (3–4) measurable goals and objectives for this practicum experience. Include them on the designated area of the form.