Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

ROMCOM

Week 2: Content Application Assessment

  Levels of Achievement

Criteria A=93% to 100% Distinguished B=84% to 92% Proficient C = 75% to 83% Basic
D/F= 74% or below Non-
Performance

Criterion 1: (55 Points/55%) Uses the Community
Assessment Guide to collect
community/neighborhood level data for the
assigned categories; Community People
(Demographics and Health), Physical Environment,
Health, and Human Services. Uses comparative
data from county and state where indicated. Data
is accurately represented and complete.
Assessment includes an introduction and a
conclusion.

51 to 55 points

Uses the Community Assessment
Guide to collect data for the 3
assigned categories; Community
People, Physical Environment,
Health, and Human Services. Uses
comparative data from county and
state where indicated. Data is
accurately represented.
Assessment includes an
introduction and a conclusion.

46 to 50 points

Community assessment guide
includes all required data and
comparative data but may need
more detail/explanation.
Assessment includes an
introduction and a conclusion.

41 to 45 points

Community assessment guide is utilized
but some data and comparative data are
incomplete or county, state and federal
data are used too frequently for primary
data. May be missing an introduction or a
conclusion.

0 to 40 points

Uses the CAG to display data but a
significant amount of data is in the
wrong category or too broad, OR CAG
is not used and data is not accurate,
relevant /connected to the community.
May be missing both an introduction
and conclusion.

Criterion 2: (25 Points/25%) Displays all data
required in the Community Assessment Guide
(CAG) in a clear, concise, and organized manner.
Integrates and applies information/ uses skills
gained from assigned readings, course content, and
discussions. Uses the comment section in the CAG
to provide context or to make clarifications where
needed.

23.25 to 25 points

Displays all data required in the
Community Assessment Guide
(CAG) in a clear, concise, and
organized manner. Integrates and
applies information/ uses skills
gained from assigned readings,
course content, and discussions.
Uses the comment section in the
CAG to provide context or to make
clarifications where needed.

21 to 23 points

Displays most data in a clear,
concise, and organized manner.
Integrates and applies information/
uses skills gained from assigned
readings, course content, and
discussions. Uses the comment
section in the CAG to provide
context or to make clarifications
where needed.

18 to 20 points

Some data is confusing/disorganized,
incomplete or lacks clarity. Stronger
evidence of integration of course content
and outside resources needed. May not
use the comment section to provide
context or make clarifications when
required.

0 to 17 points

Data is mostly disorganized, or
unformatted, lacks clarity and/or
multiple categories are incomplete
throughout. Majority of categories are
incomplete and explanations are not
utilized when needed.

Criterion 3: (10 Points/13%) Includes at least one
reference from this week’s learning and one new,
current (within 3 years), peer-reviewed scholarly
source from the UIC library that is not listed in the
course material. (This is the minimum; other
references can be utilized to provide more
support.) References are related to content.

9.3 to 10 points

Includes at least one reference
from this week’s learning and one
new, current (within 3 years), peer-
reviewed scholarly source from
the UIC library that is not listed in
the course material. (This is the
minimum; other references can be
utilized to provide more support.)
References are related to content.

8.4 to 9.2 points

Includes at least one resource from
the Learning Resources and one
current resource from the UIC
Library on the topic that is peer
reviewed and < 3 years old.
Resource is somewhat appropriate
to the topic. Content included is
synthesized from the resources (not
simply copied and pasted.)

7.5 to 8.3 points

Includes at least one resource from the
Learning Resources and one current
resource from the UIC Library on the topic
that is peer reviewed and < 3 years old.
Content included is mostly synthesized
from the resources but some content lacks
connection and/or some statements in the
paper do not match references.

0 to 7.4 points

Includes only 1 required resource
and/or some statements or data in the
paper do not match references.
Content is not synthesized and/or is
simply copied and pasted with
minimal evidence of connection to
resource or assigned resources are not
utilized as required or references are
not included.

Criterion 4: (10 Points/13 %) Writing is clear, with
appropriate spelling, sentence structure and
punctuation. Data is cited. In-text citations have a
corresponding reference listing. Complete and
error-free APA formatting is utilized for both
reference (s) and in-text citations. Direct
quotations are not used.

9.3 to 10 points

Writing is clear, with appropriate
spelling, sentence structure and
punctuation. Data is cited
appropriately. In-text citations
have a corresponding reference
listing. Complete and error-free
APA formatting is utilized for both
reference (s) and in-text citations.
Direct quotations are not used.

8.4 to 9.2 points

No more than 2-4 formatting/APA
errors. Writing is clear, with
appropriate spelling, sentence
structure and punctuation. In- text
citations are used with a
corresponding reference listings
Most data is cited. Direct quotations
are not used.

7.5 to 8.3 points

4-5 formatting, writing, grammar, or APA
errors and/or in-text citations may not be
present or match reference (s). Some data
points not cited. Direct Quotations are not
used

0 to 7.4 points

More than 5 grammar, spelling,
writing, or APA errors and paper is
very difficult to follow due to
structure/formatting issues and/or
direct quotations are used frequently.
In text citations are used
inappropriately, infrequently or
completely omitted where required.
Data is rarely cited or not cited at all.

Name

Description

Rubric Detail

6/1/25, 4:10 PM Working Master Template NURS 362

1/2

View Associated Items

Print Close Window

6/1/25, 4:10 PM Working Master Template NURS 362

2/2

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

help with home work

Help with Homework Nurs 506 Unit 4 Assignment: Case Study: Malpractice and Patient Abandonment Wendy, RN, has worked in the pediatric unit at Hope Hospital for over three years. She has accepted the day shift assignment consisting of five pediatric patients under the age of 10, three RSV patients, and

YISELL ASSESS

The goal of this assignment is to help you develop critical thinking skills by exploring how to approach common clinical complaints that nurses frequently encounter. You will examine possible differential diagnoses and discuss how these conditions are evaluated in different care settings. Complaint: Headache For the above complaint: Identify three

nursing outcome

Nursing Program Occupational Violence Course CDC *To be completed anytime throughout the semester – due with SIM Day 4 documents LINK: Complete this course (approximately 3 hours) & submit a screenshot of proof of completion to the Sim Day 4 assignments folder. The training includes video clips, so please bring headphones

The Introduction Discussion

The Introduction Please answer the questions below. 1. What should be included in an introductory paragraph of the research paper? 2. Select an introduction from scholarly, peer-reviewed research, and appraise the introduction to assess whether it includes the necessary elements of an introduction. Why and why not? 3. How does

Literature Review and Evidence Matrix

Literature Review & Evidence Matrix Assignment For this assignment, you will prepare a 3 to 4-page review of the literature pertinent to hypertension for healthcare research and use that review to propose a methodology to address the problem. My PICOT is: In adults with hypertension, does advanced practice nurse–led self-management

GUIDED REFLECTION

GUIDED REFLECTION Study without reflection is a waste of time, Reflection without study is dangerous.  —Confucius (Clark, 2011). Reflection of an experience, lesson learned, and/or importance of a role, demonstrates a clear understanding of process, comprehension, and expertise. To reflect requires an ability to consider lessons learned, personal connections, and

Lorem, Ipsum

Unit 4 Literature for the Problem Identification Paper Instructions: Choose one article that will serve as the Clinical Practice Problem addressed by KTA Framework 1. Bailey, N., Mitchell, K., & Miller, T. (2024). Opioid misuse harm reduction. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 35(1), 3-14. 2. Bhochhibhoya, S., Allen, J., Cheney, M.,

Can you help by tomorrow?

PHIL 347 Critical Reasoning Week 4 Guided Learning Activity: Inductive Reasoning and Causal Evaluation Directions: Type the letter answer into Canvas. You may also include the whole line. The letter comes before the line or sentence Example: [A] Paris is the biggest city in France. [B] It is a major

Question

1. What factors differentiate the history and experience of African Americans from those of Asian, Latino, and Native Americans? 2. Define African American Studies & enumerate its major educational and social objectives. 3. What is the role of culture in Black Studies and how does this make it different from

Nursing Literature

See Attachment While the implementation plan prepares students to apply their research to the problem or issue they have identified for their capstone project change proposal, the literature review enables students to map out and move into the active planning and development stages of the project. A literature review analyzes

Nursing Homework

Week 5 Literature Summary assignment General Instructions   1. Select and review five research articles related to the practice issue and proposed intervention of your PICOT question developed in Week 2.  These articles may include quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods studies (original research), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or meta-syntheses (synthesis), or clinical

Nursing Assignment

NAME ADDRESS TOWN, STATE January 12, 2024 Jane Doe Director of Nursing Eldercare of Bemidji 123 Smart Street Bemidji, MN 56601 Dear Jane Doe: It is with a heavy heart that I submit my resignation from my position as LPN Coordinator effective January 15th. This decision was not an easy

Nursing Population assignment

 concerning one of the patient cases listed  Determine which medication would be most appropriate to prescribe from the assigned vulnerable population patient case medication choices. Explain your rationale for choosing this medication. Explain why the other medications listed are not appropriate for this patient. Explain the dosing schedule for the

Sys ip 4

Explain why it is a public health issue and what is currently being done to address it at the local, state, and federal levels.  Discuss any applicable health policies and regulations that may be in place to address the issue.

Ip Sys 3

Provide a thorough analysis of managed care, and discuss how it, as a delivery method, has facilitated the transfer of health services to outpatient and other nontraditional settings of care.  Discuss the impact that managed care has on the access, financing, and delivery of healthcare in the United States.  Discuss

Sys db 3

Complete the following tasks: Compare and contrast the ways that state and local governments can work with healthcare organizations to foster integration between primary care and public health.  Discuss the importance of linking primary care and public health and some of the challenges in doing so.

Cap db 4

Your first task is to post your own Key Assignment Outline to the discussion area so that other students are able to review your plan. Attach your document to the main discussion post, and include any notes you feel are appropriate. The purpose of this assignment is to help improve