Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

see below

Follow instructions on this

Due Mar 9 by 10:59pm
Points 80
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0
Allowed Attempts 2

Start Assignment

Back to Week at a Glance
(

In this week’s Learning Resources, there is a video with historical footage of immigrants arriving at Ellis
Island in New York Harbor. If you have not viewed this video, stop and do so now—or watch it again, this
time with the perspective of what it would feel like to be in that scene. You may have relatives that
arrived through Ellis Island or a similar entry point in other parts of the country. Imagine being in that
moment, having endured great hardship, and then facing a test that checks your intelligence—and for no
small reason. It will determine whether you can enter the United States.

Based on what you are learning about culture, is it likely that test would be fair in assessing the
knowledge of those who speak languages other than English and have wildly different sets of
experiences? Additionally, different cultures have different definitions of intelligence. Some cultures
integrate movement and emotions into the concept of intelligence. Other cultures value analytical
thinking. Still others highlight nonverbal communication. Sadly, many Ellis Island immigrants were
labeled “feeble-minded” by extremely biased intelligence tests and, after all those hardships, were
refused entry into America.

You will return to the issue of bias by examining how intelligence tests can favor some cultures over
others. Through the Learning Resources, you will experience two unique intelligence tests and imagine
how you might do if each test had major stakes for you—such as whether you could vote, be accepted
by a college, or be allowed to enter a country. Intelligence tests have been used for those and other
purposes—and sometimes with the express purpose of excluding some groups over others.

For this Assignment, you will examine how culture influences the perspective from which various people
view the concept of “intelligence.” As you take the Chitling Test and Original Australian Test, you may find
yourself wondering what some questions have to do with intelligence. Just remember, many tests
throughout history have been based on the idea that there are things that “everyone” should know. When
you take the Free IQ Test, you may find that the questions are more familiar, but is that just because of
your cultural background?

INTELLIGENCE

Review the Learning Resources for this week, with particular attention to Chapter 5 in the course text
and the media program on Ellis Island immigration.
Access and complete the Free IQ Test found in the Learning Resources for this week. Note: This test
is to be completed online. Make sure to save your results.
Access and complete “The Original Australian Test of Intelligence” and “The Chitling Intelligence
Test,” in the Learning Resources. Note: The tests cannot be filled in online. Use paper and pencil to
record your answers, and then click the scoring sheet link to check your results.
Consider how well you did on each test. What kind of knowledge was needed to do well, and how
“common” is that knowledge? Consider questions in all three tests that stand out to you as examples
of cultural bias.
Based on your experience, consider what conclusions you can draw about the meaning of
“intelligence” and “common knowledge” across cultures and the potential for constructing an
intelligence test without cultural bias.
Consider the various views of intelligence discussed in your Learning Resources and consider how
they are similar or different from your own views.
Keep in mind the goal of supporting your viewpoints with clear reasoning and evidence as noted in
the Walden Writing Center resources. Consider how you can incorporate the use of evidence in your
writing to further develop your scholarly writing skills.
Review the Writing Center resources to understand APA style and the overall expectations of
scholarly writing at Walden. Use the “Undergraduate Paper with Advice APA 7” course template for
this Assignment.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES (

TO PREPARE:

ASSIGNMENT:

PSYC_2001_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

Write a 2-page paper that addresses the following components. Be sure to include references to
Learning Resources, including media.

Explain how immigrants at Ellis Island must have felt when presented with questions that may not
have made any sense to them. (Note: After taking the Chitling and Australian tests, you may be able
to relate.) Discuss whether or not you have ever felt that standardized tests did not accurately assess
your abilities. Why or why not?
Though many common standardized tests, including IQ tests, are considered to be dependable and
valid, is it possible that they are biased simply because they were made with one cultural view of
intelligence in mind? Further explain your thoughts on the issue of bias in intelligence testing based
on your readings and activities this week.
Compare your own view of intelligence with the various perspectives studied this week. What
cultures have perspectives similar to yours?
Do you believe that intelligence can be measured in a way that is fair to everyone? Describe how you
would assess abilities and potential fairly.

Support the responses within your assignment with credited evidence from the assigned learning
resources (including sentence-level citations). Provide a reference list in APA Style for resources you
used in the assignment.

Submit your Assignment.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check
your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn+last
name+first initial.

2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

BY DAY 7

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Criteria Ratings Pts

10 pts

15 pts

Explain how
immigrants at
Ellis Island
must have felt
when
presented
with
questions that
may not have
made any
sense to
them.
Discuss
whether or
not you have
ever felt that
standardized
tests did not
accurately
assess your
abilities. Why
or why not?
(10 points)

10 pts
A

Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

8.5 pts
B

Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains some
details and/or
explanation;
includes
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

7.5 pts
C

Response is
somewhat
complete and/or
is somewhat
accurate;
and/or does not
contain
sufficient details
and/or
explanation;
includes some
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

6.5 pts
D

Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

0 pts
F

Response is
incomplete or
not provided;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained;
does not
include
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

Is it possible
that
intelligence
tests are
biased simply
because they
were made
with one
cultural view
of intelligence
in mind?
Further
explain your
thoughts on
the issue of
bias in
intelligence
testing. (15
points)

15 pts
A

Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

12 pts
B

Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains some
details and/or
explanation;
includes
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

11 pts
C

Response is
somewhat
complete and/or
is somewhat
accurate;
and/or does not
contain
sufficient details
and/or
explanation;
includes some
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

9 pts
D

Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

0 pts
F

Response is
incomplete or
not provided;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained;
does not
include
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

Criteria Ratings Pts

20 pts

20 pts

15 pts

Compare
your own
view of
intelligence
with the
various
perspectives
studied this
week. What
cultures have
perspectives
similar to
yours? (20
points)

20 pts
A

Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

17 pts
B

Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains some
details and/or
explanation;
includes
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

15 pts
C

Response is
somewhat
complete and/or
is somewhat
accurate;
and/or does not
contain
sufficient details
and/or
explanation;
includes some
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

13 pts
D

Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

0 pts
F

Response is
incomplete or
not provided;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained;
does not
include
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

Do you
believe that
intelligence
can be
measured in
a way that is
fair to
everyone?
Describe how
you would
assess
abilities and
potential
fairly. (20
points)

20 pts
A

Response is
complete and
accurate;
contains
sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
includes
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

17 pts
B

Response is
complete and
mostly
accurate;
contains some
details and/or
explanation;
includes
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

15 pts
C

Response is
somewhat
complete and/or
is somewhat
accurate;
and/or does not
contain
sufficient details
and/or
explanation;
includes some
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

13 pts
D

Response is
incomplete or
is mostly
inaccurate;
lacks sufficient
details and/or
explanation;
does not
include
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

0 pts
F

Response is
incomplete or
not provided;
answers are
inaccurate
and/or not
explained;
does not
include
credited
supporting
evidence from
the Learning
Resources.

Quality of
Writing (15
points)

15 pts
A
Writing is clear
and organized
with few or no
errors in

12 pts
B
Writing is
mostly clear
and organized
with few MUGS

11 pts
C
Writing is
somewhat
clear and
organized with

9 pts
D
Writing is
mostly unclear
and
disorganized

0 pts
F
Writing is
unclear
and/or
disorganized

Total Points: 80

Criteria Ratings Pts

mechanics,
usage,
grammar, or
spelling
(MUGS). There
is a
preponderance
of original
writing (i.e., use
of own words
and proper
paraphrasing).
Information from
the Learning
Resources is
fully provided
and correctly
documented
with citation(s)
and reference(s)
in correct APA
style.

errors. Writing
is original (i.e.,
use of own
words and
proper
paraphrasing).
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
mostly
provided and
correctly
documented
with citation(s)
and
reference(s) in
correct APA
style.

some MUGS
errors. Most
writing is
mostly original
(i.e., use of
own words and
proper
paraphrasing)
but may rely on
the use of
some direct
quotations.
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
partially
provided
and/or
incorrectly
documented
with citation(s)
and/or
reference(s),
and/or
citations(s) and
reference(s) do
not follow
correct APA
style.

and/or
contains many
MUGS errors.
There is an
overuse of
direct
quotations
and/or
ineffective
paraphrasing.
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
significantly
lacking and/or
is incorrectly
documented
and/or
citation(s) and
reference(s)
do not follow
correct APA
style.

and/or
contains
many MUGS
errors. There
is an
underuse of
original
writing and
an overuse of
directly
quoted
content.
Information
from the
Learning
Resources is
not cited or
referenced in
any way.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Discussion board post

For this discussion, you will articulate your process for approaching a literature review that will help refine your annotated bibliography. 

Spring 2025

I am hoping to reconnect with Sheryl Hogan Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title Putting It All Together Directions: Read the directions carefully for each section and completely fill in the table for all 4 parts. Part 1: Source Review For Part I, review Adira, et al.’s (2022)

Excel

Communications Template Stakeholder Name Role Information Timeframe Media Responsible for Updates Responsible for Delivery

home work

Please follow instructions and No Ai . Please no copyright LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Funder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle (9th ed.). W. W. Norton. Chapter 9, “Basics of Psychoanalysis” Chapter 10, “Psychoanalysis After Freud: Neo-Freudians, Object Relations, and Current Research” Walden University Writing Center. (2021). Using quotations, part

Presentation

Powerpoint presentation instructions are listed below  Presentation Grading Rubric PSYC2430 Name: Course: Title: Quality of Visual Aids ___/4 Script/knowledge of Material ___/3 Title and Hypothesis ___/3 Variables and Reasoning ___/3 Previous Research Review ___/3 Participants and Material ___/3 Procedure ___/3 Creativity ___/3 TOTAL ________ / 25 · Make sure to

week 6 discussion

  Collapse Describe the variety of ways that one can assess the validity of an instrument in terms of our self-esteem measure. If we were creating a new measure of self-esteem, what is the process that we would use to validate this measure?

psychology 1

Skip to main content My Account Page path Home StraighterLine Moodle Username Password Remember username Log in Forgotten your username or password? Cookies must be enabled in your browser Some courses may allow guest access Log in as a guest © 2023 StraighterLine. All rights reserved

Psychology ADVERTISEMENT ASSIGNMENT

   Build upon the topic selected in the Psychoeducational Group Plan Assignment to focus on developing a psychotherapy group. The first step in this process is to create a recruitment flyer that effectively communicates the purpose and structure of the group while attracting suitable members.    Watch from 1:05:35 to 1:23:15.

Impact of Life Experiences on Development

How does life experiences impact development? The Impact of Life Experiences on Development Complete a 7- to 9-page (not including title page and references) paper with the following criteria: Choose four events from your life which you believe had a significant impact on your development. There must be at least

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Analysis of the Terms: Polarization and Groupthink After reading the module and the assigned references, students will complete a written assignment where they explain and analyze, in their own words, the terms  Polarization and  Groupthink. The task includes: · Providing a concrete example of how a group demonstrates each

Group Dynamics

see attachment    Effects of Groupthink After reading the module and the article by Smith (or the article selected by the course instructor), each student will critically analyze the material and critically address the following question and points for analysis: Article:  Smith, T. E. (2016). The road to high-quality decision-making:

Car & pow

ECED 6260: Career Development and Appraisal Spring 2025 Career Project Rubric Total Points: 100 You will create an individual presentation that includes a written portion, visual component, and class presentation/powerpoint submission. Each student will be required to write a paper and to create a powerpoint presentation. A very general guide

home work

Please follow instructions . No Ai LEARNING RESOURCES Required Readings Funder, D. C. (2024). The personality puzzle (9th ed.). W. W. Norton. Chapter 5, “Traits and Types: The Big Five and Beyond” Chapter 6, “Personality Stability, Development, and Change” Truity. ( (2021). Truity.com Locate the Personality Tests drop down menu

Identify Different Theories of Gender Development

Social learning theory and cognitive development theory have valid criticisms when applied to gender development. However, when viewed together, they do a fairly good job of describing how gender develops in children.  Studying and reviewing these two theories for your assignment this week will help you prepare for your signature

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Content Analysis After studying, analyzing, and reflecting on the module’s content and references, students will: · Write an analysis on how important they consider observation and analysis of group functioning to be for the effectiveness and achievement of the group’s goals. · Provide a supported response to the

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Use of Observation Keys After studying this module, students will: · Identify and select a type of group to describe and analyze its forms of communication. · To structure their writing, students will use the key questions for group observation presented in the module. · Once their contribution

Group Dynamics

see attachment  Reading Analysis Students must read the articles by Gervits et al. (2016) and Felps et al. (2006). Gervits, F., Eberhard, K., & Scheutz, M. (2016). Team communication as a collaborative process.  Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3(62), 1-14. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00062  to an external site. Felps, W., Mitchell, T.R.,