Description
اريد بحث كامل وشامل وتستخدم في المطلوب بالصوره والمراجع بالصور المرفقه بعنوان Photon-counting CT
aurid bahth kamil washamil watustakhdam fi almatlub bialsuwarih walmarajie bialsuwar almirfaqah bieunwan Photon-counting CT
Academic Essay in Advanced Biomedical Imaging Technology
Important Instructions
-This assignment is to be completed individually.
-The deadline for submission is 12 October 2025.
-Any delayed submission will result in a 5% deduction of the total marks.
The total mark for this assignment is 20 marks.
Assignment Brief
You are required to write an academic essay (1,000 words) on an advanced biomedical
imaging technique. The goal is to demonstrate your ability to engage with current
research, critically analyze literature, and present a coherent, well-structured essay.
Instructions for Students
A. Topic Selection
Choose one advanced imaging technique in any medical imaging modality.
B. Literature Search
Use Google Scholar, PubMed, or the Saudi Digital Library to locate peer-reviewed
journal articles.
-You must read and reference at least 5 scientific articles (preferably from the last 10
years).
-Save your sources and prepare your references in Harvard referencing style.
C. Essay Structure
Your essay should be 1,000 words (+10%) and include the following sections:
1. Introduction (100-150 words)
-Introduce the imaging technique, justify its importance, and state the aim of the
essay.
2. Background/Literature Review (200-300 words)
-Provide context, technical principles, and summarize findings from at least 5 articles.
3. Critical Discussion (400-600 words)
-Critically analyze strengths, limitations, advances, and applications. Compare with
conventional methods.
4. Conclusion (50-100 words)
– Summarize key points, state clinical/research significance, and suggest future
developments.
5. References
-Provide references in Harvard style (minimum 5 peer-reviewed sources).
Writing Style Expectations (MSc Level)
– Avoid purely descriptive writing. Instead, analyze and evaluate.
-Support claims with references.
-Use formal academic language.
– Ensure logical flow between sections.
Marking Rubric (20 Marks Total)
Criteria
Excellent (90-
100%)
Good (80-89%) Satisfactory
Introduction & Aim Clear, engaging Good intro
Poor (zero)
(75-79%)
Adequate intro
Weak/no intro;
aim missing
(2 marks)
intro; strong
with clear aim
but aim
rationale; well-
unclear
defined aim
Literature Review
Comprehensive Covers
Limited
Few/no
(5 marks)
coverage:
required
coverage;
references;
synthesizes 25
articles; some
mostly
superficial
articles;
synthesis
descriptive
integrates
knowledge
Critical Analysis
(6 marks)
Strong critique; Good critique
Mainly
No analysis;
evaluates
with some
descriptive
strengths,
evaluation
limitations,
with limited
critique
purely
descriptive
applications,
Structure &
Coherence
(3 marks)
Academic Writing
& Style (2 marks)
Referencing
(2 marks)
future
directions
Excellent
logical flow;
well-organized
sections
Clear, formal,
concise; MSc-
level analysis
Perfect
Harvard style;
25 peer-
organized;
minor gaps
Mostly clear
Mostly well-
Some structure
but lacks
clarity
Poorly
structured;
incoherent
Adequate but
Informal,
unclear, or
weak
Incorrect or
referencing
errors;
missing
references
and formal
Minor errors;
meets.
simple; some
errors:
Some
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Important Instructions
-This assignment is to be completed individually.
-The deadline for submission is 12 October 2025.
-Any delayed submission will result in a 5% deduction of the total marks.
The total mark for this assignment is 20 marks.
Assignment Brief
You are required to write an academic essay (1,000 words) on an advanced biomedical
imaging technique. The goal is to demonstrate your ability to engage with current
research, critically analyze literature, and present a coherent, well-structured essay.
Instructions for Students
A. Topic Selection
Choose one advanced imaging technique in any medical imaging modality.
B. Literature Search
Use Google Scholar, PubMed, or the Saudi Digital Library to locate peer-reviewed
journal articles.
-You must read and reference at least 5 scientific articles (preferably from the last 10
years).
-Save your sources and prepare your references in Harvard referencing style.
C. Essay Structure
Your essay should be 1,000 words (+10%) and include the following sections:
1. Introduction (100-150 words)
-Introduce the imaging technique, justify its importance, and state the aim of the
essay.
2. Background/Literature Review (200-300 words)
-Provide context, technical principles, and summarize findings from at least 5 articles.
3. Critical Discussion (400-600 words)
-Critically analyze strengths, limitations, advances, and applications. Compare with
conventional methods.
4. Conclusion (50-100 words)
– Summarize key points, state clinical/research significance, and suggest future
developments.
5. References
-Provide references in Harvard style (minimum 5 peer-reviewed sources).
Writing Style Expectations (MSc Level)
– Avoid purely descriptive writing. Instead, analyze and evaluate.
-Support claims with references.
-Use formal academic language.
– Ensure logical flow between sections.
Marking Rubric (20 Marks Total)
Criteria
Excellent (90-
100%)
Good (80-89%) Satisfactory
Introduction & Aim Clear, engaging Good intro
Poor (zero)
(75-79%)
Adequate intro
Weak/no intro;
aim missing
(2 marks)
intro; strong
with clear aim
but aim
rationale; well-
unclear
defined aim
Literature Review
Comprehensive Covers
Limited
Few/no
(5 marks)
coverage:
required
coverage;
references;
synthesizes 25
articles; some
mostly
superficial
articles;
synthesis
descriptive
integrates
knowledge
Critical Analysis
(6 marks)
Strong critique; Good critique
Mainly
No analysis;
evaluates
with some
descriptive
strengths,
evaluation
limitations,
with limited
critique
purely
descriptive
applications,
Structure &
Coherence
(3 marks)
Academic Writing
& Style (2 marks)
Referencing
(2 marks)
future
directions
Excellent
logical flow;
well-organized
sections
Clear, formal,
concise; MSc-
level analysis
Perfect
Harvard style;
25 peer-
organized;
minor gaps
Mostly clear
Mostly well-
Some structure
but lacks
clarity
Poorly
structured;
incoherent
Adequate but
Informal,
unclear, or
weak
Incorrect or
referencing
errors;
missing
references
and formal
Minor errors;
meets.
simple; some
errors:
Some
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
