WORKSHEET
PM/310 v2
Stakeholder Analysis
PM/310 v2
Page 2 of 2
Stakeholder Analysis
Complete Parts 1–3.
Part 1: Stakeholder Matrix
In this table, you will identify stakeholders and their expectations, engagement, actions, and management approach.
Note: The italicized first row is an unrelated example and should be deleted prior to submission. Use this row as a guide and
complete the following:
· In the
Name and Role column,
identify the name of the stakeholder and their role from the scenario.
· In the
Expectation column, briefly
describe the extent of how involved the stakeholder is in the project, in approximately 5–15 words.
· In the
Engagement column, briefly
describe how effectively each stakeholder is currently collaborating on the project and of the stakeholder, in approximately 5–15 words.
· In the
Action column, briefly
recommend ways to improve the engagement of the stakeholder, in approximately 5–15 words.
· In the
Management Approach column,
assign one of the following management strategies to the stakeholder: manage closely, keep informed, keep satisfied, or monitor with minimal effort.
|
Name and Role |
Expectation |
Engagement |
Action Recommendation |
Management Approach (Manage Closely, Keep Informed, Keep Satisfied, or Monitor with Minimal Effort) |
|
Heather, chief financial officer (CFO) |
To sign off on all financial-related decisions |
Moderately engaged, attends meetings, likes being informed |
Continue collaboration, keep her informed, and involve her in key financial decisions |
Keep satisfied |
Part 2: Stakeholder Engagement Matrix
Classify each stakeholder’s power, interest, and current level and desired level of engagement within the project.
Note: The italicized first row is an unrelated example and should be deleted prior to submission. Use this row as a guide and
complete the following:
· In the
Name and Role column,
identify the name and role of the stakeholder.
· In the
Power column, indicate if the stakeholder has high or low power in the project.
· In the
Interest column, indicate if the stakeholder has high or low interest in the project.
· For the remaining columns,
assign each stakeholder a C and D in the column that aligns with their level of engagement. The column options are: unaware, resistant, neutral, supportive, leading.
· Use a “C” to indicate their current level of engagement.
· Use a “D” to indicate their desired level of engagement.
|
Name and Role |
Power (High/Low) |
Interest (High/Low) |
Unaware |
Resistant |
Neutral |
Supportive |
Leading |
|
Heather, CFO |
|
D |
C |
||||
Part 3: Analysis
Write a 350- to 700-word analysis in which you:
· Explain how Angela’s and Enrique’s positions in the power/interest grid (High/Low) affect how much they will be involved in the project. This may include discussing how their positioning affects their motivation, influence, and communication style.
· Examine the stakeholders with low or medium engagement level. Identify ways to improve their level of engagement closer to effective collaboration. This may include examining what impact low engagement can have on the project, especially when it comes to potential misalignment, resistance, or inefficiencies, and examining team dynamics.
· Describe how you would use the stakeholder register to develop the communication plan for collaborating as a team. This may include discussing various engagement techniques, proactive approaches, or examples from personal experiences or case studies.
· Create a communication plan that indicates the frequency of meetings, types of meetings, and level of engagement for each of the stakeholders.
Copyright 2025 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Copyright 2025 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
