Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Stakeholders and Teams [WLOs: 1, 2, 3] [CLOs: 3, 4, 5] Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, Read Chapters 6 and 7 from your course textbook, McLaughlin and Kaluzny’s Continuous Quality Im

Stakeholders and Teams [WLOs: 1, 2, 3] [CLOs: 3, 4, 5]

Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum,

Quality improvement within healthcare organizations involves a system of continuous assessment to find better approaches to quality patient care and service. Health care delivery is accomplished by a team of healthcare professionals. At its core, quality improvement is a team process and effort. In the healthcare ecosystem, various external stakeholders have a stake in the quality of care. Each internal or external stakeholder can make significant contributions to sustain the quality of care and patient safety.

In your initial post,

  • Identify internal stakeholders and their roles in quality improvement.
  • Determine external stakeholders (e.g., payors, regulatory agencies, accrediting entities, etc.) and their roles in quality improvement.
  • Explain the role of patients and their family members in continuous quality improvement.
  • Discuss the importance of a team in quality and risk management.

Your initial post should be a minimum of 250 words. Support your response with at least one scholarly source published within the last 5 years in addition to the course text. For guidance, you can refer to the Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible SourcesLinks to an external site. and APA StyleLinks to an external site. resources.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

On Page 27 of the CMS Quality Strategy Document “Engage Individuals and Communities to become partners in their care” is stated to be an overall objective of this quality initiative. The author(s) of

On Page 27 of the CMS Quality Strategy Document “Engage Individuals and Communities to become partners in their care” is stated to be an overall objective of this quality initiative.  The author(s) of this article then provide four specific outcomes which demonstrate this.  How might the HIM Profession contribute to

On Page 27 of the CMS Quality Strategy Document “Engage Individuals and Communities to become partners in their care” is stated to be an overall objective of this quality initiative. The author(s) of

On Page 27 of the CMS Quality Strategy Document “Engage Individuals and Communities to become partners in their care” is stated to be an overall objective of this quality initiative.  The author(s) of this article then provide four specific outcomes which demonstrate this.  How might the HIM Profession contribute to

Question : Write a Case study on Lynch Syndrome and Ethical Implications in Nursing Practice Content: CaseStudy is summarized with constructs well defined. Evident that student synthesized learning.

Question : Write a Case study on  Lynch Syndrome and Ethical Implications in Nursing Practice Content: CaseStudy is summarized with constructs well defined. Evident that student synthesized learning. Includes introduction, summary and implications for practice.                              

Follow instructions below for case analysis and rubric is links below: Use the same case that you began to analyze in part 1 with assessment of: medical indicationspatient preferencesSegment 2 will co

Follow instructions below for case analysis and rubric is links below: Use the same case that you began to analyze in part 1 with assessment of: medical indications patient preferences Segment 2 will continue your assessment with inclusion of:  3. quality-of-life considerations   4. contextual features Segment 2 will also include an organized problem-solving section that:  defines

Follow instructions below for case analysis and rubric is attached in the files: Use the same case that you began to analyze in part 1 with assessment of: medical indicationspatient preferencesSegment

Follow instructions below for case analysis and rubric is attached in the files: Use the same case that you began to analyze in part 1 with assessment of: medical indications patient preferences Segment 2 will continue your assessment with inclusion of:  3. quality-of-life considerations   4. contextual features Segment 2 will also include an organized problem-solving section

Case: Let’s Cut the Deadweight. Complete the three questions for the case. APA format. case: Let’s Cut the Deadweight Two supervisors, Robert and Janet, were in charge of sections of the building s

Case: Let’s Cut the Deadweight.  Complete the three questions for the case.  APA format. case: Let’s Cut the Deadweight  Two supervisors, Robert and Janet, were in charge of sections of the building services department of Centrat Hespital. They had a fairly close working relationship; they were in a position to

In the article “New Cancer Treatments Lie Hidden Under Mountains of Paperwork”, one of the researchers says that “Data are trapped.” Later in the same article, another researcher states that “About 5

In the article “New Cancer Treatments Lie Hidden Under Mountains of Paperwork”, one of the researchers says that “Data are trapped.”  Later in the same article, another researcher states that “About 50 percent, if not more, of the critical details we need for research are trapped in unstructured documents.” Please

Connections Journals are opportunities for students to identify and analyze some connections among key course components. Over the last 3 weeks of the course, the modules have introduced some key con

Connections Journals are opportunities for students to identify and analyze some connections among key course components.  Over the last 3 weeks of the course, the modules have introduced some key concepts, such as surrogate decision making, advanced care planning, advanced directives and end-of-life decision making. For Connections Journal 2, write