student 1
Step 2: The next morning, Canvas will assign everyone three project first drafts to peer review. Peer reviews are due Thursday, May 30th at 11:59 pm. For each draft you peer review, you must . . .
- Score the assignment rubric (see the video below for instructions on how to show the rubric)
- Leave a 200+ word submission comment. Since drafts will be in various formats and levels of development, there isn’t one way to provide feedback. The big question you should ask yourself as a peer reviewer is, “Would this proposal persuade me to fund the community project?” Here are some other approaches to peer reviewing proposal drafts:
-
- Where are the strongest examples of ethos, pathos and logos? Where are opportunities to amplify these rhetorical appeals?
- Are the community project details clear, realistic and actionable? Does the project fit within the scope of the $1,500 Spark Grant?
- Is the proposal targeted to the Greater Tacoma Community Foundation?
- Does the proposal clearly follow Monroe’s Motivated Sequence? What steps could be developed further?
- Are sources integrated smoothly into the proposal? Are sources cited in the project and in a Works Cited?
- Does the proposal include Creative Commons licensed materials? How do the materials enhance the proposal?
Please watch and read the following resources on how to complete a peer review in Canvas.(peer revies canvas tutoraila video series by Canvas student tutorial on youtube)
-
- What is a Peer Review Assignment?Links to an external site.
- How do I submit a Peer Review Assignment?Links to an external site
Criteria for Success
Because projects will be at different stages of development, I will be flexible with what you submit. However, the more you share, the more feedback you will receive from your peers.
If you’d like, you can add assignment questions to the top or bottom of your document to help guide your peers as they review your work.
