Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Study guide psychopharmacology

See attached document

Study Guide for Benztropine

This week, you will create a Medication Study Guide to share with your peers. This guide is intended to be a useful learning tool for you to use as you prepare for your clinical courses.

Create a 3- to 4-page (excluding visual elements) Medication Study Guide for your assigned psychotropic medication agents that may be utilized by you and colleagues for study. Your medication guide should be in the form of an outline and should include a title page, citations, and references. You should incorporate visual elements, such as concept maps, charts, diagrams, images, color coding, mnemonics, and/or flashcards. Be creative!

Note: Your Medication Study Guide should not be in the format of an APA paper.

Also Note: Your guide should be informed by the FDA-Approved and Evidenced-Based, Clinical Practice Guidelines Research.

Areas of importance that you should address—but are not limited to—include:

· Description of the psychopharmacological medication agent, including brand and generic names, as well as appropriate FDA indication uses

· Any supporting, valid, and reliable research for non-FDA uses

· Drug classification

· The medication mechanism of action

· The medication pharmacokinetics

· The medication pharmacodynamics

· Appropriate dosing, administration route, and any considerations for dosing alterations

· Considerations of use and dosing in specific specialty populations, such as children, adolescents, elderly, pregnant people, those exhibiting suicidal behaviors, etc.

· Definition of half-life, why half-life is important, and the half-life for your assigned medication

· Side effects/adverse reactions potential

· Discuss clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia Note: Be sure to include screening tools that would be utilized.

· Contraindications for use including significant drug to drug interactions

· Overdose considerations

· Diagnostics and labs monitoring comorbidities considerations

· Legal, ethical, and social considerations

· Pertinent patient education considerations

Support your rationale with a minimum of three (3) academic resources.

Please review the grading rubric for criteria evaluated.

NURS_6630_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6630_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication guide includes brand and generic names, FDA uses, classification, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, dosing, administration, considerations for alternate dosing, considerations for prescribing specialty populations, definition of half-life, why half-life important, and what is the half-life for assigned medication, side effects/adverse reaction potentials, contraindications, overdose considerations, diagnostics/labs, and patient education consideration.

50 to >36.0 pts

Excellent

The study guide comprehensively and clearly describes all of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication.

36 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response clearly describes 75% of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication.

24 to >11.0 pts

Fair

The response describes 50% of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication. Noted some inaccuracy in information provided.

11 to >0 pts

Poor

The response describes 25% of the elements of the Assignment directions for the assigned medication. Noted significant inaccuracies in information provided.

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication guide includes clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia with screening tool to be utilized included.

20 to >18.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly identifies clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia. Includes screening tools.

18 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response accurately identifies clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia. Includes screening tools.

15 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies clinical concerns with EPS and Tardive Dyskinesia. Provides inaccurate screening tools.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies clinical concerns with EPS and/or Tardive Dyskinesia, or it is missing. No screening tools.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedication guide includes legal, ethical and social considerations.

10 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the analysis.

7 to >4.0 pts

Good

The response accurately analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the analysis.

4 to >1.0 pts

Fair

The response inaccurately or vaguely analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the analysis.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

The response inaccurately and vaguely analyzes legal, ethical and social considerations for the medication, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the analysis, or it is missing.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe study guide is properly formatted as an outline and includes visual elements for the appropriate audience. The guide is succinct and is 3–4 pages. Three evidence-based, peer-reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources were used.

10 to >7.0 pts

Excellent

The study guide is properly formatted as an outline and includes visual elements for the appropriate audience. The guide is succinct and is 3–4 pages. Three evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

7 to >4.0 pts

Good

The study guide is properly formatted as an outline and includes visual elements for the appropriate audience. The guide is succinct and is 5 pages. Three evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

4 to >1.0 pts

Fair

The study guide is properly formatted as an outline, but no visual elements included for the appropriate audience. The guide is not as succinct and is 6–7 pages. two (2) evidence-based, peer reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

The study guide is not properly formatted as an outline but is a paper. The guide is long, succinct, and is 8+ pages. One or no evidence-based, peer- reviewed scholarly references outside of course resources.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >1.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

1 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100


Previous


Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Social Determinants of Health (SDOH)

1. Identify and briefly define one domain of the SODH 2. Describe how the selected domain impacts health outcomes in your community.  3. Identify two strategies related to the selected domain to improve health outcomes in your community.

Social Determinants of Health

Social determinants of health (SDOH) play an important role in shaping the health and well-being of individuals across the lifespan. It is imperative for healthcare providers to keep an open mind, respect differences, and be aware of implicit personal biases as they assess for social, cultural, economic, educational, and environmental

Week 5

Please see attached Question: Using the ICHS Library find an article on a child developmental disorder and summarize the article. Write a care plan for the child in the discussion? Article: Building Bridges! Children with Autism Spectrum  Disorder and Their Transition from Kindergarten to School – A Scoping Review • 12/31/2023 Purpose:

Nursing ASSIGNMENT

Focused SOAP Note and Patient Case Presetation, Part 1 FOCSED SOAP NOTES AND PATIENT CASE PRESENTATION: Prepared: Review the  Kaltura button from the  Classroom Support Center (accessed via the  Help button) for help creating your self-recorded Kaltura video. · Select an  adult patient that you examined during the last 4 weeks who presented with a disorder 

Nursing ASSIGNMENT

STUDY GUIDE FORUM Assigned ADHD Prepare: Your Instructor will assign you to a specific neurodevelopmental disorder from the  DSM-5-TR . Research your assigned disorder using the Walden Library. Then, develop an organizational scheme for the important information about the disorder. Create a study guide for your assigned disorder. Your study guide

Assessment 3

See attached for instructions After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis (DVT) in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research question and research it. Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time

week 2 case

Case 2 Chief Complaint (CC)  A 45-year-old female presents with a complaint of an itchy red rash on her arms and legs for about two weeks. Subjective She has been going on a daily basis to the local YMCA with children for Summer camp.  VS (T) 98.3°F; (RR) 18; (HR)

Marshall reading found in attached

find attached To prepare: · Review the Marshall et. al. (2017) Reading Excerpt linked above. Prompt: What challenges to completion do you anticipate you will encounter in your doctoral program? What strategies for successful completion do you anticipate will be the most useful for you, and how will you work

WEEK 2 HEALTH

What are the Pros and Cons to telehealth? How will you approach and perform a telehealth assessment? What are the limits to telehealth? What is the difference between the provider’s need for a successful telehealth visit versus the Patient’s perspective?

unit 10 discussion

see attached Topic: Reflection In this course many assignments were completed that pertain to the following course objectives. As you reflect back on these objectives, what assignment do you feel was most beneficial to your learning concepts related to your role as a PMHNP and how do you feel this assignment

Nursing Homework Promotion Week 2

 Please read the study I’ve attached and answer the reflective questions.   MSN 5550 Health Promotion: Prevention of Disease Case Study Module 4 Instructions: Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions. Please provide rationales for your answers. Make sure to provide a citation for your answers. Must follow

NUR 506

Agency Synopsis Identify regulatory agencies that regulate health and the health care system within the US, create a table listing your 5 regulatory agencies and address the following:
 1. Describe the agency, level of regulatory authority (local, state, federal), scope of regulatory authority, and role within the US healthcare system.

NUR 504 506

NUR 506 Discussion 1 Nursing & Health-Care-Policy Analyze the history, structure, and process of health-care-policy and politics in nursing and the health care delivery systems in the United States. Submission Instructions: • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support

MT week 9 soap

47year oldBlackFemaleChronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 1 SOAP Note Assignment Instructions Consider constructing a Word document ‘SOAP note template’ and use it to assemble your note. By doing this you can use the template for efficiently constructing your SOAP notes such that you will be able to copy-and-paste for your

611 discussion 2

Discussion 2 What is the importance of a literature review and what should you avoid when conducting a literature review? Submission Instructions: · Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. 

324Topic 2 DQ 2

If health care practitioners cannot communicate to the patients in their language, how important is it to find a translator? Whose problem is it, the health care provider’s or the patient’s? Why?