Study Plan

NRNP_6675_Week2_Assignment2_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRevise your study plan, summarizing your current strengths and opportunities for improvement. Uploads previous NRNP 6665 study plan to demonstrate revisions.

25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of revision for both current strengths and opportunities for improvement. Uploads NRNP 6665 study plan.

22 to >19.0 ptsGood 80%–89%The response provides an accurate summary of revision for both current strengths and opportunities for improvement. Uploads NRNP 6665 study plan.

19 to >17.0 ptsFair 70%–79%The response provides a somewhat vague and/or inaccurate summary of revision for both current strengths and opportunities for improvement. Missing upload of NRNP 6665 student plan.

17 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%A summary of revision for both the current strengths and opportunities for improvement are incomplete or missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop 3-4 new SMART goals for this quarter and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.

30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%The response provides 3-4 new clear and appropriate SMART goals for the study plan, including tasks to complete to accomplish each goal. A clear timeline is provided for the study plan as well as a description of how progress toward goal completion will be measured.

26 to >23.0 ptsGood 80%–89%The response provides 3-4 new appropriate SMART goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Appropriate tasks, timeline, and description of how progress will be measured are provided.

23 to >20.0 ptsFair 70%–79%The response provides 3-4 somewhat vague or general goals for the study plan. Tasks, timeline, and description of how progress toward goals will be measured are vague or somewhat inappropriate.

20 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%The response provides 3-4 unclear or inappropriate goals for the study plan, or goals are missing. Tasks, timeline, and a description for how progress will be measured are incomplete or missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.

30 to >26.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%The response provides a clear description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are tailored to individual need.

26 to >23.0 ptsGood 80%–89%The response provides a description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are somewhat tailored to individual need.

23 to >20.0 ptsFair 70%–79%The response provides a description of general resources that are not tailored to individual need.

20 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%The response provides a description of inappropriate resources to support the study plan, or the description of resources is vague or missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89%Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79%Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time…. Purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion were not provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89%Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79%Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for parenthetical/in-text citations and reference list.

5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent 90%–100%Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 ptsGood 80%–89%Contains 1-2 APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair 70%–79%Contains 3-4 APA format errors

3 to >0 ptsPoor 0%–69%Contains five or more APA format errors

5 pts