Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Summary

Summarize this in 2 paragraphs no more than 3


Due 10/1/2024

Improving Reading Achievement Through Response to Intervention: Analyzing NAEP Data for Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Students

Introduction

Reading comprehension plays an essential role in determining a student’s overall academic success, particularly for those from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. For many students living in low-income households, the challenges associated with mastering literacy skills are compounded by factors beyond the classroom, such as limited access to books, fewer educational resources at home, and less exposure to enriching experiences that foster language development (Cutuli et al., 2013). These obstacles contribute to ongoing disparities in reading achievement, often placing lower-income students at greater risk of underperforming compared to their peers.

This issue is further exacerbated by the fact that students from underprivileged backgrounds frequently attend schools that are underfunded and understaffed, leaving educators with fewer resources to address the specific needs of struggling readers. Research has consistently shown that interventions tailored to develop core literacy skills — particularly in reading comprehension, fluency, and vocabulary — are essential in helping these students succeed (Dietrichson et al., 2021). Without these targeted supports, many disadvantaged students continue to lag behind, widening the achievement gap that persists throughout their academic careers.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) provides critical data for understanding the extent of these challenges. Specifically, the Grade 4 reading scores for students eligible for the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) offer a revealing look into how socioeconomic status impacts literacy development. Students who qualify for NSLP, often from lower-income families, tend to score significantly lower in reading achievement than their peers. This paper will delve into NAEP data to examine the achievement gaps that exist and explore the potential for improving reading outcomes through targeted, multi-tiered interventions based on the Response to Intervention (RTI) framework. By focusing on students’ specific needs through Tier 2 and Tier 3 interventions, the goal is to enhance their reading proficiency and address broader inequities in educational outcomes.

Problem Statement

This project focuses on the reading achievement of Grade 4 students as reported in the 2022 NAEP assessment. The dataset highlights the performance of students who are socioeconomically disadvantaged, as indicated by their eligibility for the NSLP. Specifically, 52% of students eligible for NSLP scored below the “Basic” reading proficiency level, whereas only 3% scored at the “Advanced” level (see Table 1). These results are particularly alarming when compared to their peers who are not eligible for the NSLP, who performed significantly better.

The purpose of this analysis is to identify patterns in reading achievement gaps and propose Tier 2 and Tier 3 interventions based on the RTI framework. The goal is to address the specific needs of these low-performing students and improve their reading comprehension, thereby helping them close the achievement gap with their higher-income peers.To better understand the relationship between socio-economic status and reading achievement, a regression analysis was conducted using NSLP eligibility as the independent variable (see Appendix A for full results). The model shows a significant relationship between NSLP eligibility and reading scores, with students not eligible for NSLP scoring higher than their low-income peers. The model’s R-squared value indicates that 13% of the variance in reading scores can be explained by NSLP eligibility

Table 1: NAEP Reading Scores (2022) for NSLP-Eligible and Non-Eligible Students

Year

Jurisdiction

National School Lunch Program eligibility, 3 categories

below Basic

at or above Basic

at or above Proficient

at Advanced

10th percentile

25th percentile

50th percentile

75th percentile

90th percentile

2022

National

Eligible

52

48

19

3

149

177

206

231

251

2022

National

Not eligible

24

76

46

14

182

210

235

256

274

2022

National

Information not available

22

78

46

14

188

211

235

256

274

U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2022).
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2022 reading assessment.

Rationale for Selection

The selection of this dataset and research problem stems from the significant achievement gaps between low-income and higher-income students in reading proficiency. According to the data, over half of the students eligible for the NSLP fall below basic reading standards. These students struggle with fundamental reading skills, and the gap between their performance and that of their higher-income peers only widens as they progress through school.

This gap calls for immediate and targeted intervention, specifically through the RTI framework. As a multi-tiered approach, RTI offers research-based interventions that can be tailored to meet the diverse needs of struggling students (Fuchs & Fuchs, 2017). This paper will focus on designing Tier 2 and Tier 3 interventions that can help these students achieve proficiency in reading.

Data Analysis

The NAEP dataset offers valuable insights into the performance of socioeconomically disadvantaged students in reading. The mean reading score for students eligible for the NSLP is 206, while their non-eligible peers score a mean of 235 at the 50th percentile. The wide performance gap between these two groups is consistent across all percentiles, particularly at the 90th percentile, where eligible students score 254 compared to 274 for non-eligible students.

Measures of Central Tendency


Mean: The average score for eligible students is significantly lower than that of non-eligible students, indicating a widespread issue among low-income students.


Median: The median reading score for eligible students shows a similar trend of underperformance, highlighting the need for targeted support.


Range: The score range between the 10th and 90th percentiles is broader for eligible students, reflecting both a large number of struggling readers and a small number of high achievers.

Patterns and Trends

The most apparent trend in this dataset is the persistent underachievement of low-income students compared to their higher-income peers. At the 10th percentile, the gap is relatively narrow (149 vs. 182), but by the 90th percentile, the gap widens significantly (254 vs. 274). This suggests that even high-performing low-income students are not reaching the same levels of achievement as their non-eligible peers.

Additionally, the high percentage of students scoring below basic reading proficiency is concerning. With over half of NSLP-eligible students in this category, the data suggests that many of these students lack foundational reading skills, making it difficult for them to catch up without targeted interventions.

Goals and Objectives

The goal of this project is to improve reading proficiency among NSLP-eligible students through the implementation of RTI-based interventions. The following objectives are designed to achieve this goal:


Objective 1: When presented with reading passages at their instructional level, students will use context clues to define unfamiliar words with 80% accuracy, as measured by reading comprehension assessments.


Objective 2: Students will improve their reading fluency by participating in small-group interventions, increasing their reading speed and accuracy by 20% over the course of a semester.


Objective 3: Through the use of questioning strategies, students will demonstrate an 80% improvement in comprehension of informational texts, as measured by oral and written assessments.

Interventions and Action Plan

Tier 2 Interventions: Small Group Instruction

Tier 2 interventions will focus on students scoring between the 25th and 50th percentiles, who demonstrate moderate difficulty in reading but have the potential to improve with targeted instruction. These students will be grouped into small cohorts and will receive additional reading instruction three times a week. Each session will last 30 minutes and will focus on comprehension strategies, vocabulary building, and reading fluency.

Tier 3 Interventions: Individualized Instruction

Tier 3 interventions are designed for students scoring below the 25th percentile, who exhibit significant difficulties in reading. These students will receive one-on-one instruction four times a week, focusing on foundational reading skills such as phonics, decoding, and vocabulary development. Instruction will be personalized to meet each student’s specific needs, and progress will be closely monitored through bi-weekly assessments.

Summary and Discussion

The analysis of the 2022 NAEP reading data allowed us  to understand a disparity that persists in the educational attainment of students whose families are poor enough to qualify for the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and for their wealthier counterparts as well. More than 50% of the students participating in NSLP were below basic reading proficiency that reflect the most foundational skills  expected to be obtained by all learners. Our paper emphasizes the need of appropriate multi-level interventions through RTI with respect to the nature of these literacy deficits.

The result of the regression analysis and measures of central tendency further establishes the assumption about every student with NSLP eligibility seating in the lower reading composite score which led to the conclusion that indeed socioeconomic status still determines the level of academic achievement reached. By developing and monitoring the implementation of Tiers 2 and 3 interventions that incorporate small-group and one-on-one instruction as a means of embedding focused strategies to help students with reading difficulties address particular reading skills, teachers can help students with particular reading weaknesses. These interventions are in tune with research that supports the use of varied instruction in addressing the reading problems of children from poor families (Fuchs & Fuchs, 2017; Dietrichson et al., 2021).

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Education Homework

Hello. Is there anyone that can assist me with my homework.  I will have everything needed in the upload below. Chapter 19: The Hajj Book  Creator Assignment :  Religious Pilgrimage to Makkah Research the religious pilgrimage taken by Muslims to Makkah (Mecca) Use book creator (I’ll give you the code) to make

Education Homework

Hello.  Is there anyone that can assist me with my homework.  I will have everything that is needed in the upload below.

Education homework

TASK 1 : CREATE ” MY CONTRIBTUION CRITIQUE” BASED OF THIS RUBRIC: MUST BE AT LEAST A PAGE AND HALF OF WHAT YOU WOULD KEEP, DELETE OR CHANGE, WHAT WOULD YOU CHANGE, KEEP , DELTE AND WHY ?  Valagussa, G., Purpura, G., Balatti, V., Trentin, L., Signori, A., & Grossi,

Education edu 565 week 3 assignment

refer to attached document  Overview This activity sets the stage for the Week 4 assignment. Based on the media, Benefits of a Learning Organization, you will complete a brief needs assessment for a company. This activity emphasizes the characteristics and benefits of a learning organization, reminds you of the critical

Help Now

Need Help ASAP Take the sample outline and transfer everything to make sure its done right Developing Critical Thinking through Literacy Strategies Jermey Banks [Insert Course Title] [Insert Instructor Name] October 2025 Introduction Literacy development is a cornerstone of academic success, and fostering critical thinking through reading allows students to

j jordan

please see attachment any use of AI will result in automatic 0 Please select a creative idea for your capstone and submit a 3-5 page proposal for preliminary topic approval by your instructor.  Please note that the list of suggested topics in the “Resources” folder are just that – suggestions

anna powerpoint

  Select  a topic impacting family systems in which you will become an expert and  teach to your classmates.  A minimum of 3 references are to be included  of which 2 should be peer reviewed research articles to support your  information.  In addition, you are to include a minimum of

thomas week 4

please see attachment any use of AI will result in automatic 0 Diverse learners often require diverse approaches to literacy. Educators can meet their needs by creating a toolbox of strategies for engaging them in literacy. In this assignment, you will create a strategy chart evaluating literacy strategies as they

thomas week 4

  Literature relies on recurring themes which are universal to  diverse populations, including love, life, death, good versus evil,  coming of age, and many more. Think about a favorite book and consider  its use with diverse learners. Use the questions to guide an original response: How would you make this

book review dee

Please see attachment. Any use of AI will result in an automatic 0 Each student is required to read Unmasking Administrative Evil by Danny Balfour, Guy Adams, and Ashley Nickels and write a 6-8-page (typewritten, double-spaced, 12-point font – not including the title page, references, abstract and appendices) review of

Education Unit 2 EDU 755 Reading Assignments/Discussion 1

Question Unit 2: Discussion Question  Discussion Question: Post your initial response to the discussion forum by Wednesday 11:59 p.m. and respond to the discussion of others by Saturday 11:59 p.m. Discussion Question (10 points) In response to the quote in the Terrell & Lindsey text “Remember, you don’t fear people

Module 5

Instructions Module 5 Comprehension Small Task #3 Checklist   In this module, you will have 3 tasks:  Complete  two IRIS professional development modules on comprehension and  complete a reflection.   To receive full credit for the IRIS modules, your certificates must include: Pre-test and post test score on the certificate. Post-test

Education I need help with homework

I need help with homework Questioning Strategies for a Variety of Purposes is our topic of discussion this week.   You will examine digital tools that support students’ development of higher-order questioning skills, stimulate debate, and promote inquiry and critical thinking.   You will create a variety of questions that activate prior knowledge,

Solution

While the problems appear to be endless with funding and our schools, that doesn’t mean that they don’t deserve creative problem solving. While some solutions require more creativity than others, we must be constantly solutioning to ensure that students’ educational needs are met. Specific Assignment Details For this deliverable you

readingg

IMG_8960.jpg IMG_8961.jpg IMG_8962.jpg IMG_8963.jpg IMG_8964.jpg IMG_8965.jpg IMG_8966.jpg IMG_8967.jpg

replyyyy now

Reply to peers posts in 5-7 sentences each Ash post- In my experience working in special education, I’ve seen how important family advocacy can be during the IEP process. Some families initially struggle to get the supports their child needs because they aren’t sure how to navigate the system or

Discussion Question 1

This assignment is worth 100 points so each question is worth 25 points.  Make sure you address all parts of each question! Textbook (Red Shelf):  Literacy in the Early Grades  1. Do you remember your kindergarten and first-grade classroom? Can you remember a moment when you first read to someone? Do

quay week7

any use of AI will result in automatic 0 You have just been hired as the hypothetical Facility Manager at “American Military/Public University Arena” in Charles Town, West Virginia. The arena seats 65,000 and is used as a multipurpose facility to host events in college and professional basketball, football, and