Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Tesla Case Study

Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Sunday of Unit 2

Points: 100

Overview:

In this assignment, you need to review the Tesla, Inc. case study. The case study

describes the rise of Tesla Motors, an electric vehicle company founded in 2004 by

electric inventor Martin Eberhard and South African innovator, Elon Musk. The case

details the motivation of the two men, their personalities, and the conflicts they went

through to develop the company. It also provides an overview of the challenges and

opportunities of competing in the electric vehicle space; discusses Tesla’s strategies for

manufacturing, marketing, and distributing the cars; and points to key questions about

Tesla’s future.

Instructions:

Review the Tesla Case Study. Also, feel free to utilize information from the Tesla videos

found in Reading and Resources in this unit.

Using Porter’s Five Forces model:

• Describe in detail the challenges and opportunities of competing in the electric

vehicle industry.

o You will need to create a section for each of the five forces when

answering the question in detail.

• Finally, describe Tesla’s strengths and weaknesses.

Requirements:

• Submit a two-three page Word document covering the elements of the

assignment.

• Develop a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. Use paragraph format and

transitions.

• Focus on the quality of writing and content.

• Use APA format with a title page, in-text citations, and references. Abstract not

required. The title page, reference page, and appendices are excluded in page

length requirement.

BUS411 – Business Policy
Seminar

Tesla, Inc. – Case Study 15

• Research and cite at least two credible sources in APA format.

Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before

you write and again after you write.

Evaluation Rubric for Tesla, Inc. Case Study Assignment

CRITERIA Deficient Needs
Improvement

Proficient Exemplary

0-11 points 12-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points

Introduction Unclear or
incomplete.

Introduction
with a partially
developed
thesis.

Introduction
with a mostly
developed
thesis.

Clear, well-
developed,
introduction
and thesis.

0-17 points 18-23 points 24-26 points 27-30 points

Supporting
Evidence/
Analysis

Lacks specific,
credible, and
relevant
support.
Development
of
position/argum
ent is
inadequate or
missing.

Not adequately
supported with
a limited
spectrum of
specific,
credible, and
relevant
evidence.
Development
of
position/argum
ent is
somewhat
thoughtful and
persuasive but
lacks detail.

Adequately
supported with
a limited
spectrum of
specific,
credible, and
relevant
evidence.
Development
of
position/argum
ent is
thoughtful and
persuasive but
lacks some
detail.

Well-supported
with a broad
spectrum of
specific,
credible, and
relevant
evidence.
Position/argum
ent is well-
developed,
very thoughtful,
and
persuasive.

0-11 points 12-15 points 16-17 points 18-20 points

Conclusion No conclusion
included.

Some attempt
at a
conclusion, but
it is not well
written.

Good attempt
at a
conclusion, but
more
development
needed.

Well written
and fully
developed
conclusion.

0-8 points 9-11 points 12-13 points 14-15 points

Clear and
Professional
Writing

Writing is
frequently
difficult to
understand
because of
several errors
in grammar,
punctuation,

Writing is
somewhat
difficult to
understand
with errors in
punctuation,
spelling, and
grammar.

Writing is easy
to understand
despite minor
errors in
punctuation,
spelling, and
grammar.
Appropriate

Writing is free
of almost all
punctuation,
spelling, and
grammar
errors.
Appropriate
word choice is

and spelling.
Word choice
is sometimes
inappropriate
for an
academic
setting.
Sentence
structure is
unclear.

Appropriate
word choice is
somewhat
used for an
academic
setting.
Sentence
structure is
somewhat
clear.

word choice is
used for an
academic
setting.
Sentence
structure is
mostly clear.

used for an
academic
setting.
Sentence
structure is
clear.

0-8 points 9-11 points 12-13 points 14-15 points

APA
Formatting
and
References

Paper has no
APA
formatting, or
paper has an
APA cover, but
no references
or in-text
citations.
No academic
references
present or
reference
formatting has
significant
errors.

Paper lacks
multiple
elements of
APA (cover,
references, or
in-text
citations).
One academic
reference
present but
errors in
formatting.

Paper lacks
one element of
APA (cover,
references, or
in-text
citations).
Two academic
references
present but
may have a
few errors in
formatting.

Paper has all
elements of
APA formatting
(cover,
references,
and in-text
citations).
Two or more
academic
references are
present and
formatted
properly.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Human Resources Management

Employee and Labor Relations  The purpose of this assignment is to strengthen your research skills, enhance your presentation skills, and expand your knowledge. You will need to research material beyond the class readings to investigate labor/employee relations at a specific organization. You will report your findings to the class in

In need of PowerPoint

Please finalize your Tik Tok PowerPoint to present with no less than 5 slides. Information to include but not limited to: -Tik Tok user data -How we can utilize to reach younger voters -Best days to post  -Time to post i have already started a little bit on there  -How

SLP3

Module 3 – SLP Employee Benefits: Continued You have been asked to give a 10-minute presentation to a college’s undergraduate HRM class. You have decided to use the following case scenario to spearhead the discussion. . An Attractive Benefits Package? Susan greeted Beutan, her next interview applicant. Beutan had an

Case 3

Module 3 – Case Employee Benefits: Continued Assignment Overview Today’s HR professionals are expected to measure the success or failure of HR practices based on the achievement of organizational outcomes. Brand identity, bottom-line profitability, employee job satisfaction, and increased management focus are all outcomes that can be achieved in part

discussion 3 MR

Discussion 3 nitial Post—Module 3 Watch the following advertisement from HMP Finance: Why Generous Paid Time Off Policies Pay For Employers (HMP Finance, 2017) As we see from the video, HMP Finance recommends employers to have generous paid-time-off policies. · If you were in charge of a business, what paid-time-off

Research based on outline

This is based on the outline I posted recently. Can you please complete this based on the outline? Individual Research Paper: Final Assignment Instructions Overview: Complete an individual research paper over three separate assignments. Instructions: Using your research and outline, you will complete a 5-6 page research paper complying with the formatting

Human Resource Management Assignment 5

Please complete the following questions. Be sure to cite all your sources, even if you only use the textbook. Do individuals making staffing decisions have an ethical responsibility to know measurement issues? Why or why not? Describe the structured interview. What are the characteristics of structured interviews that improve on

SWOT business policy

Due Date: 11:59 pm EST Sunday of Unit 1 Points: 100 Overview: A SWOT Analysis is used to evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats for a business. This analysis can be used to help in the creation of strategic plans for the future. You will perform a SWOT Analysis

Measurement

Do individuals making staffing decisions have an ethical responsibility to know measurement issues? Why or why not?

evaluation1

Name of person/ project that you are providing feedback for: _________ 1. Briefly describe the training and evaluation  2. Comment generally on what you like about your colleagues training module and if you think their evaluation can capture efficacy in the training. (If not, what could strengthen their evaluation/evaluation process)?

540 evaluation

Name of person/ project that you are providing feedback for: _________ 1. Briefly describe the training and evaluation  2. Comment generally on what you like about your colleagues training module and if you think their evaluation can capture efficacy in the training. (If not, what could strengthen their evaluation/evaluation process)?

Outline

I have instructions attached for an outline. HR Technology: Digital HR Tools – HR Information Systems INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH PAPER: OUTLINE AND REFERENCES ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS: You will complete a full-sentence outline for the second part of this paper. The outline must include: 1. Thesis Statement: Clearly state the main argument

Perusal mod 6

Perusal Assignment (I attached the textbook and this is coming from chapter 10 ( MIXED METHOD PROCEDURES) 1. Look in paragraph 1 under Mixed Methods Research in Perspective in the text, and explain the paragraph, that starts with “ mixed method research as a distinct methodology originating around the 1980’s

Ogl 554 final

2 Learning Design Check-in for EmpowerEd The Google Classroom training module will be delivered in person at a community center over four hours, with a catered lunch to encourage teamwork. This medium shows that 65% of teachers choose hands-on learning (EmpowerEd, 2025). Educators will receive a PDF handbook before the

Case 2

Module 2 – Case Employee Benefits Assignment Overview Please read the following for a review of employee benefits: Doyle, A. (2019).  Types of employee benefits and perks . Retrieved from  (Be sure to click on the links within this source to gain depth about specific benefits.) Glassdoor Team. (2018).  11

SLP 2

Module 2 – Case Employee Benefits Assignment Overview Please read the following for a review of employee benefits: Doyle, A. (2019).  Types of employee benefits and perks . Retrieved from  (Be sure to click on the links within this source to gain depth about specific benefits.) Glassdoor Team. (2018).  11

HR 10

Promote from Within or External Hire MDN Inc. is considering two employees for the job of senior manager. An internal candidate, Julie, has been with MDN for 12 years and received very good performance evaluations. The other candidate, Raoul, works for a competitor, and has valuable experience in the product