The “Marihuana” tax act, along with the Harrison Narcotics Act, were not born from careful examination of an accumulation of evidence. Indeed, the strong opinions of reformists, and a cabal of powerful “anti-druggist” physicians and state and federal legislators were the primary catalysts for complete prohibition. Using context and examples from the readings, explain why this was problematic, and more broadly, why basing any policy solely on public opinion is problematic.
I am in need of structuring a brief for the Court of Appeals that must have exhibits. The brief is about continuus retaliation after a wrongful termination. I had a helper but my request to see the wo
I am in need of structuring a brief for the Court of Appeals that must have exhibits. The brief is about continuus retaliation after a wrongful termination. I had a helper but my request to see the work many times were gnored. I can see if he is willing to