See Attached
Purpose
· Apply knowledge of funding sources and financial data from the organization’s Form 990 to create a budget.
· Develop a narrative explanation of the budget.
· Address reporting and board oversight responsibilities, KPIs, and sustainability.
Task
You will research your nonprofit’s financial data the Wounded Warrior Project (WWP), to develop a budget in Excel format and include a Word document with a narrative explanation of the budget and reporting/board oversight sections. You may use this
template
or create your own.
Include the following items:
1.
Budget Development:
· Utilizing the funding sources identified in Unit 2 and financial data from the organization’s Form 990, create a comprehensive budget for the nonprofit organization.
· Use Excel to organize and present the budget data effectively.
· Include income/funding sources, direct and indirect costs, and any other relevant financial considerations.
2.
Narrative Explanation:
· Provide a narrative explanation of the budget, detailing the rationale behind revenue projections, expense allocations, and any assumptions made.
· Explain how the budget aligns with the organization’s mission, goals, and strategic priorities.
· Make recommendations for new funding sources to ensure growth and sustainability.
3.
Reporting and Board Oversight:
· Address reporting requirements for nonprofit organizations, including any specific financial reporting obligations.
· Discuss the role of the board of directors in overseeing the budgeting process and ensuring financial accountability. Provide an assessment of your organization’s board with any recommendations for improvement.
· Identify key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics that the board currently monitors. Make recommendations for KPIs the board should monitor to assess the organization’s financial health and sustainability.
Presentation Format:
· Present the budget in Excel format, clearly labeling income, expenses, and any other relevant categories.
· Include a separate Word document for the narrative explanation of the budget, and reporting/board oversight. Include a reference list.
· Include references to the course material and other high-quality resources to support your analysis. Ensure any item on your reference list has a matching in-text citation.
Unit 2 Reference:
Nonprofit Identity, Funding, and Competitive Analysis
This discussion on the Wounded Warrior Project (WWP) as a nationally recognized nonprofit dedicated to serving veterans wounded, injured, or made ill during military service after September 11, 2001. Its mission is to honor and empower wounded warriors. WWP’s vision is to foster the most successful, well-adjusted generation of wounded service members in U.S. history.
The organization’s core values include service, integrity, collaboration, empowerment, and accountability. These values are reflected in WWP’s holistic approach to veteran support, which spans mental health services, physical wellness, career counseling, benefits assistance, and long-term advocacy efforts.
Funding Sources and Financial Sustainability
WWP relies on a diversified funding model that aligns closely with its mission and strategic objectives. Primary funding sources include:
• Individual donations, which represent a significant portion of WWP’s revenue and reflect strong public trust and brand recognition.
• Corporate partnerships, including support from companies such as Lockheed Martin and USAA, which align with military and veteran-focused initiatives.
• Foundation grants, particularly from philanthropic organizations dedicated to veterans’ services, mental health, and workforce reintegration.
• Cause-related marketing campaigns and events, which generate revenue while increasing awareness of veteran-related issues.
This diversified funding structure enhances financial sustainability while allowing WWP to scale programs nationally without over-dependence on government funding.
Analysis of Form 990 and Organizational Transparency
WWP’s Form 990, publicly available through Candid (GuideStar), demonstrates a strong emphasis on transparency and financial accountability. The organization reports substantial annual revenues, with a majority allocated to program services, including mental health programs, physical rehabilitation, career transition services, and long-term warrior support initiatives.
Governance details outlined in the u indicate an independent board of directors, formal conflict-of-interest policies, and executive compensation review processes consistent with nonprofit best practices. Additional insights from WWP’s annual impact reports and secondary sources highlight an increased focus on outcomes measurement and continuous improvement following earlier public scrutiny, reinforcing organizational learning and accountability.
Competitor Analysis: Disabled American Veterans (DAV)
A key competitor in the veterans’ services nonprofit space is Disabled American Veterans (DAV). DAV’s mission emphasizes empowering veterans to lead high-quality lives with respect and dignity through benefits advocacy, claims assistance, and legislative engagement.
While both organizations serve disabled veterans, WWP differentiates itself through a broader, lifestyle-oriented and holistic service model, whereas DAV focuses more heavily on claims representation, transportation services, and policy advocacy. An examination of DAV’s Form 990 shows a more advocacy-centric allocation of resources, with comparatively fewer wellness and family-support programs than WWP.
Alignment, Distinctions, and Strategic Positioning
WWP’s mission, vision, and values align strongly with its funding sources, particularly individual donors and corporate partners invested in veteran well-being and post-service success. As discussed in Emily Barman’s work on nonprofit accountability, mission alignment with funding streams is critical to maintaining legitimacy and donor confidence. WWP demonstrates this alignment by reinvesting donor contributions directly into warrior-centered programs rather than allowing financial incentives to distort organizational purpose.
What sets WWP apart from competitors such as DAV is its comprehensive, long-term support model, strong national brand recognition, and emphasis on measurable outcomes related to mental health, employment, and quality of life. These distinctions position WWP as a leading organization in the veteran-support nonprofit sector.
References:
Barman, E. (2007). What is the bottom line for nonprofit organizations? Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 18(2), 101–117.
Disabled American Veterans. (2023). Form 990. Candid (GuideStar).
Wounded Warrior Project. (2023). Annual impact report.
Wounded Warrior Project. (2023). Form 990. Candid (GuideStar).
Filter
