Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

WEEK 5

Please see attached for instruction

To Prepare

· By Day 1, your instructor will assign a mood or anxiety disorder diagnosis for you to use for this Assignment.

· Research signs and symptoms for your diagnosis, pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological treatments, and appropriate community resources and referrals.

Assigned diagnosis is Autism spectrum disorder

The Assignment

In a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience, explain signs and symptoms for your diagnosis, pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological treatments, and appropriate community resources and referrals.
Although you are not required to respond to colleagues, collegial discussion is welcome. 

Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week5_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week5_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience: • Explain signs and symptoms for the assigned diagnosis in children and adolescents.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and concisely explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for children and adolescents with the diagnosis.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and concisely explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and concisely explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Can you help by tonight ?

PHIL347 Course Project: Topic Selection 1. My argument will provide reasons related to the following question: ___________________________  2. ______My argument will support this claim as true; my answer to the question is “yes.”   ______My argument will not support this claim and will oppose this claim as false; my answer to

Qualitative & Quantitative Research Design

Critically appraise a qualitative and quantitative research design – Please select two research articles (qualitative and quantitative) and critically appraise both of them.    Once you chose your research articles, answer the following questions for both studies:  1. Is the evidence from a known, reputable source? 2. Has the evidence

Describing, Diagnosing, & Treatment of Skin, Eye, & Ear Disorders

Describe dermatitis, diagnostic criteria, and treatment modalities Describe the drug therapy for Conjunctivitis and Otitis Media  Discuss Herpes Virus infections, patient presentation, and treatment Describe the most common primary bacterial skin infections and the treatment of choice. 

Nursing

Post a cohesive response to the following: What are the key challenges that healthcare practitioners encounter when balancing patient care with the requirement for stringent data protection? How can healthcare organizations ensure patient confidentiality while effectively leveraging digital tools to enhance care delivery?

help with home work

Nurs 506 unit 2 assignment Canada is the first country to permit nurse practitioners to provide euthanasia. Assisted dying legislation has been introduced in Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand health systems. From the perspectives of your nursing practice specialization (nurse executive leader, nurse practitioner, and nurse educator), propose

help with home work

NU507-1: Examine U.S. health care policy structures and the role of the nursing leader as a change agent at the public policy table. Directions You will choose one federal-level healthcare policy issue that interests you. As a change agent, using “X” a microblogging platform, you will write to one of your

Can help by tomorrow night ?

In this creative writing assignment, you will take on the role of an advocate and analyze how federal and state powers interact in addressing public, health, and environmental issues. Utilize the First Amendment, your state constitution, and any other documents needed. Select a topic from the list below and create a

Baby Fae Discussion

  Identify and list two ethical or moral issues you observed in this case. Review the ethical codes/tenants of the stakeholders (see attached documents below). You will be assigned to take the perspective of one stakeholder group (RESEARCHERS) using the belmont report and decide how they would respond to one

Literature Evaluation

In collaboration with the approved clinical preceptor, students will identify a specific evidence-based topic for the capstone project change proposal. Students should consider the clinical environment in which they are currently employed or have recently worked. The capstone project topic can be a clinical practice problem, an organizational issue, a

Can you complete this by tomorrow night ?

Week 2 Guided Learning Activity: Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Directions: Type the letter answer into Canvas. You may also include the whole line. The letter comes before the line or sentence Example: [A] Paris is the biggest city in France. [B] It is a major cultural center with many famous

Mental health soap mitz

Mental health soap mitz Initial Psychiatric Interview/SOAP Note Template There are different ways in which to complete a Psychiatric SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) Note. This is a template that is meant to guide you as you continue to develop your style of SOAP in the psychiatric practice setting.

RH soap note

RH soap note Initial Psychiatric Interview/SOAP Note Template There are different ways in which to complete a Psychiatric SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) Note. This is a template that is meant to guide you as you continue to develop your style of SOAP in the psychiatric practice setting. Criteria

Nursing Homework

Week 3 PICOT Worksheet Question Assignment Preparing the Assignment Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. While many different models for evidence-based practice (EBP) exist, a core methodology is shared within each. Central to EBP models is the review

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders The  DSM-5-TR is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with

Nursing Nursing Homework

Nursing Homework help  MUST BE ORIGINAL WORK ONLY PRIMARY POST: 1. Create a PICO question using proper PICO formatting. i. Formulate an EBP question using the PICO format on your selected practice issue (you can assess any intervention other than CHG bathing). 2. Locate one journal article relevant to your

Home work

Competency Analyze the incidence, distribution, and control of emerging healthcare concerns in global populations. Student Success Criteria View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “Grading rubric” in the right menu.  Scenario You are preparing to speak at a global health conference about a disease affecting a global

Nursing Wk8 assignment conc

Proposed mechanism of action Baseline assessment, laboratory considerations, and frequency of ongoing labs and assessments Note: Discuss the importance of assessment and labs. Special population considerations (birth assigned gender, age, other medical comorbidity considerations) FDA approval indications Typical dosing with discussion on therapeutic endpoints for psychiatric use Major drug–drug interaction