Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

WEEK 5

Please see attached for instruction

To Prepare

· By Day 1, your instructor will assign a mood or anxiety disorder diagnosis for you to use for this Assignment.

· Research signs and symptoms for your diagnosis, pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological treatments, and appropriate community resources and referrals.

Assigned diagnosis is Autism spectrum disorder

The Assignment

In a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience, explain signs and symptoms for your diagnosis, pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological treatments, and appropriate community resources and referrals.
Although you are not required to respond to colleagues, collegial discussion is welcome. 

Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week5_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week5_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience: • Explain signs and symptoms for the assigned diagnosis in children and adolescents.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and concisely explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for children and adolescents with the diagnosis.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and concisely explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and concisely explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

Approach concept

To prepare for this Assignment: Review the Learning Resources assigned this week. Review the Concept Map resources. Explore the listed agonist spectrum and consider the action and receptor of each: Agonist Partial agonist Antagonist Inverse agonist The Assignment You will submit a concept map exploring the four agonists on the

final project

  Write a 700-750 word paper including the following: 1. At the top of your paper, write, “I affirm that I have not received or given any unauthorized assistance on this assignment/exam. I understand that the instructor has access to information regarding my submission’s integrity.” 2. In your own words,

Lorem, Ipsum

JBI Appraisal Tool Utilization For each article you are required to utilize the appropriate JBI Critical Appraisal Tool. After you have determined which of the Tools is appropriate for the article, you will download the Word file of the Tool and fill it out. Once you have completed the 4

NUR 630

Reply from Leeann Chang Module 7 Discussion Minors discovering their gender identity is an immense provision towards psychological health, self-awareness and emotional level being stabilized. The Adolescence stage is a crucial one in the identity-making stage of development. The deprivation of the rights of minors to explore their gender can

springfield, Oasha

  Module 09 Lippincott Advisor for Education: Problem Based Care Plan Lippincott Advisor for Education: Problem Based Care Plan Lippincott Advisor for Education: Problem Based Care Plan Generator is located in the CoursePoint Dashboard folder. Develop a care plan for one of the following patient concerns (see grading rubric below):

learners assesment

Learner’s Need Assignment [Student Name] [Course Number]: [Course Name] [Professor’s Name] West Coast University Los Angeles Campus [Due Date] Learners Needs Assignment Learning Style Assessment [What does the client (patient/family) say about their learning style?] Teaching Approach [How will you teach a client with this learning style?] Readiness Evaluation [How

NUR 514 discussion #7

Module 7 Discussion   Female Patient Cases 5 For this Discussion, your instructor will assign you three case  numbers. Case 4  Cases The Diagnosis criteria for Pre-eclampsia based on the ACOG guidelines and the maternal and fetal complications related. Questions for the case · Discuss the Diagnosis criteria for Pre-eclampsia based

IV

Instructions Read the scenario below and respond using clear, concise clinical reasoning. Your response must be a paragraph long. This assignment assesses your foundational knowledge of IV insertion, complication recognition, and appropriate nursing interventions. Scenario You begin your shift and take over care for a patient receiving IV fluids at

Unit V DB Health

see attached DB V •  Your initial post should be at least 200 words in length. Post 3: Response post to a second classmate or the instructor’s follow-up question is due by the end of day on Tuesday. You recently helped your patient review a denied insurance claim for a routine

Biostadistic

Data Set Code – InDist 1 7532 1 7532 1 7532 1 5380 1 7532 1 5300 1 4193 1 9534 1 5152 1 4354 1 5652 1 6335 1 5792 1 5792 1 5792 1 5674 1 5792 1 5718 1 5652 1 5268 1 5306 1 4193 1

Biostadistic

 Module 7: Assignment 1 Using the below dataset calculate in Excel; R and p-value to determine the power of association and if your calculations are statistically significant. V1 (Input Y Range) (Dependent Variable) V2 (Input X Range) (Independent Variable) 12 45 15 54 17 61 13 51 18 70 20 73

Biostadistic

Module 7: Assignment 2 The Mann-Whitney U Test is a nonparametric version of the independent samples t-test. The test primarily deals with two independent samples that contain ordinal data. The following example explained the comparison between the nonparametric versus parametric tests. 1. Select the best choice for the analysis and explain

Biostadistic

Module 6: Assignment 2 In a prior example we evaluated data from a survey of university graduates which assessed, among other things, how frequently they exercised. The survey was completed by 470 graduates. In the prior example we used the χ goodness-of-fit test to assess whether there was a shift in

Help with reseach

See attachment before bid.  Assignment 7 Final This week you will complete and submit your final paper. Include the table of content (outline) and abstract you wrote last week and the complete reference list in your final submission.  As a reminder, in your final paper, be sure to also include:

nurse interview

Am a nursing student and i attended my leadership clinicals at mercy hospital. on day one, i followed my preceptor for 12hours from 6am to 6pm on all of the 7 clinical day rotation she is an RN BSN nurse and the i was doing a leadership in nursing clinicals

home work

Competency This deliverable will allow you to apply deductive and inductive reasoning to analyze and create valid arguments. Instructions Part I: Consider the following definition: 1. A  fruit is the product of a tree or other plant that contains seeds and can be eaten as food. 2. A  fruit is the reproductive

NUR514W7

DISCUSSION: Once you received your case number; answer the specific question on the table above. Then, continue to discuss the 3 topics listed below for your case: 1. An effective health assessment incorporates not only physiological parameters; please suggest other parameters that should be considered and included on health assessments to reach