Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

WEEK 5

Please see attached for instruction

To Prepare

· By Day 1, your instructor will assign a mood or anxiety disorder diagnosis for you to use for this Assignment.

· Research signs and symptoms for your diagnosis, pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological treatments, and appropriate community resources and referrals.

Assigned diagnosis is Autism spectrum disorder

The Assignment

In a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience, explain signs and symptoms for your diagnosis, pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological treatments, and appropriate community resources and referrals.
Although you are not required to respond to colleagues, collegial discussion is welcome. 

Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week5_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week5_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience: • Explain signs and symptoms for the assigned diagnosis in children and adolescents.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and concisely explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for children and adolescents with the diagnosis.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and concisely explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and concisely explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response accurately explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

advanced pathophysiology

See attached  document for instructions APA format 7th edition. Please cite at least 3 credible sources. Patient is a 45-year-old male presenting with an acute onset of pain that began in his legs and has since spread to his lower back. The pain is rated 9/10 and described as deep,

Gerontology Power Point Presentation

Case Presentation-PowerPoint Presentation Develop a PowerPoint presentation on a clinical case for a 75-year-old female patient with Restless Legs Syndrome. 1. Provide information about the incidence, prevalence, and pathophysiology of the disease/disorder to the cellular level. 2. Educate advanced practice nurses on assessment and care/treatment, including genetics/genomics—specific for this disorder.

final disc

Now that you are in your final course in your program, it is time to turn in earnest to preparing for certification and licensure. You will need to take and pass a national FNP certification exam.  Once certified, you will then be eligible to apply for licensure as an advanced

Nursing Assignment

Nursing Program Clinical II – SIM 4 – Case Studies *to be done early in the semester Case Study 1   Scenario P.M., 24-year-old house painter, too ill to work the past 3 days. Arrived at your outpatient clinic with his girlfriend, he seems alert but acutely ill, with an

home work

Competency This deliverable will allow you to demonstrate your ability to clearly discern between valid and invalid arguments. Instructions Consider the following arguments All chickens have feathers. This animal has feathers. Therefore, this animal is a chicken. All chickens are green. No green birds eat pickles. Therefore, no chickens eat

Help with Research

See outline.  For your Final Assignment (Due in Module 7), you will use everything that you have learned in this course. You will select, analyze and appraise a quantitative study of your choice that uses one of the following designs: · Survey Research · Correlational Research · Experimental Research ·

NR 449 W5D

  This area provides you with an opportunity to reflect on what you have learned and what concepts you still need further exploration on.  Answer 1 question. Include a short summary of what has been learned, and include question(s) that are still unclear.   Post your answer to 1 of

SAM

Now that you have engaged with the learning resources in this module, you are ready to apply the principles of improvement science to your own practice setting – whether in a direct or indirect care role.  This assignment focuses on connecting real-world healthcare improvement needs with benchmarking, the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA)

nursing

Post a response including the following: Identify the gap in knowledge (in the research article) and the gap in practice (in the QI study) presented in the articles provided. Explain how the practice-focused question emerged in the DNP EBP project. Review Chapter 4 in Bissett et al., (2025). Evaluate the

Pharmacology

Write a research paper in regards to a drug or drug therapy and explain in detail about the study and why it is important. Include the following criteria: Subject: Beta blocker therapy post myocardial infarction MI Example these topic Beta-blockers are a standard part of post-MI therapy because they provide

Pharmacology

Write a research paper in regards to a drug or drug therapy and explain in detail about the study and why it is important. Include the following criteria: Subject: Beta blocker therapy post myocardial infarction MI Example these topic Beta-blockers are a standard part of post-MI therapy because they provide

AI tool

Describe the information you gathered from the AI tool and any errors found as well as corrections made

powerpoint nursing

Nursing Theorist Powerpoint Rough Draft  This assignment is mandatory and gives the student an opportunity to receive feedback on the nurse theorist Power Point presentation. I will review it and make comments in order to improve your work. You may choose a nurse theorist for your Power point presentation or

Nursing Technology

Transforming Nursing DQ1 Question: For this Discussion, reflect on the role of individual nursing informatics innovators and consider their contributions, the impact of their contributions, and what you might specifically learn from them in your nursing practice. Reflect on your background and experiences in nursing informatics. Explore on how you

Gerontology Clinicals Discussion 6

Module 6 Discussion     Weekly Clinical Experience 6 Describe your clinical experience for this week for 69-year-old complaining of wheezing, shortness of breath, chest tightness, and coughing with a history of asthma. · Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they? · Describe the assessment

Gerontology Module 6 Discussion

Module 6 Discussion     Case 5 A 79-year-old male remarks on his first visit that he has noticed a gradual decrease in vision in both his eyes since last year. His old medical record has not yet arrived at your office. He states that since he moved from Florida

sam

After engaging with the learning resources in this module, your knowledge and understanding of the importance of “Teams” for achieving optimum outcomes has grown.  Now it is time to examine the Team structure and Team process in your practice setting and to identify the essential Team members for promoting the