SEE ATTACHED.
2
Human Resource Development HRA-539-MBOL1
Assignments
HR Application 3
Top of Form
|
Turnitin™ |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Instructions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It’s time to create a training plan for the new inventory system! Here are the learning objectives that should be addressed in the trainings:
Your deliverables for this assignment: · Detailed training schedule · Brief narrative report addressing the questions below A training plan/schedule should at minimum include information on timing, a brief description of training techniques, tools and locations, and info on who will be conducting the training. Remember that training is all about Please address the following in your narrative report: · Did you prioritize fidelity or cost, or try to balance both? Explain your reasoning. · Comment on how you structured your training, particularly in reference to the 2 groups who needed training. · Which learning outcome(s) were prioritized, and why? Expect to take 1-2 pages for your training plan/schedule and an additional 1-2 pages for your narrative report for a total of about 3-4 pages. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Due on Aug 4, 2024 11:59 PM |
Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: HRA Written Assignment Rubric
|
Criteria |
Exceeds Expectations 10 points |
Meets Expectations 8 points |
Level 1 5 points |
Criterion Score |
|
CONTENT – Addressing the assignment, answering all the questions, following instructions. |
Position, plan, or thesis is very credible, logical, research sources are credible and sufficient to support arguments |
Position, plan, or thesis is credible, sources are credible; portions of the assignment may not be fully addressed |
Position, plan or thesis lacks credibility, arguments are not clear or not well supported, sources are not credible or do not support arguments; portions of the assignment are not addressed at all |
Score of CONTENT – Addressing the assignment, answering all the questions, following instructions., / 10 |
|
CLARITY – Organization and flow, the writing is complete while also concise |
Concepts presented are clearly organized and easy to understand, early information leads to later information, coherently summarized |
Concepts presented are not organized logically, no coherent summary |
Concepts presented are unclear or difficult to understand, paper is disorganized and does not follow logical progression |
Score of CLARITY – Organization and flow, the writing is complete while also concise, / 10 |
|
CREATIVITY – Writing is interesting, considers old ideas in new ways, includes illustrative examples |
Presents new ideas and/or old ideas in interesting ways, writing style is formal but maintains interest, includes real-world applications |
Presents widely accepted ideas or discusses topics that are already well known without much attention to original content or reader interest |
Presents ideas that are clichéd or imitative, does not make topic interesting for reader |
Score of CREATIVITY – Writing is interesting, considers old ideas in new ways, includes illustrative examples, / 10 |
|
CRITICAL THINKING – identifying fact vs. opinion, action and consequence, recognizing multiple perspectives on issues |
Clearly identifies assumptions, considers all implications and consequences of outcomes, and includes more than one point of view on the topic |
Treats some assumptions as fact, and/or considers some implications but not others, and/or does not fully consider point of view |
Fails to identify assumptions, and/or does not consider implications of outcomes, and/or is fixed on a single point of view without any opposing information |
Score of CRITICAL THINKING – identifying fact vs. opinion, action and consequence, recognizing multiple perspectives on issues, / 10 |
|
CORRECTNESS – Grammar, spelling, punctuation, formatting and academic writing style |
Grammar is appropriate, spelling, punctuation & formatting accurate, follows APA style guidelines if appropriate |
Grammar is appropriate, some spelling, punctuation or formatting errors, missing elements of APA style guidelines |
Grammar, spelling, punctuation and/or formatting are inappropriate, incorrect and unprofessional, no APA style guidelines |
Score of CORRECTNESS – Grammar, spelling, punctuation, formatting and academic writing style, / 10 |
Total
Score of HRA Written Assignment Rubric,
/ 50
Overall Score
Bottom of Form
