Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Week Five Assignment[WLOs: 1, 4, 5] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4] “Confounding is the term used to describe distortion of the estimate of the effect of an exposure of interest because it is mixed with the effect

Week Five Assignment[WLOs: 1, 4, 5] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4]

“Confounding is the term used to describe distortion of the estimate of the effect of an exposure of interest because it is mixed with the effect of an extraneous factor. According to Susser, a confounding variable is “an independent variable that varies systematically with the hypothetical causal variable under study. When uncontrolled, the effects of a confounding variable cannot be distinguished from those of the study variable” (Friis & Sellers, 2014, pg. 445). 

In your Week Five assignment, please answer the following questions:

  • Define confounding and state how confounding can affect a study’s conclusion. What is meant by Simpson’s paradox and how does it pertain to confounding? How do epidemiologic researchers control for confounding?
  • Suppose as an epidemiologist you are responsible for measuring study participants’ blood pressure. Some dropped the instrument and the needle on the gauge has been bent so that the readings are too high. What type of error is this? What type of error would occur if the instrument is working properly but only one person took only measurement from each person? How could you minimize each of the foregoing types of error?

Consider the following scenario to answer questions c through h: The death rate per 100,000 for lung cancer is 7 among nonsmokers and 71 among smokers. The death rate per 100,000 for coronary thrombosis is 422 among nonsmokers and 599 among smokers. The prevalence of smoking in the population is 55% (If necessary, refer to the chapter 9 on cohort studies for formulas for relative risk (RR) Be sure to show the formulas for your work as well as your calculations. Present your final results and their interpretation in a table format.

  • What is the RR of dying of lung cancer for smokers versus nonsmokers?
  • What is the RR of dying of coronary thrombosis for smokers versus nonsmokers?
  • What is the etiologic fraction of disease due to smoking among individuals with lung cancer?
  • What is the etiologic fraction of disease due to smoking among individuals with coronary thrombosis?
  • What is the population etiologic fraction of lung cancer due to smoking?
  • What is the population etiologic fraction of coronary thrombosis due to smoking?
    • Determine whether or not the interpretation of the study results could be subject to bias.

The Week Five Assignment must

  • Be two to four double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA styleLinks to an external site. as outlined in the UAGC Writing CenterLinks to an external site.. The length of your response should be sufficient to answer each question fully.
  • Show calculations for solving problems using text, an equation editor, a clear photo, or scan of legible pen or pencil calculations either saved as an image and inserted into your assignment document or attached as a .pdf file. If doing the later, your .pdf image should be descriptively named using the following format: lastnamefirstinitialWeek5AssignmentQuestion.pdf. For example, Marge Innovera would save her file as innoveramWeek5AssignmentQuestionA.pdf
  • Must include a separate title pageLinks to an external site. with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted

Carefully review the Grading RubricLinks to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

On Page 27 of the CMS Quality Strategy Document “Engage Individuals and Communities to become partners in their care” is stated to be an overall objective of this quality initiative. The author(s) of

On Page 27 of the CMS Quality Strategy Document “Engage Individuals and Communities to become partners in their care” is stated to be an overall objective of this quality initiative.  The author(s) of this article then provide four specific outcomes which demonstrate this.  How might the HIM Profession contribute to

On Page 27 of the CMS Quality Strategy Document “Engage Individuals and Communities to become partners in their care” is stated to be an overall objective of this quality initiative. The author(s) of

On Page 27 of the CMS Quality Strategy Document “Engage Individuals and Communities to become partners in their care” is stated to be an overall objective of this quality initiative.  The author(s) of this article then provide four specific outcomes which demonstrate this.  How might the HIM Profession contribute to

Question : Write a Case study on Lynch Syndrome and Ethical Implications in Nursing Practice Content: CaseStudy is summarized with constructs well defined. Evident that student synthesized learning.

Question : Write a Case study on  Lynch Syndrome and Ethical Implications in Nursing Practice Content: CaseStudy is summarized with constructs well defined. Evident that student synthesized learning. Includes introduction, summary and implications for practice.                              

Follow instructions below for case analysis and rubric is links below: Use the same case that you began to analyze in part 1 with assessment of: medical indicationspatient preferencesSegment 2 will co

Follow instructions below for case analysis and rubric is links below: Use the same case that you began to analyze in part 1 with assessment of: medical indications patient preferences Segment 2 will continue your assessment with inclusion of:  3. quality-of-life considerations   4. contextual features Segment 2 will also include an organized problem-solving section that:  defines

Follow instructions below for case analysis and rubric is attached in the files: Use the same case that you began to analyze in part 1 with assessment of: medical indicationspatient preferencesSegment

Follow instructions below for case analysis and rubric is attached in the files: Use the same case that you began to analyze in part 1 with assessment of: medical indications patient preferences Segment 2 will continue your assessment with inclusion of:  3. quality-of-life considerations   4. contextual features Segment 2 will also include an organized problem-solving section

Case: Let’s Cut the Deadweight. Complete the three questions for the case. APA format. case: Let’s Cut the Deadweight Two supervisors, Robert and Janet, were in charge of sections of the building s

Case: Let’s Cut the Deadweight.  Complete the three questions for the case.  APA format. case: Let’s Cut the Deadweight  Two supervisors, Robert and Janet, were in charge of sections of the building services department of Centrat Hespital. They had a fairly close working relationship; they were in a position to

In the article “New Cancer Treatments Lie Hidden Under Mountains of Paperwork”, one of the researchers says that “Data are trapped.” Later in the same article, another researcher states that “About 5

In the article “New Cancer Treatments Lie Hidden Under Mountains of Paperwork”, one of the researchers says that “Data are trapped.”  Later in the same article, another researcher states that “About 50 percent, if not more, of the critical details we need for research are trapped in unstructured documents.” Please

Connections Journals are opportunities for students to identify and analyze some connections among key course components. Over the last 3 weeks of the course, the modules have introduced some key con

Connections Journals are opportunities for students to identify and analyze some connections among key course components.  Over the last 3 weeks of the course, the modules have introduced some key concepts, such as surrogate decision making, advanced care planning, advanced directives and end-of-life decision making. For Connections Journal 2, write