Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

week9

please see attached.

To Prepare

· Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.

· Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment. 

The Assignment (2–3 pages)

· Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

· Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from literature.

· Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

· Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

·
Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Nursing Homework

General Instructions   To implement evidence-based practice, advanced practice nurses must evaluate current research findings for application to practice. Create a PowerPoint Presentation and address the following requirements:   1. Download the  Week 7 Evidence-Based Practice Change template  Download Week 7 Evidence-Based Practice Change template Open this document with ReadSpeaker docReader.

NUR 640

Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation 3 Step 1: You will use the Graduate Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Template  Download Graduate Comprehensive Psychotherapy Evaluation Template to: 1. Compose a written comprehensive psychotherapy evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic. 2. Upload your completed comprehensive psychotherapy evaluation as a Word doc. Scanned PDFs will

nurse

Now that you have completed the priority aspects of 1.0 and 2.0 of the Hoshin-Kanri Model for strategic planning, the time has come to complete aspect 3.0. · Reflect back on the goals identified in your Part 1 and Part 2 assignments. · Create a PowerPoint presentation that outlines at

PowerPoint on Dementia, Alzheimer’s

Write a comprehensive 10–15 minute PowerPoint presentation on dementia. The presentation should clearly define dementia and provide an in-depth discussion of its classifications, major types, underlying causes, risk factors (both modifiable and non-modifiable), diagnostic approach, and current treatment options, including both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management strategies.  Use this book if

EBP

Module 5:  Univariate and Multivariate Analysis Prepare an essay presenting the use of univariate and multivariate analysis in clinical studies.   Instructions As a DNP, you have been assigned to perform a database search of articles from peer-reviewed journals. To start the process, you need to explore what specific databases

EBP

Module 6:  Article Grading Table Instructions Prepare a data extraction of 5 peer reviewed journals. As a DNP, you need to be able to evaluate peer reviewed journals and appropriately appraise the articles to evaluate if the information can be used to answer the clinical question. Clinical Question: In patients

Discussion 6

The Result & Discussion Section Please answer the questions below. 1. What must be included in the result and discussion section of the research paper? 2. Select a research result and state whether it includes the necessary elements. Why and why not? Submission Instructions: · Your initial post should be

Lorem,lpsum

NR293 Pharmacology for Nursing Practice Medication Teaching Plan Guidelines © 2024 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved NR293_JUL24_RUA_Medication_Teaching_Plan_Guidelines_V6.docx 1 3 Purpose The purpose of this assignment is for the student to synthesize pharmacological knowledge (i.e., core drug knowledge, core patient variables, and nursing implications) of pharmacotherapeutic agents into a useful teaching

MINI SOAP NOTE

MUST BE OBGYN TOPIC/DIAGNOSIS  MINI SOAP NOTES DO NOT INCLUDE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS  PLEASE ONLY INCLUDE WHAT IS ASKED FOR ON THE ATTACHMENT 

Can you help by tomorrow?

PHIL 347 Critical Reasoning Week 6 Guided Learning Activity: Evaluating Expertise and Source Reliability Directions: Type the letter answer into Canvas. You may also include the whole line. The letter comes before the line or sentence Example: [A] Paris is the biggest city in France. [B] It is a major

Can you help by tomorrow?

Week 6 Assignment This checklist should be the final step as you prepare to write your argumentative essay. You should have completed your research and thought about what you will write and how you will present it. This checklist will help you to organize your points and make sure you

Can you help by tomorrow?

Technical Resources for This Activity Tips! It is recommended that you use one of the following for your Creative Writing Assignment: · An MS Word document template for  flyersLinks to an external site. or  brochuresLinks to an external site. · A  PowerPoint slideLinks to an external site. · A  CanvaLinks to an

Family Disaster Plan Checklist

  Complete all sections. Use yes, check marks, or X’s for items you do have. Use need or no for items you do not have Use N/A, for items not applicable for your living situation. Do not leave anything blank. Remember to protect personal information by using pseudonyms, or by

help with home work

Nu 506 Unit 6 assignment: Practice and the Workplace : All people need medical care. Stigma, bias, and systematic inequalities in health care settings can hinder individuals from receiving the support and care every patient deserves. In addition, public policies can contribute to social environments, worsening or alleviating the stigma of

Nursing Nursing Homework Help

ORIGINAL WORK ONLY Population: Nursing Mothers 2. Module 6, Part 2 (15 Points): You must submit two documents: (1) APA paper Teaching Evaluation Paper and (2) the Teaching Plan Template with the evaluation column completed. (submit end of Module 6) Module 6, Part 2: Evaluation of Teaching Experience (15 points)

QUESTIONS

1 NR222 Health and Wellness Required Uniform Assignment: Health Promotion Paper Guidelines NR222 Health Promo ti on Project Guidelines V6.docx ®2022 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved 11 Purpose This assignment allows the learner to apply knowledge gained about health promotion concepts and strategies, enhance written communication skills, and demonstrate a

nursing

In last week’s assignment, using the Hoshin-Kanri Model, you laid the ground work for your strategic plan by addressing model items 1.1, 1.1.1, and 1.1.2. The next part of your strategic plan development is to identify the objectives and resources required to achieve them. Continuing with the Hoshin-Kanri Model, this

Community Health

Please See Attached. 4-6 pages. Complete the following: · Assess your chosen community to include socioeconomic and demographic data such as location, lifestyle, age, race, ethnicity, gender, marital status, income, education, employment. (Complete the windshield surveys first.) · Choose a specific health concern or health need from the Assessment 1