Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

week9

please see attached.

To Prepare

· Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.

· Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment. 

The Assignment (2–3 pages)

· Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

· Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from literature.

· Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

· Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

·
Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

home work

Competency 1. Identify the major concepts of selected nursing theories. 2. Differentiate the components of the research process. 3. Compare research methodologies. 4. Explain the relationship between research, theory, and evidence-based practice. 5. Propose an evidence-based solution aligned with an evidence-based practice question. Scenario As a BSN prepared Registered Nurse

Can you help by tomorrow?

Week 7 Assignment This week, all the hard work you have done in researching your topic and issue will come to fruition in your argumentative paper. Address the requirements below to complete your paper: 1. Follow the directions in the assigned textbook reading on how to write an argumentative essay

NUR 640

NUR 640 Weekly Discussion FYI Remember… I am a Black Haitian American Female live in USA, FL Submission Instructions: • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points. Week

Staff Education

My Topic is : Clinical Skills & Best Practices Pain management: pharmacologic & non-pharmacologic as a new nurse 

Nursing Bj edit assignment

bj edit assignment  Herzing University, 2025 Problem Statement Worksheet NU801 Project Development and Management Herzing University Beverly Jordan 02/08/2026 Professor Dr. Natasha Colvin Constructing a Problem Statement Questions Responses What is the problem? Many of the veterans who have been referred out of outpatient mental health clinics do not follow

2 soap notes rw

2 soap notes rw SOAP Note _______ NU___:_________ Herzing University Name:_________________________ Typhon Encounter #: _____________________ Comprehensive:____Focused:____ S: SUBJECTIVE DATA CC: What are they being seen for? This is the reason that the patient sought care, stated in their own words/words of their caregiver, or paraphrased. HPI: Use the “OLDCART” approach

565 week 8 discussion

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the Collaboration Café. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.  Include the following sections:  Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail. Look back at your initial post and respond to peers and faculty that have commented.  Reflect on your learning

Nursing week 7 assignment instructions

Critical Research Appraisal Assignment Goal: You will critically appraise a research design Selected Qualitative Research Article (2023) Kivunja, S., Pryor, J., River, J., & Gullick, J. (2024). Conceptualizing personhood in nursing care for people with altered consciousness, cognition, and behaviors: A qualitative discussion paper. Nursing Philosophy, 25(3), e12490. Selected Quantitative

Week 7 assigm

Complete this assignment assuming the perspective of a member of a QI team in charge of reviewing facility policies and procedures related to Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers (HAPUs). Section 1: Identify Describe your assigned topic and why it is a concern in healthcare. Summarize a current policy or procedure at your

reflection

Required headings include: Relevant and Meaningful Service Enhanced Academic Learning Purposeful Civic Learning Purposeful Reflections Critical Thinking/Conclusion

Nursing week 3 assignment

Middle Range Theory Utilization and Application: Kolcaba’s Theory of Comfort Yairys Pereda St. Thomas University NUR 501: Philosophical & Theoretical Evidence-Based Research Professor: Dr. Eleni S. Miralles January 26, 2026 Abstract Middle range nursing theories provide practical frameworks that bridge abstract concepts and clinical application. Kolcaba’s Theory of Comfort is

Community Health

Please see attached. Research a selected local, national, or global nonprofit organization or government agency from the document provided. Determine how the organization or agency contributes to public health and safety improvements, promotes equal opportunity, and improves the quality of life within the community. Selected organization : National Alliance on

Discussion #6

Module 6 Discussion     Approaches to Disease Management: Hypertension  After studying Module 6: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following: Read Garzon, D. L., Driessnack, M., Dirks, M., Duderstadt, K. G., & Gaylord, N. M. (2024). · Chapter 32: Respiratory Disorders · Chapter 33: Cardiovascular Disorders · Chapter 34: Gastrointestinal

Nursing Assignment

Part 1: STAFF EDUCATION PLAN Data must be supported by evidence-based literature with APA reference list included – (25 points) ***Use of Artificial Intelligence or prohibited outside resources to complete this project is strictly prohibited.*** I. PART 1: THE PLAN A.  Determine a Learning Need: (10 points) – use template

Nursing week 6 assignment

Scholarly Writing For this assignment, you will write a paper on the pharmacological management of the disease. The paper should include a review of the: · Select a disease process that is of interest to you- Cystic fibrosis · Pathophysiology of the disease state. · Review of the pharmacological agents

Nursing homework

Topic-Rapid Response vs. code Blue: Knowing when to Act Part 1: STAFF EDUCATION PLAN Data must be supported by evidence-based literature with APA reference list included – (25 points) ***Use of Artificial Intelligence or prohibited outside resources to complete this project is strictly prohibited.*** I. PART 1: THE PLAN A.