Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

week9

please see attached.

To Prepare

· Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.

· Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment. 

The Assignment (2–3 pages)

· Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

· Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from literature.

· Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

· Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

·
Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

nur521

I need assistance with a question  Realistic Treatment Plan For this assignment, you will develop a realistic clinical case presentation. Use PowerPoint to create the slides for your presentation.  Do not use the notes section for rubric information, as it will not be graded; all information must be included in

Qualitative Journal

Qualitative Journal Club: Instructions Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize you with the various components of a qualitative research study and methodology. Instructions: For this discussion, please complete the following: 1. Complete the Qualitative Journal Club Template in a Word document 1. At the top of the template provide an APA

HEALTH ASSESSMENT

   Reflection questions 1. The patient was newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. What social determinants of health (SDOH) should the nurse assess for that could impact the patient’s ability for diabetes self-management? 2. What are some environmental and/or individual factors that could impact the patient’s ability for diabetes self-management? 

Week 6

please see attached    Assignment: Research an article on Crisis or Disasters, summarize the article and create a care plan for a person in Crisis in the discussion post.  Article:Impact of  Crisis  Care on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness and/or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review  • 2024 Introduction: 

Compp

Using the  Windshield Survey,  while in your community, you will assess the community location. This will lead to a list of identified, prioritized health needs and your recommendations for intervention. You will complete a windshield survey of your community. The objective of a windshield survey is to assess a community

Case study

help with 1-2 case study In 1 -2 pages, answer the questions below in detail. You must use current evidence-based resources to support your answers. Follow APA guidelines. and the grading rubric. Chief Compliant: Mrs. Lin Zhang is a 52-year-old Chinese-American woman who presents with chronic lower back pain, bilateral knee

Nursing Literature Review & Evidence Matrix Assignment

will attached instructions in notepad Evidence Matrix Name: ______________________________ Date: _____________________________ Author Journal Name/ Year of Publication Research Design Sample Size Outcome Variables Measured Quality (A, B, C) Results/Author’s Suggested Conclusion Research Design Options: Quantitative, Qualitative, Systematic Review, Mixed Method Study Outcome variables measured: what is the researcher trying to

Discussion

Case Presentation-PowerPoint Presentation Develop a PowerPoint presentation on a clinical case that was seen during your experience or a topic that is of interest to you. 1. Select a health problem that primarily affect the older adult population. Topic: Rheumatoid Arthritis. 2. Provide information about the incidence, prevalence, and pathophysiology

MOdule 4 Pharm

Describe causes of Upper respiratory infections and drug therapy  Discuss triggers of asthma and treatment options Discuss corticosteroids  Describe chronic bronchitis and treatment options Describe diagnostic criteria for nausea and vomiting and treatment recommendations Discuss symptoms of GERD, complications, and drug management Compare and contrast Crohn’s disease and Ulcerative colitis

Assessment

See attached for instructions 1 Assessment 04 – Remote Collaboration and Evidence-Based Care Create a 5-10 minute video of yourself, as a presenter, in which you will propose an evidence- based plan to improve the outcomes the patient in the provided case study below, and examine how remote collaboration provided

WK 9 DISC

3   Back to Week at a Glance Ethics, Cyber Ethics, and Security In recent years, hackers have targeted medical records, from hospitals and other healthcare institutions, across the country. These records contain personal information, contact information, and most importantly, for the hackers, information that may prove useful in stealing

Professional Portfolio

Daniela Padron 786-461-0734 [email protected] Opa-locka, FL 33055 CONTACT SKILLS Organized• Team Player• Critical Thinking skills• Time management• Punctual• Hard working• Decision Making• Creative Problem Solving• Blood Draw and Sample Collection • Clinical judgment• Vitals monitoring• Spanish/English Fluency• Dedicated and compassionate Registered Nurse (RN) with progressive career history in direct patient

Comproimp

briefly describe one community health problem from your community’s health improvement plan. What structure, process, and outcome standards would you use to evaluate a program addressing this problem?

SOAP

need to come up with a SOAP note following this specific algorithm. Instructions will be provided. 

Discussion post/case study

Topic: What is the Impact of using teach back to educate Latino men on the importance of lifestyle changes, exercise and medication adherence to blood pressure medication?