Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

week9

please see attached.

To Prepare

· Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.

· Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment. 

The Assignment (2–3 pages)

· Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

· Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from literature.

· Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

· Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Contains one or two APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Contains three or four APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors

5 pts

Total Points: 100

·
Previous
Next

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

NUR 640

NUR 640 Weekly Discussion FYI Remember… I am a Black Haitian American Female live in USA, FL Submission Instructions: • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.  Your initial post is worth 8 points. Week

Hello can this be helped with by tomorrow ?

Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: · Textbook: Chapter 3 · Lesson Instructions Click the tab below to review the description of the course project.  Course Project Overview Week 2 Assignment:  This week, you will choose one of the following topics for your project.  Step 1: Pick

Nursing Module 7 assignment

PowerPoint presentation with a realistic case study and include appropriate and pertinent clinical information that will be covering the following Subjective data Objective data:  Assessment: Plan:  Other: 

ethical issues related to wearable technologies

What are the ethical issues related to dexcom blood glucose monitoring Week 5 Assignment Part 2: Ethical Issues with Wearable Technologies Template Directions: Use the wearable technology selected in the Week 3 Part 1: Examining Wearable Technologies assignment. Use this template to complete the Part 2: Ethical Issues with Wearable

Bj week 5

Bj week 5 Enhancing Referral Follow-Through for Veterans in Outpatient Mental Health Care

Asssigment part 2 part one attached

Module 3:  Selecting a Topic and Designing a Clinical Question using PICOT Taxonomy Instructions:   Create an essay of a minimum of five pages explaining the PICOT format and what is the importance of following the PICOT format when formulating the clinical question? 1. What is the PICOT Format? 2. What

Mm week 4 gap analysis

Mm week 4 gap  1 Gap Analysis – Fall Risk Prevention and Assessment Nurse-Led. Michelle Murray Herzing University NU801 Dr. Stephanie Turner Jan 30, 2026 2 Gap Analysis – Fall Risk Prevention and Assessment Nurse-Led. Background: Older adults in adult day care settings experience falls, which is a severe patient

Healthcare laws

see file 1. Policy Application: Find a policy, set of guidelines, or government regulations and apply it to the organization’s work on the chosen topic: PREVENTING WORKPLACE VIOLANCE. 2. You may choose a policy you have access to from your organization. Other sources of policies include those published online from a

help with home work

Discussion 5: Topic: Influencing Healthcare Policy Nurs: 507 Why is it important that health professionals share a common understanding of safety standards and practice for all stakeholders? What are policy implications within an institution related to federal and state regulations? Format/Style/APA/ Citations (20%) 2-3 paragraph

Lorem, ipsum

U 700 Unit 5-KTA Part 1: Alternate Intervention Paper 1. You are going to construct an APA-formatted paper for the assignment. 2. Provide an APA-formatted title page. 3. Develop an introduction section that discusses the professional nurses’ role for the implementation of an improvement project. 4. Provide a review of

NUR 640

Reply from Eliset Campos Rivas Module 4 Discussion: Automatic Thoughts Completing automatic thought records is a common cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) homework assignment, but it can be particularly difficult for patients with depression. Depression is often described as being in the “darkest of dark” places, where even the simplest tasks

nursing

Purpose The student will review the current NCLEX-RN test plan and reflect on areas for improvement and strategies to support the student’s transition to practice. The student will assess clinical learning against the activity statements outlined in the test plan and determine next steps to explore new opportunities in future

Hello can this be helped with by tomorrow ?

The arguments against marijuana are just wrong and shouldn’t even be discussed.          I use it, and I’m just fine, so I don’t see how it could be harmful. I don’t see those people who are fighting to outlaw marijuana also out there fighting to outlaw alcohol.

Dh assessment 1 revise

Dh assessment 1 revise 2 Capella University Darren Holton January 30, 2026 Communication Styles and Professional Effectiveness Understanding Key Communication Styles Communication style influences how individuals convey ideas, handle disagreement, and interact with others in professional environments. In workplace communication, four commonly recognized styles are passive, aggressive, passive-aggressive, and assertive.

nonmaleficence

 In healthcare, the principle of nonmaleficence—”do no harm”—is foundational to ethical decision-making. However, many medical interventions carry inherent risks of harm, even when intended to benefit the patient. How should healthcare professionals balance the principle of nonmaleficence with the potential benefits of a treatment or procedure? Are there situations where

nur

I need help with your expertise Psychiatric SOAP Note Template Encounter date: ________________________ Patient Initials: ______ Gender: M/F/Transgender ____ Age: _____ Race: _____ Ethnicity ____ Reason for Seeking Health Care: ______________________________________________ HPI:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ SI/HI: _______________________________________________________________________________ Sleep:  _________________________________________         Appetite:  ________________________ Allergies(Drug/Food/Latex/Environmental/Herbal): ___________________________________ Current perception of Health: Excellent Good