Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

WK 4

Back to Week at a Glance

Randomized Trials in Epidemiology

Imagine that researchers are conducting a randomized controlled trial of a high-fiber supplement as a preventive measure in persons at increased risk of type 2 diabetes. People enrolled in the study are disease free at the time they agree to participate in the trial, but they all have a family history of type 2 diabetes and are considered at high risk (80%) to develop the disease during their lifetime. The 10,000 participants who start the trial are healthy individuals who are randomly allocated to receive either high-fiber supplements or placebo for several years. As you can imagine, this study will be quite expensive and will require a large infrastructure of personnel and materials to carry it out successfully.

Because type 2 diabetes has reached epidemic proportions in the United States, the potential benefits of this research are important at a population level. Unfortunately, high-fiber supplements have also been shown in a few studies to be associated with gastrointestinal blockage (which can be life-threatening) and reduced nutrient absorption, which may lead to anemia, osteoporosis, and other debilitating chronic diseases. The supplements may also reduce absorption of certain medications and cause gastrointestinal distress. The potential side effects of continuous high-fiber supplementation are only partially understood, and long-term effects are unknown.

For this Discussion, you are asked to identify an example of an experimental study design in the literature and consider the ethical implications of the randomized controlled trial design.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 


WEEKLY RESOURCES

Required Readings

· Curley, A. L. C. (Ed.). (2024). 
Population-based nursing: Concepts and competencies for advanced practice (4th ed.). Springer.

· Chapter 2, “Identifying Outcomes in Population-Based Nursing” (pp. 20-38)

· Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021). 
Epidemiology for public health practice (6th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

· Chapter 8, “Experimental Study Designs”

· Goldstein, C. E., Weijer, C., Brehaut, J. C., Fergusson, D. A., Grimshaw, J. M., Horn, A. R., & Taljaard, M. (2018). 
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: A review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentationLinks to an external site.
BMC Medical Ethics
19(1), Article 14.

· Walden University Office of Research and Doctoral Services. (n.d.). 

Developing researchLinks to an external site.

Examples of Studies Utilizing Experimental and Quasi-experimental Study Designs

These studies should be used as informative examples. Please locate another article on your own to use for the Discussion.

· Hooshmand, M., & Foronda, C. (2018). 
Comparison of telemedicine to traditional face-to-face care for children with special needs: A quasiexperimental study
Telemedicine Journal and E-health: The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association
24(6), 433–441.

· Sawyer, A., Kaim, A., Le, H.-N., McDonald, D., Mittinty, M., Lynch, J., & Sawyer, M. (2019). 
The effectiveness of an app-based nurse-moderated program for new mothers with depression and parenting problems (eMums Plus): Pragmatic randomized controlled trialLinks to an external site.
Journal of Medical Internet Research
21(6), e13689.

Optional Resource

· Dennis, C. L., Grigoriadis, S., Zupancic, J., Kiss, A., & Ravitz, P. (2020). 
Telephone-based nurse-delivered interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression: Nationwide randomised controlled trialLinks to an external site.
The British Journal of Psychiatry
216(4), 189–196.

To prepare:

· Search databases in the Walden Library and locate a peer-reviewed article from the last 5 years that uses a randomized controlled trial study design. The subject of the study may be any topic professionally relevant or interesting to your practice. You may not select an article already posted by one of your colleagues for this Discussion. (
Tip: When searching, you may use “randomized trial” as one of your search phrases.)

· Critically analyze the following aspects of the research study:

· Purpose

· Study population

· Length of the trial

· Data collection methods

· Outcome measures

· Results and conclusions

· Ethical issues associated with the study

· Ask yourself: How did this research study benefit from its experimental design? What was achieved by randomization that might not otherwise have been achieved?

By Day 3 of Week 4

Post a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:

· Summarize the research study addressing the aspects bulleted above.

· Identify and discuss the ethical issues associated with this study.

· Be sure to include a link to the article in your post.

By Day 6 of Week 4

Respond to 
at least two colleagues on 
two different days in one or more of the following ways:

· Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research.

· Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.

· Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.

· Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.

· Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.

· Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.

RESPOND TO THIS POST

·
DENISE

·

·
Evaluating the PRO-P Trial Design Summarized

· I examined the PRO-P study by Al-Monajjed and colleagues (2024), which investigates how electronic symptom tracking might benefit prostate cancer patients after surgery.

·
Study Summary

· The researchers designed this randomized controlled trial to see if electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) monitoring improves quality of life for men recovering from prostate surgery. Their hypothesis makes intuitive sense—if doctors can spot complications earlier through digital monitoring, patients should experience better recovery.

· The study will include 430 men preparing for radical prostatectomy across multiple German hospitals. I appreciate that they’ve set clear eligibility requirements—participants need to be adults who can provide informed consent, understand German, and use the necessary technology. Each man will be followed for 6 months after surgery, with checkpoints before the procedure, at discharge, and at 1, 3, and 6 months afterward.

· The data collection approach is straightforward but effective. Both groups complete the same electronic questionnaires about their symptoms and wellbeing, but only the intervention group’s responses trigger alerts to healthcare providers when symptoms appear. Their primary goal is measuring quality of life at the 6-month mark using a standardized questionnaire, along with tracking several secondary outcomes like symptom severity and healthcare utilization. Since this is only a protocol paper, we don’t have results yet, but the research team expects electronic monitoring to lead to better

· symptom management and recovery experiences.

· Ethical Considerations

· I was astonished by how thoroughly the researchers addressed ethical concerns. As Goldstein et al. (2018) recommend for such trials, they obtained proper ethics committee approval and implemented comprehensive informed consent procedures. Both groups receive standard medical care, maintaining what researchers call “clinical equipoise,” with the intervention group receiving additional monitoring. They’ve also taken steps to protect patient data.

· I question the potential access disparities. The technology requirements might unintentionally exclude older patients or those less comfortable with digital tools. There’s also the question of whether withholding potentially beneficial monitoring from the control group raises ethical concerns, though this is an inherent challenge in many clinical trials.

· Benefits of Experimental Design

· What makes this study particularly valuable is its randomized controlled design. As Friis and Sellers (2021) explain, randomization allows researchers to determine if the electronic monitoring causes improvements. By randomly assigning patients to groups, factors like age, disease severity, and technological comfort are distributed evenly.

· Without this random assignment, the results would be far less reliable—tech-savvy patients might naturally gravitate toward the electronic monitoring option, skewing outcomes. The randomized approach ensures that any improvements in recovery can be credited to the monitoring system itself rather than pre-existing differences between patients.This methodically designed study could provide healthcare providers with evidence they need to implement electronic symptom monitoring as a standard practice in prostate

· cancer care.

· The article can be accessed at: 

Links to an external site.

· References

· Al-Monajjed, R., Albers, P., Droop, J., Fugmann, D., Noldus, J., Palisaar, R.-J., Ritter, M., Ellinger, J., Krausewitz, P., Truß, M., Hadaschik, B., Grünwald, V., Schrader, A.-J., Papavassilis, P., Ernstmann, N., Schellenberger, B., Moritz, A., Kowalski, C., Hellmich, M., & Karger, A. (2024). PRO-P: Evaluating the effect of electronic patient-reported outcome measures monitoring compared with standard care in prostate cancer patients undergoing surgery-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 25(1), Article 754. 

Links to an external site.

· Friis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2021). Epidemiology for public health practice (6th

· ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

· Goldstein, C. E., Weijer, C., Brehaut, J. C., Fergusson, D. A., Grimshaw, J. M., Horn, A. R., & Taljaard, M. (2018). Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: A review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation. BMC Medical Ethics, 19(1), Article 14. 

Links to an external site.

·

Reply

Previous

Next

image1.jpeg

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Nursing

see attachment For this assessment, you will propose a hypothetical health promotion plan addressing a particular health concern or health need affecting a fictitious individual or group living in the community. The hypothetical individual or group of your choice must be living in the community, not in a hospital, assistant

Nursing Homework

help with assignment To Prepare: · Identify two to three scholarly resources, in addition to this Module’s readings, that evaluate the impact of leadership behaviors in creating healthy work environments. · Reflect on the leadership behaviors presented in the three resources that you selected for review. · Reflect on your

J

Mrs. Lisa Horowitz is a 35 year-old Orthodox Jewish woman, who is married for 10 years, and has six (6) children all under 15 years-of-age.  Today, she seeks care from her OB/GYN for abnormal uterine bleeding.  After a thorough evaluation, diagnostics and imaging, her results confirm a uterine mass.  Further

week 5

See attached for instructions  Post an explanation of at least two strategies for including academic activities and accomplishments into your professional development goals. Then, explain how those goals may align with the University’s emphasis on social change. Be specific and provide examples. Plz provide 350 words Plz provide references

NUR 630

NUR 630 Weekly Discussion Submission Instructions: • Your initial post should be at least 500 words or more, 1. Introduction to Child Psychiatry After studying Module 1: Lecture Materials & Resources, address the following in a well-written discussion post: • Should we be “diagnosing” children with psychological disorders?  Use current US scholarly

final project breast cancer survivors

Your final paper will encompass all assignments you have completed thus far. At this point, you will have submitted each section individually and a comprehensive rough draft. You have received extensive feedback. An attempt to incorporate all previous assignment feedback should be evident. 
 The paper should be between 20

Nursing HCAD ASSIGNMENT 2

 Grading will focus on content development, depth of analysis and professionalism of delivery. Your final deliverable will be a presentation of no more than 10 minutes in length, developed in an MS PowerPoint slide deck suitable for presentation to the Board of Directors or a C-Suite executive team. 

narrated power point

A narrated PowerPoint on Diverticulitis. PLEASE include narration on the PowerPoint. Name of Disease: Definition Diverticulitis Epidemiology risk factor clinical picture narration Characteristics of diverticulitis with pictures( ABCD ) REFERENCES :

DNP

Choose at least 3 of the golden rules of leadership discussed during this module, and explain the best way you can implement them in your workplace with samples. Remember to review the  academic expectations for your submission. Submission Instructions: · Your initial post should be at least 450 words, formatted, and

DNP

D.N.P. Leadership Role in the Conflict Solution and Crisis Management Instructions: Think about a crisis or conflict in your work area, and develop an essay of a minimum of three pages explaining how, as a D.N.P. Leadership Role, you can use the strategies for conflict solution and crisis management to

Biostadistic

Using the reading covered in this module review the scenarios below. For each method, determine if a probability sampling or non probability sampling method is used. For each question, determine if this an effective way to determine patient satisfaction. Why or why not? 1. The CEO of a regional hospital

Biostadistic

Using the AGMU virtual library select one research paper on a topic of interest to you that reports quantitative research. Summarize the research by answering the following questions: 1. Identify where the steps in the scientific method lie within the paper. 2. Decide whether or not the paper follows the

Action Plan Review Presentation at the Clinical Site Peer Review

Action Plan Review Presentation at the Clinical Site Peer Review You will schedule a meeting with your Faculty Member, preceptor and stakeholders to review your action plan for your DNP Project during weeks 8, 9, or 10. You will also complete your practicum meeting with the preceptor at that time.

Nursing homework question 1017

3. Personal Statement or Philosophy of Practice  · 1–2 pages outlining your values, goals, and vision as an NP. 12. Reflection  · 1–2 page reflection on your NP journey and future goals

nursing

1) Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts. Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days by supporting or expanding on the ideas identified by your colleagues or sharing additional perspectives on the issue described by your colleagues. 2) Post substantive responses to at least two colleagues on two different days

ASSESSMENT 4_6026

What are some of your personal goals for personal, professional, and leadership development that you will achieve in the practicum experience? During my practicum, my personal goals include strengthening my self-awareness and emotional intelligence to better navigate professional challenges and interpersonal dynamics. I also aim to develop my adaptability and

Care Coordination Presentation to Colleagues

Your preceptor has been observing your effectiveness as a care coordinator and recognizes the importance of educating other staff nurses in care coordination. Consequently, she has asked you to develop a presentation for your colleagues on care coordination basics. By providing them with basic information about the care coordination process,

Final Care Coordination Strategy

You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health: Cultural Competence activity prior to completing this assessment. Completing course activities before submitting your first attempt has been shown to make the difference between basic and proficient assessment. In this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination infographic you developed in