TRANSLATION FRAMEWORKS/MODELS
Collaboration offers the advantage of incorporating other experiences and viewpoints to confirm or challenge your own. Discussions can do the same, and for some topics, getting early feedback is especially valuable. This Discussion is one such example. As you dig into the science of translation and select a framework or model for your proposed EBP, IS, and QI Assignment, you can look to your colleagues for valuable advice and feedback.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
· White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. F. (Eds.). (2024).
Translation of evidence into nursing and healthcare (4th ed.). Springer.
·
· Chapter 2, “The Science of Translation and Major Frameworks” (pp. 25–53)
· Chapter 3, “Change Theories for Translation” (pp. 53–67)
· Jones-Schenk, J., & Bleich, M. R. (2019).
Implementation science as a leadership and doctor of nursing practice competencyLinks to an external site..
The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 50(11), 491–492.
Note: These resources were previously presented in Week 4.
·
Document:
College of Nursing PowerPoint Template (PowerPoint presentation)
Download College of Nursing PowerPoint Template (PowerPoint presentation)
· Microsoft. (n.d.).
Microsoft 365 for Mac quick startsLinks to an external site.
.
Note: If you are a Mac user and have never experienced PowerPoint before, this source will guide you through the basics of how to use PowerPoint. The time estimate for this resource is approximately 20 minutes.
· Microsoft. (n.d.).
PowerPoint for Windows trainingLinks to an external site.
.
Note: If you are a PC user and have never experienced PowerPoint before, this source will guide you through the basics of how to use PowerPoint. The time estimate for this resource is approximately 20 minutes.
· Walden University Academic Skills Center. (n.d.).
How do I create a strong PowerPoint presentation?Links to an external site.
· Walden University Academic Skills Center. (n.d.).
MS PowerPoint resources: Getting startedLinks to an external site.
.
· IRL – Research and Science Course. (2019, August 30).
What is implementation science?Links to an external site.
[Video]. YouTube.
Note: This resource was previously presented in Week 4.
· IRL – Research and Science Course. (2019, August 30).
Theories and frameworks in implementation scienceLinks to an external site.
[Video]. YouTube.
Note: This resource was previously presented in Week 4.
· Walden University. (2021).
DNP glossaryLinks to an external site.
[Interactive media]. Walden University Canvas.
Note: This resource was previously presented in Week 4.
· Review the Week 5 Learning Resources, paying particular attention to the featured frameworks and models described in the White, Dudley-Brown, and Terhaar chapters.
· Identify the translation framework or model that is most relevant to the practice or organization issue you selected for your EBP, IS, and QI Assignment.
· Assess your understanding of translation science and consider how you would explain it in the context of EBP and QI.
By Day 3 Of Week 5
Post the following:
· Describe the translation framework or model that you selected for your EBP, IS, and QI Assignment.
· Explain why you think it is the most relevant and applicable translation framework or model to use for your EBP, IS, and QI Assignment. Be specific and provide examples.
Note: Your posts should be substantial supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA Style. Personal anecdotes are acceptable as part of a meaningful post but cannot stand alone as the entire post.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts.
By Day 6 of Week 5
Respond to at least
two of your colleagues, on different days, who selected translation frameworks or models different than you did, by suggesting an additional framework or model that they might consider and explaining why you think it might be a good fit for their EBP, IS, and QI Assignment.
Note: Your responses to colleagues should be substantial supported with scholarly evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources, and properly cited using APA Style. Personal anecdotes are acceptable as part of a meaningful response but cannot stand alone as a response. Your responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning experience for all students.
Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights that you have gained because of your colleagues’ comments.
