Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

W&SCase

Is There a Maximum Rate of Pay?

You are the Total Rewards Manager for Front Appliance Company. You are usually a pretty relaxed, friendly, and easy-going manager. Although you are a no-nonsense, competent executive, you are one of the most popular managers in the company. This particular morning, however, you feel a challenge ahead.

As chair of Front’s job evaluation committee, you called a late-morning meeting at which several jobs were to be considered for re-evaluation. The jobs had already been rated and assigned to Pay Grade 4. But the Office Manager, Ortho Janson, was upset that one of his employees was not rated higher. To press the issue, Ortho had taken his case to two executives who were members of the job evaluation committee. The two executives (Production Manager Peter Strong and Marketing Manager Margo Arms) then requested that the job ratings be reviewed. Peter and Margo supported Ortho’s side of the dispute, and you are not looking forward to the confrontation that is almost certain to occur. 

The controversial job is that of receptionist. Only one receptionist position exists at Front Appliances, and Rebecca Reichart held it. Rebecca has been with the firm 14 years, longer than any of the committee members. She is extremely efficient, and virtually all the executives in the company, including the president, have noticed and commented on her outstanding work. Peter and Margo are particularly pleased with Rebecca because of the cordial manner in which she greets and accommodates Front’s customers and vendors, who frequently visit the plant. They feel that Rebecca projects a positive image of the company.

To begin the meeting, 
you say the following:

(Fill in what you would say.)

But before you can finish, Peter interrupts: “I suggest we start with Rebecca.” Margo nods in agreement. When you regain your composure, 
you quietly but firmly assert:

(Fill in what you would say.)

Then you proceed to pass out copies of the receptionist job description to Peter and Margo, who are visibly irritated. 

 

Continue in the meeting and lead the discussion, in a conversational tone as if Rebecca were also in the room.

1.
Explain to the group why you insist that the job, not the person, be evaluated.

2.
Share with the others whether or not you think there should be a maximum rate of pay for every job in an organization, regardless of how well the job is being performed. Justify your response. 

3.
Rebecca is earning the maximum of the range for her pay grade. Discuss ways an employee at the top of his/her pay range might be able to obtain a salary increase. 
Be specific and give good examples that Rebecca might also be able to apply easily to her situation.

Use at least 
3 library sources and/or module materials to help strengthen and support what you say.

Submit your response by the module due date. Your response can be in one of the following formats:

· Audio recording (about 8 minutes, with a written reference list provided)

· Audio/video slide presentation (8 slides, not counting the cover or reference slide)

· Short video (about 8 minutes), with a reference list provided)

Note: Video, Audio, and Voice Over Slide Presentations

These presentations might take time to upload directly to the classroom. If you have slow internet, you may be timed out.

To resolve this, your submission may be uploaded to YouTube and the link shared. Set as 
public or unlisted, NOT PRIVATE. Unlisted means your audio/video/slide presentation will not come up in search results. Only those who know the link can view it, even if they do not have a YouTube account/username.

Important: Put the link to your video, slide presentation, or audio recording in a Word document and submit your Word document as the assignment to the Dropbox. Your professor will find the link and click it to access your submission. (Note: Slide presentations with written speaker notes normally load to the classroom with no issue.)

Assignment Expectations

Your submission will be evaluated using the criteria as stated in the Case rubric. The following is a review of the rubric criteria:

·
Assignment-Driven: Does the submission fully address all aspects of the assignment? Is the assignment addressed accurately and precisely using sound logic? Does it meet minimum length requirements?

·
Critical Thinking: Does the submission demonstrate graduate-level analysis, in which information derived from multiple sources, expert opinions, and assumptions has been critically evaluated and synthesized in the formulation of a logical set of conclusions? Does it address the topic with sufficient depth of discussion and analysis?

·
Business Writing: Is the submission logical, well organized and well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are section headings included, if submission is in written form? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding, or is justification/support instead conveyed through excessive use of direct quotations?

·
Effective Use of Information: Does the submission demonstrate that the student has read, understood, and can apply the background materials for the module? If required, has the student demonstrated effective research, as evidenced by student’s use of relevant and quality (library) sources? Do additional sources used provide strong support for conclusions drawn, and do they help in shaping the overall submission?

·
Citing Sources: Does the student demonstrate understanding of APA Style of referencing, by inclusion of proper citations (for paraphrased text and direct quotations) as appropriate? Have sources (e.g., references used from the Background page, the assignment readings, and outside research) been included, and are these properly cited? Have all sources cited in the submission been included on the References page?

·
Timeliness: Has the assignment been submitted to TLC (Trident’s learning management system) on or before the module’s due date?

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

QUZ and QDD

Using ChatGPT (Artificial Intelligence AI) respond to the following questions: 1. What is organizational change according to AI? How does the definition compare to the textbook’s definition? 2. What are the organizational change models listed by ChatGPT? Describe each of them. TEXTBOOK(S) AND REQUIRED MATERIALS: Title: Organization Change: Theory and

8

The purpose of this discussion is to reflect on your own readiness to practice as a DNP- prepared nurse, to consider what you learned in this course and how this knowledge will impact your practice. Reflective inquiry allows for the expansion of self-awareness, identification of knowledge gaps, and assessment of

2 discussions adv

2 separate discussions It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum requirement, but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the

GrowthCase

The purpose of the Case Assignment is to create a “Live Case” by experiencing the process of coaching. Because this case is designed around  experiential learning , we can go beyond the conceptual knowledge covered in the reading materials to actual skills building. This requires putting what you are learning

GrowthSlp

Developing a vision statement In Module 1, you began the process of the Leadership Growth Plan with a thorough self-assessment. Then you identified and prioritized your most important values and motivators and explored your basic leadership style. In this module, you will establish your vision and determine what you need

77

The purpose of this discussion is for the DNP student to demonstrate an understanding of how stakeholders influence practice change. You will continually gain experience considering the organization, community, and national stakeholders and how they influence sustained practice change. 1. Identify and examine organization and/or community stakeholders you anticipate will

COM Week 3

  View the TED Talk “Weird, or just different?”Links to an external site. by Derek Sivers (TEDIndia, 2009). Respond to the following questions: What are your impressions of his talk? Did his talk give you any new perspective on the process or skill of communication, especially with regard to intercultural

98

  Specific Instructions: Team Structure: As part of the course, starting Week 2, you will all be automatically placed into groups, and all your Discussions until the end of the class will be carried out in groups. So, in each week’s discussion, you will only see your teammates.  Please respond

Applied Sciences WK3 ASSIGNMENT2

Week Three: Module 3 Session 6 Assignment Paper Assignment: Please refer to your org. structure that you were guided to retrieve in Module Two. Next, see pg. 226: Given the current structure of your chosen org., decide whether a redesign would help your organization compete more effectively, or reach its

wk8

LEGAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES RELATED TO PSYCHIATRIC EMERGENCIES The diagnosis of psychiatric emergencies can include a wide range of problems—from serious drug reactions to abuse and suicidal ideation/behaviors. Regardless of care setting, the PMHNP must know how to address emergencies, coordinate care with other members of the health care team

DQQ33

There are three questions, Q1 discissions, and the other 2  Q are replies for friends Q.2 and Q.3  Q.1 THINKING PASSAGES: GLOBAL WARMING (350 or More) The three passages on global warming offer very different views on the validity of the concept. You should answer the questions at the end

Gospel Message Friendships and Barriers

What practical steps would you take to build a friendship with a follower of this worldview who might be a co-worker, neighbor, etc.? What do’s and don’ts would you apply when preparing to share the gospel with them? What are some beliefs/reasons a person from this worldview might have that

SE

READ- Problem There are knowledge gaps between heart disease and depression risk factors. Cardiovascular patients may have depressive symptoms that develop, due to chronicity of their illness, lack of physical activity, increased stress levels, or pre-existing mental health conditions. Cardiovascular individuals are screened for depressive symptoms utilizing validated screeners: and

pi

2 Discussion: Biomedical Issues and Donations Name Institution Course Professor Date Your major paper is focused on persuasion theories and is due Oct. 17 Read Chapters Five and six and select only three theories.  Only choose three from the following theories: 1.      Authoritarianism and acquiescence (these are concepts and not a

Discussion response unit 6 adv health

Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts.  To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts: · Do you agree with your peers’ assessment? · Take an opposing view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate opinion. ·

Unit 6 response adv psych

Instructions: Please read and respond to at least two of your peers’ initial postings. You may want to consider the following questions in your responses to your peers: · Compare and contrast your initial posting with those of your peers.   · How are they similar or how are they