3-3 HRM630. Short Paper: National Health and Implications for Health Care Administrators
In 1979, the Surgeon General reported that, as a nation, we were in good health. However, the argument was made that we could be in better health if we focused on prevention rather than reaction. More than three decades later, determine if our system today is more preventative or reactive-focused. Discuss your position and the implications it may have for current and future health care administrators.
HRM 630 Short Paper Case Study Guidelines and Rubric: What to Submit
Submit the assignment as a 2- to 4-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. As you write the short papers, consider how diversity, equity, and inclusion can be included. Sources should be cited according to APA style. Be certain to read through the rubric to include all of the required elements.
Short Paper Case Study RubricCriteriaExceeds Expectations (100%)Meets Expectations (90%)Partially Meets Expectations (70%)Does Not Meet Expectations (0%)ValueMain ElementsIncludes all of the main elements and requirements and cites multiple examples to illustrate each elementIncludes most of the main elements and requirements and cites many examples to illustrate each elementIncludes some of the main elements and requirementsDoes not include any of the main elements and requirements25Inquiry and AnalysisProvides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of multiple conceptsProvides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of some conceptsProvides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of minimal conceptsDoes not provide in-depth analysis20Integration and ApplicationAll of the course concepts are correctly appliedMost of the course concepts are correctly appliedSome of the course concepts are correctly appliedDoes not correctly apply any of the course concepts10Critical ThinkingDraws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examplesDraws informed conclusions that are justified with evidenceDraws logical conclusions, but does not defend with evidenceDoes not draw logical conclusions20ResearchIncorporates many scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of researchIncorporates some scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of researchIncorporates very few scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of researchDoes not incorporate scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research15Clear CommunicationExceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understandingConsistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audienceShows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understandingShows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication10Total:100%
