I have completed part 1 which is attached please do part two
Competency and Practice Behaviors
Social workers understand theories of human behavior and the social environment and critically evaluate and apply this knowledge to facilitate engagement with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities. Social workers understand strategies to engage diverse clients and constituencies to advance practice effectiveness.
Social workers:
Apply knowledge of human behavior and the social environment, person-in-environment, and other multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks to engage with clients and constituencies; and
Use empathy, reflection, and interpersonal skills to effectively engage diverse clients and constituencies.
Directions
In this capstone section of the paper, you will apply one human behavior theory and one practice model to a specific case from your field placement (or another approved case if different from Part 1).
This section must be written in narrative, essay format. Bullet points are not acceptable.
Your paper should include:
Overview of the CaseProvide a concise overview of the case (maintaining confidentiality). You may use a different case than Part 1 if appropriate.
Description of the Theory and Practice ModelDescribe the human behavior theory and the practice model you selected. Provide scholarly citations indicating where you obtained information about each.
Application to the CaseExplain how you applied the human behavior theory to understand the client’s situation.Then, explain how you applied the practice model to guide your intervention or engagement.Demonstrate integration — show how the theory informed your understanding and how the model shaped your response.
Rationale for Practice Model SelectionDiscuss your rationale for selecting your chosen practice model. Why was it the best fit for this case?
Professional Learning and ImpactReflect on what you learned from applying both the theory and the practice model.How did this deepen your understanding of the client?How did it strengthen your practice skills?
Scholarly Expectations
Properly cite the theory and practice model using textbooks and/or peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
Website citations are not permitted and will result in point deductions.
Integrate sources throughout your discussion rather than summarizing them in isolation.
Click here to review the difference between a Human Behavior Theory and Practice modelFormatting Requirements
2–3 pages
APA 7th edition
Narrative format (no bullet points)
12-point font
1.5 spacing
Title page and reference page required
No abstract required
RubricCAPSTONECAPSTONECriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDifferences and Anti-Oppressive Practice12 to >11.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationThoroughly reflects on personal and professional growth regarding working with diverse groups & provides at least four examples; included at least three diversity areas that link well with the practice (field) situation. Provide two clear and detailed examples of a field placement where you demonstrated cultural humility by applying critical reflection, self-awareness, and self-regulation to manage your influence of bias, power, privilege, or values (pick at least two) in working with clients that are supported by professional or scholarly citation (1). Thoroughly details how they handled both situations and detailed how three social work skills were used to engage the client(s) with (2) scholarly citations that can include textbooks for the skills section. Includes 4 scholarly citations in this section. Include 3 full pages (APA, 12 Font; Times New Roman; 1.5 spacing)11 to >9.71 ptsMeets ExpectationsFully reflected on personal and professional growth regarding working with diverse groups & provides at least two examples; included at least two diversity areas that link well with the practice (field) situation. Provide two clear and detailed examples of a field placement where you demonstrated cultural humility by applying critical reflection, self-awareness, and self-regulation to manage your influence of bias, power, privilege, or values (pick at least two) in working with clients. Fully details how they handled both situations and detailed how three social work skills were used to engage the client(s) with (1) scholarly citations that can include textbooks for the skills section. Includes 2 scholarly citations in this section. Included 2 full pages (APA, 12 Font, Times New Roman: 1.5 spacing)9.71 to >9.0 ptsFAIRPartially reflected on personal and professional growth regarding working with diverse groups & provides at least one example; Included at least one diversity area that links with the practice (field) situation. Provide one vague example of a field placement where you demonstrated cultural humility by applying critical reflection, self-awareness, and self-regulation to manage your influence of bias, power, privilege, or values in working with clients. Ambiguous information on how they handled a situation and applied one social work skill to engage the client(s); No scholarly citations were included. No scholarly citations were in this section. Included 1.5 full pages (APA, 12 Font, Times New Roman: 1.5 spacing)9 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThis section was not adequately addressed. See the instructor’s feedback in the final draft of the capstone12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdvanced knowledge and skills for direct practice/strength‐based eclectic approach to practice12 to >11.0 ptsExceeds ExpectationMeets expectations and exceeds by detailing and thoroughly reflecting on significant learning and application, or anticipated knowledge and skills for handling complex direct practice situations with children, youth, and families. Thoroughly Identifies specific case situations & applies human behavior theory AND practice model/theory. Includes a citation that explains & supports the application. Describes an in-depth rationale and implementation of theoretical choices that includes at least 2 citations. Identifies and provides 3-4 client strengths and examples; thoroughly details the outcome of the case. Outlines at least three clear professional lessons learned from the case. Provides at least 4 scholarly articles in this section. Include 3 full pages (APA, 12 Font; Times New Roman; 1.5 spacing)11 to >9.71 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe section fully reflects on significant learning and application or anticipated knowledge and skills for handling complex direct practice situations with children, youth, and families. Clearly Identifies specific case situations & applies human behavior theory AND practice model/theory. Summarizes a rationale and implementation of theoretical choices that include at least 1 scholarly citation. Identifies and provides 2 strengths of the client and examples; details the outcome of the case. Outlines at least two clear professional lessons learned from the case. Provides at least 2 scholarly articles in this section. Include 2 full pages (APA, 12 Font; Times New Roman; 1.5 spacing)9.71 to >9.0 ptsFAIRPartial Reflection on significant learning and application or anticipated knowledge and skills for handling complex direct practice situations with children, youth, and families. Identifies some parts of case situations & applies some human behavior theory AND practice model/theory. Provides a vague rationale and implementation of theoretical choices that include there is no scholarly citation included. Identifies a client’s strengths and vague information about the outcome of the case. Outlines at least one professional lesson learned from the case. Provides at least 1 scholarly article in this section. Includes 1.5 full pages (APA, 12 Font; Times New Roman; 1.5 spacing)9 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThis section was not adequately addressed. See the instructor’s feedback in the final draft of the capstone12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKnowledge and skills for research & evaluation12 to >11.0 ptsExceeds Expectation11 to >9.71 ptsMeets Expectations9.71 to >9.0 ptsFAIR9 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThis section was not adequately addressed. See the instructor’s feedback in the final draft of the capstone12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePolicy Practice12 to >11.0 ptsExceeds Expectation11 to >9.71 ptsMeets Expectations9.71 to >9.0 ptsFAIR9 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThis section was not adequately addressed. See the instructor’s feedback in the final draft of the capstone12 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelf‐reflection/summary7 to >6.65 ptsExceeds Expectation6.65 to >5.6 ptsMeets Expectations5.6 to >4.9 ptsFair4.9 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementThis section was not adequately addressed. See the instructor’s feedback in the final draft of the capstone7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting & Professional Presentation of the Electronic Capstone15 to >14.25 ptsFull Marks14.25 to >12.0 ptsMeets Expectations12 to >10.5 ptsFair10.5 to >0 ptsNo Marks15 pts
Total Points: 70
