Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

[rank_math_breadcrumb]

home work

Please follow instructions. No AI

You must post before seeing replies. Edit history will be available to instructors.

Due Sep 10 65 points

7 Replies (7)

View Split Screen

All

Search entries or author…

Newest First

 Back to Week at a Glance
(

MEASUREMENT OF CONCEPTUAL
VARIABLES

Last week, you learned about the importance of operationally defining variables to support the
construct validity and internal validity of a study. Operational definitions are also important as
you consider how to measure variables. For example, you will need to operationally define
conceptual variables of interest (e.g., self-esteem, satisfaction, anxiety) before you can measure
the concepts. When the measure accurately assesses the conceptual variable, it is said to have

(
LgRendition/GettyLicense_155136356.jpg)

3
3

face validity. Operationalizing variables is also important to the measurement concept of
reliability, which is the consistency or stability of a measure (e.g., test and retest to achieve similar
results).

In this Discussion, you will gain experience writing items to create a rating scale for a conceptual
variable of your choice, which you will administer to friends/family. Based on the responses you
obtain, you will consider the validity and reliability of your scale.

RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Review previous chapters if you need to (e.g., Chapter 4 on
variables and operational definitions)

Cozby, P. C., & Bates, S. C. (2024). Methods in behavioral
research (15th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Chapter 5, “Measurement Concepts”

Chapter 7, “Asking People About Themselves: Survey
Research”

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)
(
direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=pst&AN=9999-01038-000&site=eds-
live&scope=site&custid=s6527200) [Database record]. APA PsycTests.

ShortCutsTV (Producer). (2018). Reliability & validity
( [Video].
Alexander Street.

Walden University, LLC. (2024). Creating rating scales
(
media.waldenu.edu/2dett4d/Walden/PSYC/3003/cr/index.html)

Readings 

Media 

Optional Resources 

To prepare:

Read Chapter 5 and the indicated sections of Chapter 7 (focusing on the sections
Constructing Questions to Ask, Responses to Questions, and Rating Scales).
Recall what you learned in this week’s Learning Activity about creating rating scales with
numeric values, and review the example scale in the Learning Resources. Note that your
own rating scale may differ from the examples depending on the requirements for
measuring the conceptual variable you select.
Identify a conceptual variable that is of interest to you. A few examples are social
identity, risk-taking behavior, job satisfaction, employee engagement, environmental
awareness. Once you have decided on a conceptual variable, develop an operational
definition for the variable.
Create your own five- to 10-item rating scale with numerical values to assess the
conceptual variable you defined.

Before writing the items, consider the wording of statements and possible related
issues (e.g., double-barred statements, loaded statements, “yea-saying” and “nay-
saying,” etc.).
Be sure to fully develop your rating scale to include instructions for your
participants. Note: For the version of the scale you will provide in your post, include
coding instructions for the administrator (e.g., reverse-score certain items).

Administer the scale to at least three friends or family members. You may administer it in
person or via email.
Analyze the responses you obtained (i.e., what do responses reveal related to your
conceptual variable?).
Reflect on the possible strengths and limitations related to the measurement reliability
and validity of your scale.
Prepare to upload the scale you created as an attached document (in Word or RTF
format) to your Discussion post.

Post a response to the following.

[Interactive media]. Walden University Canvas.

American Psychological Association. (2023, June). Psychology
topics ( .

BY DAY 3

Include the conceptual variable in the first line of your post (e.g., “Job Satisfaction”).

Then:

Provide the operational definition you created for your conceptual variable.
Explain your experience writing the scale (noting at least one challenge) and
administering the scale.
Provide your analysis of the responses you obtained as it relates to your conceptual
variable. Do not include your participants’ actual responses.
Assess the strengths and limitations of your scale’s reliability and validity, describing what
you might do differently (if anything) in a revision.
Attach the five- to 10-item scale with numerical values to measure a conceptual variable
that you developed (either a Word or RTF file).

Note: Your initial response should be supported with scholarly evidence from your research
and/or the Learning Resources and properly cited in APA format. You may state your opinion
and/or provide personal examples; however, you must also back up your assertions with
evidence, including in-text citation(s) and reference(s) in APA style. It is recommended that
you review the Grading Rubric with the criteria that will be used to evaluate your Discussion
prior to your submission.

Respond to at least one colleague’s original post in one or more of the ways listed below.

Ask a probing question about their experience developing or administering the scale and
provide the foundation, or a rationale, for the question.
Offer an alternative way that the variables of interest in their proposed study could be
operationally defined.
Support or offer a different perspective to a colleague’s explanation of the strengths and
limitations concerning the reliability and/or validity of their scale.

Note: Your response to your colleague should be substantive and supported with scholarly
evidence from your research and/or the Learning Resources and properly cited in APA
format. Personal anecdotes are acceptable within meaningful responses but cannot stand
alone as a response. Responses should enrich the initial post by supporting and/or adding a
fresh viewpoint and be constructive, enhancing the learning for all students.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before
you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by
clicking on the Reply button to complete your initial post. Remember, once you
click on Post Reply, you cannot delete or edit your own posts and you cannot

BY DAY 5

post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Post
Reply!

Reply

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

IND Hw 9

For this assignment, you will read a few example studies and try to figure out the null and alternative hypotheses, and what the type I and type II errors would be in those situations.  Here’s an Example to give you an idea about what you’ll be doing: A researcher is

Amanda

Amanda Choosing the Correct Statistical Test Worksheet Directions: Review your chapter readings and the following resources found in Topic 6 Resources: Choosing the Right Statistical Test: Types and Examples and An Introduction to Statistics: Choosing the Correct Statistical Test, then walk through the tree diagram and answer the following questions.

Statement of intent

  Goal Statement:Your name and complete name of the program you are applying for should be at the top of your goal statement. We strongly suggest that you format your goal statement by heading each section from the guidelines. Write your information in paragraph form and do not use bullet format

challenges unions

What were some of the most significant challenges unions faced as they tried to represent industrial workers in the late 19th century? What caused some of the major setbacks experienced by the era’s unions?

FP Week 3 Discussion 2

Case Study The enclosed chard body which was brought to your ME’s Office for investigation of this death case, what is the information that Forensic Pathologist/ME should provide to you help in successful investigating this case:  Please note that the following is required concerning the Threaded Discussions: ● Please use bullet

FP Week 3 Discussion 1

Petechial Hemorrhages in Asphyxial Deaths What is the mechanism of formation of petechiae in the skin and mucous membranes–including conjunctivae? Why are they more commonly seen in strangulation as opposed to suicidal hanging? Please note that the following is required concerning the Threaded Discussions: ● Please use bullets or numbers

DIS 9

ATTACHED Although not foolproof, research suggests public affirmations of ethical behavior are helpful for maintaining such behavior.   As you prepare to embark on your journey as a behavior analysis professional, reflect on the principles and values that will guide your ethical conduct throughout your career. In this discussion, develop

Make up work 3

Part 1: Discussion post (150-215 words) (No reference) Discussion #9- 5 Points Chapter 12 deals with academic and social-emotional struggles such as: study skills deficits, test anxiety, school attendance, changing schools, difficulty with friendships, bullying, sexual orientation struggles, intimacy and dating, and intimate partner violence.   Based on your professional experience, choose

psychology

PSYC 221 Discussion Assignment Instructions The student will complete 3 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 150 words by 11:59

Psychology Week 4 assignment

Follow all the instructions and rubric. Use Literature Analysis Worksheet attached.  Remove or Replace: Header Is Not Doc Title Literature Analysis Worksheet Complete the following worksheet after finding your three articles. References APA-formatted reference for Article 1: Autism Spectrum Disorder APA-formatted reference for Article 2: ABA in Education APA-formatted reference

Make up work 2

Part 1: Discussion post (150-215 words) (No reference) Discussion #8- 5 Points Based on the information that you have read in chapters 7-11 what particularly resonates with you and why?  Your personal examples are always encouraged and have been very beneficial to the class thus far! Keep up the good work!  Respond to at

DB

 Share with the class the topic on which you wrote your assignment. What interesting things did you learn while researching? Anything new? Any interesting cases? Briefly discuss.  Topic:  Overuse Injuries in Youth Sports: Recalibrating the Duty of Care in Negligent Supervision Claims

Psychology Discussion/Assignment/Project

Please ensure to follow all instructions to ensure a good grade. Please complete without the use of AI or chatgpt. ©2024 Walden University, LLC Page 1 of 4 PREL 3001 Final Project Description Select a public relations problem or opportunity to be approved by your instructor to serve as your

Discussion

 Explain in detail how you intend to integrate the major concepts and skills learned in this course into your future work as a counseling or mental health professional. Be sure to support your discussion with appropriate scholarly sources and citations. 

relection 4

see attachment Explain a time you witnessed an unprofessional situation happening in a location where professionalism was expected.  What did you learn from that event?     References are required for all written assignments. The general rule for references is 1.5 references per page submitted. The reference requirement means a