Kibata

Sign In

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now
[rank_math_breadcrumb]

Overview You will complete five program critique assignments in the course to support your work as you prepare for your final project. These assignments ask that you critique a program described withi

Overview

You will complete five program critique assignments in the course to support your work as you prepare for your final project. These assignments ask that you critique a program described within an identified article located in the module’s resources. These articles were chosen because they relate to the module’s topics and demonstrate some common problems that programs encounter. In each assignment, you will have the opportunity to critique certain program components, such as resources, activities, outcome measures, use of feedback loops, assumptions, and external barriers. Once planners have identified the details for each of the program components, they must step back and assess how those components can best operate within the program’s environment. That involves considering concepts such as cultural competency, systems thinking, ethical practice, and others. You will focus on these different concepts, in turn, through the program critiques. As you develop your program critique skills, you will be asked to identify areas that could be or need to be improved and offer recommendations.

In this assignment, you will critique a health or healthcare program selected for you. The program is described in the program critique reading found in the Resources section of the module. This is the only reading that can be used for this assignment. Analyze the information based on expected and actual outcomes, the effectiveness of the program, and the areas of improvement.

This activity will help you analyze the identified program’s flaws and/or shortfalls and understand how these could have been avoided or addressed. Your analysis will help you to take preventive measures while planning your own program for the course project.

Prompt

Write a program critique analysis that critically examines a health or healthcare program intended to meet a specific health need.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

  1. Program Outcomes: Explain how the program achieves its desired outcomes. Consider the following questions to guide your response:
  2. Program Effectiveness: Describe whether you consider this program effective or ineffective, including examples and evidence to support your claims. Consider the following question to guide your response:
  3. Analysis of Improvement Areas: Analyze the areas of improvement needed concerning the program’s data collection, analysis, or outcome measures. Consider the following questions to guide your response:

Note that all the claims in your deliverable should be evidence-based. Your citations should be from your independent search for evidence (not from the scenario, textbook, or module resources) of credible sources and be current within the last five years. You are required to cite a minimum of two sources, at least one of which should be separate from your own research. Refer to the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate located in the Start Here section of the course for additional support. If you need writing support, access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course.

FOCUS ON SOCIAL DETERMENTS OF HEALTH 

What to Submit

Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. Also include a title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Order Now

Related Questions

On Page 27 of the CMS Quality Strategy Document “Engage Individuals and Communities to become partners in their care” is stated to be an overall objective of this quality initiative. The author(s) of

On Page 27 of the CMS Quality Strategy Document “Engage Individuals and Communities to become partners in their care” is stated to be an overall objective of this quality initiative.  The author(s) of this article then provide four specific outcomes which demonstrate this.  How might the HIM Profession contribute to

On Page 27 of the CMS Quality Strategy Document “Engage Individuals and Communities to become partners in their care” is stated to be an overall objective of this quality initiative. The author(s) of

On Page 27 of the CMS Quality Strategy Document “Engage Individuals and Communities to become partners in their care” is stated to be an overall objective of this quality initiative.  The author(s) of this article then provide four specific outcomes which demonstrate this.  How might the HIM Profession contribute to

Question : Write a Case study on Lynch Syndrome and Ethical Implications in Nursing Practice Content: CaseStudy is summarized with constructs well defined. Evident that student synthesized learning.

Question : Write a Case study on  Lynch Syndrome and Ethical Implications in Nursing Practice Content: CaseStudy is summarized with constructs well defined. Evident that student synthesized learning. Includes introduction, summary and implications for practice.                              

Follow instructions below for case analysis and rubric is links below: Use the same case that you began to analyze in part 1 with assessment of: medical indicationspatient preferencesSegment 2 will co

Follow instructions below for case analysis and rubric is links below: Use the same case that you began to analyze in part 1 with assessment of: medical indications patient preferences Segment 2 will continue your assessment with inclusion of:  3. quality-of-life considerations   4. contextual features Segment 2 will also include an organized problem-solving section that:  defines

Follow instructions below for case analysis and rubric is attached in the files: Use the same case that you began to analyze in part 1 with assessment of: medical indicationspatient preferencesSegment

Follow instructions below for case analysis and rubric is attached in the files: Use the same case that you began to analyze in part 1 with assessment of: medical indications patient preferences Segment 2 will continue your assessment with inclusion of:  3. quality-of-life considerations   4. contextual features Segment 2 will also include an organized problem-solving section

Case: Let’s Cut the Deadweight. Complete the three questions for the case. APA format. case: Let’s Cut the Deadweight Two supervisors, Robert and Janet, were in charge of sections of the building s

Case: Let’s Cut the Deadweight.  Complete the three questions for the case.  APA format. case: Let’s Cut the Deadweight  Two supervisors, Robert and Janet, were in charge of sections of the building services department of Centrat Hespital. They had a fairly close working relationship; they were in a position to

In the article “New Cancer Treatments Lie Hidden Under Mountains of Paperwork”, one of the researchers says that “Data are trapped.” Later in the same article, another researcher states that “About 5

In the article “New Cancer Treatments Lie Hidden Under Mountains of Paperwork”, one of the researchers says that “Data are trapped.”  Later in the same article, another researcher states that “About 50 percent, if not more, of the critical details we need for research are trapped in unstructured documents.” Please

Connections Journals are opportunities for students to identify and analyze some connections among key course components. Over the last 3 weeks of the course, the modules have introduced some key con

Connections Journals are opportunities for students to identify and analyze some connections among key course components.  Over the last 3 weeks of the course, the modules have introduced some key concepts, such as surrogate decision making, advanced care planning, advanced directives and end-of-life decision making. For Connections Journal 2, write